No Windows on Second Plane?
You may recall that's one of the very early claims in Loose Change (about 9:02):
"It definitely did not look like a commercial plane, I didn't see any windows on the sides. "
"Mark, [sic] if that what you say is true those could be cargo planes. "
"You said, you didn't see any windows in the sides?”
"I didn't see any windows on sides. It was not a normal flight that I had ever seen, at an airport, it was a plane that had a blue logo on the front."
This is one of the advantages of there being so many different conspiracy theories; you can generally find evidence ignored by one group highlighted by another:
posted by Pat @ 8:08 AM
16 comments
16 Comments:
I saw windows.
Juji, you're unreliable and that piece of wreckage was planted by the Naudet brothers who were allowed into the disaster area by Marvin Bush because they were Freemasons.
(Marvin was acting on direct orders from the alien tribe Xthlanu.)
This is all true.
**There may be some sarcasm in this post**
:)
I really thought it was dark lord Xenu... but what do I know.
Chad,
I think you got it, chap!
jujigatami,
Noted.
NIST fudged some data
well, if one adds in the fact that Mork from Ork was a Freemason too...I don't think that I have to draw conclusions for everyone...
NIST fudged some data
The dude sure isn't any kind of math wiz, is he? Maybe he should become familiar with the pythagorean theorem before he posts again? Since the airplane came in with wings tilted, he's going to need that theorem to come up with anything resembling accuracy.
If anything, NIST is accurate and FEMA is not.
Lt,
Shazbot, now you've done it.
Black helicopters will be hovering above your house within minutes.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Undense,
Does it really matter?
They will grasp at anything. Someone superimposes a drawing of a plane over a diagram of the towers, nowhere is this image said to be a definitive impact analysis, nowhere is this even said to be accurate scale. It is a simple visual aid for illustrative purposes. A "here is where the plane hit" if you will.
But the looney tunes jump on this and decide it is yet more proof of conspiracy.
What I really don't get is that this hole in the WTC is pretty small, but virtually no one (except the truly fargone) denies it was a plane. But a hole of almost the same size in the Pentagon MUST have been made by a missile.
Sheesh.
Juji-
lmao right now.
LT
ROTFLMAO
So, apart from the videos of the plane, this strange hole in the building and a few plane parts that may well have been planted on the streets, what IS the evidence that a plane hit the South tower?
Uhh, how about the thousands of witnesses?
This reminds me of Monty Python's the Life of Brian.
Reg: All right, but apart from the sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
Attendee: Brought peace?
Reg: Oh, peace - shut up!
jujigatami,
I know they'll grasp at anything. But it's fun punching holes in their holes.
If it's done enough, maybe the few of them possessing IQ's above the level of mentally impaired might actually start thinking instead of just jerking their knee into their chin and causing even further brain damage.
undense - if only that could be a sincere hope!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
<< Home