Unlike a certain popular Google video, which will remain nameless, it does not consist of screenshots of blogs and wikipedia references, it is nothing but clips of Al Qaeda videos, along with the translations. Included are several clips of bin Laden and al Zawahiri, including the famous confession video, as well as videos by several of the hijackers, recording their reasons for carrying out the attacks. It is quite eerie, but well worth a watch.
Click here for the video.
Wow....
ReplyDeleteNessie, I can't wait to hear your explanation for this.
LOL sorry, I actually held off waiting for the author to respond, but I got impatient. If it is OK with him, I think we should send it to hotair, they would probably put it up.
ReplyDeleteYou have been getting threats? I just get called a shill. I feel left out.
ReplyDeleteHmm, maybe I am too intimidating. ;-) It must be the tough looking picture of me in my DCUs on my blog...
ReplyDeleteWhy'd you post a video of a bunch of CIA agents?
ReplyDeleteWhy'd you post a video of a bunch of CIA agents?
ReplyDeleteJooish CIA agents nonetheless. And the choppy editing clearly indicates that whoever pieced it together purposefully left out the images of them dancing the Macarena in the parking lot of an auto dealer who only sells conspicuous white vans.
And those translations were clearly CGI'd in. There's no way that the words the people were saying would physically appear in front of them as they spoke.
This whole thing is a joke and I question the timing.
Shalom!
Did anybody else notice the "explosions" going off when Al-Zawhiri and Bin Laden were praising the "19 brothers" by the base of the mountain? (8:31 mark)) Boom...Boom...Boom. It happened again at the start of Suleiman Abu Ghaith's speech by the rocks. Boom... Boom...Boom.
ReplyDeleteI know it was the wind blowing through the microphone each time, but couldn't that explain some of the "explosions" heard on LC? Or is that too Avery-esque for everybody?
I'm only posting this comment here because this is the more recent blog post.
ReplyDeleteThis evening Jim Fetzer was on Alan Colmes radio show for an hour or less. It was a huge failure. You guys should be happy: Fetzer acted like a jerk. If I knew nothing else and heard Fetzer speak tonight, I would have, I think, the same condemning attitude that many of you cheering on this blog have.
LOL Fetzer is such a loon. My favorite is where he says that Mineta resigned because he was on Hannity & Colmes.
ReplyDeleteIf I had a recording I could spend the next 3 weeks documenting all the lies he told.
Nessie, I can't wait to hear your explanation for this.
ReplyDeleteAl-CIA-duh Psy-ops.
Question, how easy is it to pay starving (literally) actors in the third world to create these kinds of videos? Nice effects on some too hey?
You guys remember that "Iraqis are pulling babies from incubator" story? A well known 5th Avenue PR firm's handiwork there. Yeah, they look "real" but you have to see who's paying for these very Hollywood productions.
Actors that just happened to look exactly like jihadists that hung out together and who showed up on video surveillance from that Tuesday morning?
ReplyDeleteSome of which were even at gatherings with Osama?
Dash cunning of the CIA.
You're stretching Nessie. And it's starting to get pretty damn lame.
The guy who does bin Laden is an actor?
ReplyDeleteYeah! Even the real Bin Laden was a CIA man.
Actors that just happened to look exactly like jihadists that hung out together and who showed up on video surveillance from that Tuesday morning?
ReplyDeleteThe ones that are still alive or the ones that were camera shy at the airports?
by the way, some German journalists actually did their homework and followed up on the hijacker story.
ReplyDeleteOh yeah like an "explanation" wasn't needed after the cover was blown way off. Mmmmkay..
The hijackers are in fact DEAD!
ReplyDeleteFunny how they didn't show up on >THIS autopsy list. You sure these are the same "dead" guys? LOL!
I thought a missile hit the Pentagon, nes??
ReplyDeleteDid you read the whole piece? In fact the "remains" weren't identified at the Pentagon.
Here's the problem with the 911myth site:
ReplyDeleteThis could well be a partial list, then. Visit the main Memorial page (www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memorial), click "About this site" and you'll find further qualifications on the data.
"This COULD well be?" The entire site is rubbish, supposition, innuendo and opinion not based on facts. It fails miserably at being a debunking site.
The author doesnt claim that what you are reading is "The Truth".
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly what I suspected.
Let's break this down:
No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab; however, three ADDITIONAL people not listed by American Airline sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these extras.
That's not 3 additional "nameless" Arabs. Those are identified as non-hijacker passengers. The 911myth guy got that totally wrong, like a lot of that site. I'm not sure if it's on purpose or just plain old disinformation.
How come no comments on this? Did I stump you guys?!?!?!?!?
ReplyDeleteYou guys remember that "Iraqis are pulling babies from incubator" story? A well known 5th Avenue PR firm's handiwork there. Yeah, they look "real" but you have to see who's paying for these very Hollywood productions.
Der Spiegel, one of the most anti-American periodicals in the world today, is covering the Bush administration's ass? Please.
ReplyDeleteTotally off-topic, but after 9/11 the New York Times demanded the government track terrorist financing. Gotta love hypocrisy.
I don't see the connection between 9/11 and the Kuwait incident.
ReplyDeleteLike the others, nesnyc has no knowledge of logical fallacies.
Non sequitur in this case.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI wonder when any of the geniuses who post here will realize they use circular logic.
ReplyDelete"Don't trust the video because they're hired by the CIA/ are CIA agents."
"Oh yeah, how do you know?"
"Because they were hired by the CIA/are CIA agents. It's a fact"
If you can find anywhere where we say the government has never lied than your Kuwait non sequitur might have a point.
ReplyDeletethen*
ReplyDeleteThe difference between scientific theory and conspiracy theory is that scientific theories are disprovable. Conspiracy theories will just claim "it was faked" anytime the evidence contradicts them.
ReplyDeleteYou could use that argument for anything.
Apollo 11 landed on the moon - it was faked.
Hitler killed 11 million people in death camps - it was faked
The earth is round - it was faked
Issac Newton proved the theory of gravity - also faked
(and I've done a search on what the "British source" of the same lies were and theres no good reason to believe its not the same liars involved. How ridiculous to say that the British told our government something and wouldn't say what the source was or that our government didn't ask, "Whats your source?")
ReplyDeleteDo your search again, because you are wrong. The Butler report, which spent a hell of a lot more time on this issue than you did, did an investigation and found the evidence was credible. This was years aftar the documents (which were never used by anyone for anything) were shown to be forgeries.
By Joan logic, if I typed up a fake bronze star citation for John Murtha and mailed it to the Washington Post, and they immediately figured out it was a forgery, this would prove that Murtha never earned a bronze star.
Bizarre.
And on and on. Piles of lies. They think nothing of lying to us
ReplyDeleteIt's logically fallacious to believe something is a lie just because a source lied before. You can suspect it, but you need facts to buttress your points.
And if you can tell me who forged the documents you get bonus points (hint: wasn't America).
that about 30% of the population would still support Bush if he broke into their home and urinated on their children
ReplyDeleteS-s-s-trawman.
I support Bush (weak as he is on the GWoT) because he's the toughest of the candidates. I don't support him on virtually anything domestically (then again, that's true with every president since FDR for me).
The Butler report said it was credible but we all know it was a lie!!
ReplyDeleteSee, this is why we say that conspiracy theorists are a religion, you base things on what you feel and believe, I base it on what I can prove.
I am not so arrogant as to claim I know more about the inner workings of British Intelligence than the British government does. I have never worked in British Intelligence, it would be dishonest to pretend I knew more about this than they did. Apparently you don't have those restrictions.
Are you sure that you aren't the one hearing voices in your head?
ReplyDeleteThe Republicans are throwing around the word "treason" by the NY Times lately! Now thats arrogance.
ReplyDeleteIt was absolutely ridiculous for them to reveal the finance tracking program...especially since right after the attack the NEW YORK TIMES CALLED FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO DO THAT EXACT THING. Without question it was treasonous to reveal that information.