Saturday, August 05, 2006

More Examples of Lefty Gatekeeping

Jeez, I'm starting to like these lefty gatekeepers:

V911T Email to Camp Democracy 08/02/2006:
Hi,
I am co-founder of Veterans for 9/11 Truth. I am interested in the $100
covers tabling Sept. 5 - 21, the entire camp.

This paragraph, "Note Regarding Tabling:" on the page
campdemocracy.org/organization seems to say that some handouts and
literature etc could be prohibited. I would like that clarified
before we get the table if you could please.

Thank you,
Alfons

Response from Camp Democracy 08/04/2006:
Hi - Thanks for writing.

The Camp's themes are : End War: Peace, nonviolence, accountability, and
impeachment | Human Rights: Civil Rights, Immigrants Rights, Workers
Rights, Women's Rights, Voting Rights, Katrina | End
Corporate Welfare, Meet Human Needs: Healthcare/ Energy/ Education/
Environment | Communications and Creativity: Hands-on Media and Arts
Training.

The Camp, by a decision of its steering committee, is not including 9/11
conspiracy themes, and is not accepting sponsorship from 9/11 conspiracy
groups. 9/11 conspiracy materials may not be sold, or given away for a
donation, at the event.

Best wishes,

Charlie Jenks

V911t Reply to Camp Democracy 08/05/2006:
Dear Mr. Jenkins,

First, we are not a 9/11 Conspiracy Group, we are a 9/11 Truth Group. If you want to send an email to a 9/11 Conspiracy Group, I think their email is whitehouse@whitehouse.gov

I am very surprised that you are banning speech about 9/11 Truth. Is there something that you don't understand about the freefall collapse of Building 7, or the bombs in the WTC towers? If we can help you to understand the evidence we will be more than happy to help.

I feel that Camp Democracy owes an explanation to us, and the people of America. Can you please explain your book burning/banning posture?

Respectfully,
Alfons v911t


:)

142 comments:

  1. First, we are not a 9/11 Conspiracy Group, we are a 9/11 Truth Group. If you want to send an email to a 9/11 Conspiracy Group, I think their email is whitehouse@whitehouse.gov

    They're in some serious denial.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel that Camp Democracy owes an explanation to us, and the people of America.


    GIMME GIMME GIMME GIMME!

    Someone never learned to play well with others....

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you want to send an email to a 9/11 Conspiracy Group, I think their email is whitehouse@whitehouse.gov

    LOL! Send one to DoD too since they are the ones who lied to the 9/11 commission.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Errr do you even read what you link?

    I'll wait for your reply, you probably have a Klan meeting tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Errr do you even read what you link?

    I most certainly did. It's called "spin control" and as usual, the Times tries to cover the asses of their masters in the Gov.

    The Pentagon initially suggested that the North American Aerospace Defense Command, the military’s domestic air-defense operation, had reacted quickly to reports of the hijackings and had been prepared to intercept and possibly shoot down one of the hijacked planes.

    The Sept. 11 commission, which uncovered the inconsistencies in the Pentagon’s account


    - and -

    Norad demonstrated widespread confusion within the military on the morning of the attacks, with many air-defense commanders uncertain whether the reports of the hijackings were part of an unannounced military exercise.

    The truth is there, you just have to dig it out. Now, wasn't that "Osama" smart to have planned these "attacks" during the no confirmed "drills" that were going on?

    ReplyDelete
  6. the Times tries to cover the asses of their masters in the Gov.

    You truly are the dumbest person I've ever come across on the internet.

    Do you forget this is the same New York Times that revealed a secret government operation that was cutting off terrorist funding, even after government officials pleaded for them to not publish it? I guess so, moron.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Now, wasn't that "Osama" smart to have planned these "attacks" during the no confirmed "drills" that were going on?

    The drill DOESN'T MATTER. We would've have reacted any better without the training exercises. How you people function in the world is beyond me.

    Again, read other threads. We have people who actually served or are serving. These things happen all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We have people who actually served or are serving.

    The blind leading the blind?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Do you forget this is the same New York Times that revealed a secret government operation that was cutting off terrorist funding, even after government officials pleaded for them to not publish it? I guess so, moron.

    Well. If you actually believe there is some kind of tension between the "press" and the government, you deserve what you get. What you see is a "sacrifice" for the greater "good" and all the theater that's "fit to print." Puuhleeezz.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The drill DOESN'T MATTER. We would've have reacted any better without the training exercises.

    That's your twisted opinion. They guys that were there say and were tapped saying otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well. If you actually believe there is some kind of tension between the "press" and the government, you deserve what you get. What you see is a "sacrifice" for the greater "good" and all the theater that's "fit to print." Puuhleeezz.

    Ok, keep ignoring that the NYT published something they shouldn't have after the government pleaded for them not to.

    How's the war against the "Zionists" (*cough* Jews) going, Mein Fuhrer?

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's your twisted opinion.

    No, it's not my opinion. It's a fact. We wouldn't have suddenly had two hundred airplanes at the ready - all fueled up and armed to the teeth.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The arrogant tone of these people is just comical given what they're spouting.

    It only sounds arrogant because you disagree and have nothing really to refute was is being said.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This is where you know you're dealing with someone who's insane - he thinks one of the most consistently anti-Bush papers is actually a bunch of government schills.

    ReplyDelete
  15. No, it's not my opinion. It's a fact. We wouldn't have suddenly had two hundred airplanes at the ready - all fueled up and armed to the teeth.

    The only facts are that there were indeed hundreds of military planes in the air at the time, some as far away as Alaska and the "No Fly Zone" in Iraq that should have been patrolling the US like the regularly do. Damn! That Osama was good wasn't he? Even the NORAD people didn't know these "drills" were going on.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It only sounds arrogant because you disagree and have nothing really to refute was is being said.

    Nessie, you ignore any facts used to refute your claims. When you start going "oh yeah I was wrong there", then people won't insult your arrogance and ignorance (which you have in about equal measure).

    ReplyDelete
  17. The only facts are that there were indeed hundreds of military planes in the air at the time, some as far away as Alaska and the "No Fly Zone" in Iraq that should have been patrolling the US like the regularly do.

    You can't be serious, right?

    ReplyDelete
  18. anti-Bush papers is actually a bunch of government schills.

    Ever hear of Judith Miller? For goodness sakes, the OSP lives at the TIMES dammit! Like I said, the blind leading the blind.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Ever hear of Judith Miller? For goodness sakes, the OSP lives at the TIMES dammit! Like I said, the blind leading the blind.

    So Kerry and Clinton, and pretty much every Democrat were Bush shills, too?

    Nessie, know what hindsight is? I'm pretty sure it's 20/20. It's like you morons have never heard of that before.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Next he'll quote Indymedia.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So Kerry and Clinton, and pretty much every Democrat were Bush shills, too?

    I see you need a mental beat down:

    Kerry - Yale, Skull n Bones, Iran/Contra cover guy.
    Clinton - Mena, CIA, Drug Running, papa Bush's close friend

    Shills is too kind. These guys are opposing wings of the same bird of prey.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I see you need a mental beat down

    That was the sorriest mental beatdown in the history of humanity.

    That Skull and Bones bull[crap] conspiracy nonsense doesn't fly with me. It's a frat, pal. Take off the tinfoil hat and live in the real world.

    There's no Illuminati, no New World Order, no globalists, no Vast Zionist Conspiracy, none of it. The world is a fairly boring place.

    ReplyDelete
  23. You people really are retarted.

    My case proven. When intellectual ammo is gone fear and smear take a hold. And in this case, looks like you fear the mentally handicapped. Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  24. The world is a fairly boring place.

    Yeah well, go stand in the middle of Beirut for a few hours and report back!

    ReplyDelete
  25. BTW, only the weak minded ingest the "left vs. right" paradigm bullcrap.

    ReplyDelete
  26. My case proven. When intellectual ammo is gone fear and smear take a hold. And in this case, looks like you fear the mentally handicapped. Good job!


    ...fear. Right. We're not afraid of you people. It just gets annoying disproving all your points over and over again while you cling to your religious beliefs with the convictions of a zealot. It's like you idiots think we do this to defend the government. How do you explain me going to creationist forums and destroying them? The president believes in that nonsense.

    Yeah well, go stand in the middle of Beirut for a few hours and report back!

    Funny you bring that up:

    What do you think of this obviously doctored photo of Beirut?

    ReplyDelete
  27. BTW, only the weak minded ingest the "left vs. right" paradigm bullcrap.

    Nesnyc calling anyone weak minded is the height of irony.

    Just so you're aware, you fall under the "far right" part of the spectrum.

    ReplyDelete
  28. How's the war against the "Zionists" (*cough* Jews) going, Mein Fuhrer?

    Very good! Unbeknownst to the average yokel in Amerikkka, the real rising tide of "anti-Talmudism" will be the conduit to the eventual eradication of the Zionist regime. They are playing the script exactly as written. The war of annihilation will commence shortly.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Just so you're aware, you fall under the "far right" part of the spectrum.

    You can classify me if it makes you feel better. But I most identify with the "non-bullshit" version of events and those who take power away from the status quo.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Again, nesnyc, there's no such thing as a New World Order.

    Any basic student of political history could tell you a one world government would never work.

    ReplyDelete
  31. You can classify me if it makes you feel better. But I most identify with the "non-bullshit" version of events and those who take power away from the status quo.

    An anti-semite, anti-government nut who believes 9/11 was orchestrated by the government without any evidence and with generous use of logical fallacies. That's why you're far right.

    ReplyDelete
  32. How many structural engineers or CD experts have you consulted in forming your opinions?

    What do they know about military drills on that day "Osama" didn't?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Again, nesnyc, there's no such thing as a New World Order.

    Come on. Daddy Bush and Gary Hart both said they wanted it! You calling them liars?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Come on. Daddy Bush and Gary Hart both said they wanted it! You calling them liars?

    You do understand there differences between a new world order and the (dramatic music) New World Order...don't you? Any time there's a shift in world powers (Battle of Trafalgar, Great War, World War II, Cold War, etc) it's literally a "new world order". The (dramatic music) New World Order connotes a one world government police state.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Any basic student of political history could tell you a one world government would never work.

    Right, it will never work, but that doesn't stop "them" from trying. But those "students" have obviously been trained on propaganda and therefore could never reasonably come to a substantial conclusion of current world affairs.

    ReplyDelete
  36. You do understand there differences between a new world order and the (dramatic music) New World Order...don't you? Any time there's a shift in world powers (Battle of Trafalgar, Great War, World War II, Cold War, etc) it's literally a "new world order". The (dramatic music) New World Order connotes a one world government police state.

    The CFR ala Bush and G. Hart want the latter. Believe me, they know the difference. Why would they need the [pre]written Patriot Act if they were talking about your first version? Damn, wet behind the ears doesn’t even come close for you.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Answer the question, you coward.

    You first.

    ReplyDelete
  38. im sorry but whenever someone mentions the new world order

    That would be your friend shawn there. I never did :)

    ReplyDelete
  39. Right, it will never work, but that doesn't stop "them" from trying. But those "students" have obviously been trained on propaganda and therefore could never reasonably come to a substantial conclusion of current world affairs.


    This coming from a guy whose education probably ended in the public arena and who couldn't interpret world events if his life depended on it.

    Because of nationalism (which is the root cause of terrorism, by the way), a one world government will never work.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Believe me, they know the difference.

    In Bush's speech he was referencing the shift of power when the Soviet Union collapsed. As I already stated, you have blinders on and couldn't interpret history and/or current events if your life depended on it.

    That would be your friend shawn there. I never did :)

    You believe in it.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I believe I asked first.

    My thoughts on "structural engineers" is written in this blog someplace (archives?) and I really don't want to rehash that. So, I answered you before you even asked the question, now, your turn.

    ReplyDelete
  42. chf, nesnyc believes that any evidence for the "official story" is either planted/faked/or the members of these bodies are shills for the machine.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Oh, by the way, that's called circular logic.

    ReplyDelete
  44. In Bush's speech

    On 9/11 correct? :D

    ReplyDelete
  45. or the members of these bodies are shills for the machine.

    or too cowardly to speak up for fear of retaliation, blacklisting and loss of income.

    ReplyDelete
  46. or too cowardly to speak up for fear of retaliation, blacklisting and loss of income.

    Nesnyc, absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Try again.

    ReplyDelete
  47. You're pathetic, dude.

    So you're saying "structural engineers" really don't know why military "drills" took place on 9/11 correct? My conclusion exactly :)

    ReplyDelete
  48. Nesnyc, absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Try again.

    Then how come you guys still believe Osama is alive? Pot calling the kettle? :D

    ReplyDelete
  49. Then how come you guys still believe Osama is alive? Pot calling the kettle? :D

    Well, since he was alive and we have no evidence he died, why should we assume he's dead? That's illogical, but par for the course in the nesnyc school of thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  50. OK tell you what. How about a few of you CTers get together and take a course on structural engineering. Then when you graduate, see if you still feel the same way.

    Look at what you wrote. Can you figure out that to be "trained in a discipline" creates blinders on you that you cannot look past? How come the greatest inventions and innovations are always created in garages and by the "lay" person? How many of those eggheads really contributed society. I agree, they are good at the details in their "discipline" but always fail to see the bigger picture.

    ReplyDelete
  51. we have no evidence he died

    Not accurate. There are various people that claim he's dead and they are in a position to know. That would be poo-poo for the US Gov though since they would have to manufacture another boogeyman and why they still release those faked tapes of him confessing and all.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Can you figure out that to be "trained in a discipline" creates blinders on you that you cannot look past?

    Hehe. So the only way to see Da Truff, is to be ignorant.

    Well, at least you're finaly admitting it.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Watson, speaking at a conference of law enforcement officials at a downtown hotel, quickly emphasized that he had no evidence that bin Laden was dead

    First off, you don't seem to read your own links. Second, did you check the date? We know he was alive since 2002 (I know you probably think all those videos are fake, but to those of use with working brain cells it's obviously him or his identical twin).

    ReplyDelete
  54. yeah, the WTC, Empire State Building, Sears Tower, Eiffel Tower, they were all designed by "lay" peopel in their garages

    Not what I said. All the above wouldn't be able to know or reason why military drills where taking place as the real hijackings were because that wouldn't compute to them. In that, they would actually believe the government story and figure out how to make the facts "fit" that equation. They're good at that stuff you know.

    ReplyDelete
  55. In that, they would actually believe the government story and figure out how to make the facts "fit" that equation.

    Odd, nesnyc talks about how his side figures out things and then projects it onto us.

    You're the people who come a predetermined conclusion and then fit the evidence to match that. I believe it was alex who said it best - I can just picture you watching the WTC on fire going "Those damn Jews are at it again."

    ReplyDelete
  56. Goddamit kid. Did you forget to wear your safety helmet before climbing down into the basement? You seem even more retarded than usual....

    Maybe structural engineer can't explain to you why military drills were scheduled for 9/11 (although they should be able to make an accurate guess), but I can. We do drills all the time. When we're not out fighting wars, we practice to fight wars. We do it often. Very often. Seing as there are multiple exercises going on every single day in some part of north america, it would have been EXTREMELY unusual if there had been no exercises at all going on when 9/11 occured. As it stands, it takes a special sort of lunatic to see these exercises as suspicious.

    ReplyDelete
  57. I can just picture you watching the WTC on fire going "Those damn Jews are at it again."

    Nope. I actually thought it might be McVeigh types trying to coup the US government like they wrote in the Turner Diaries. But wanted to wait for all the facts but that was my first thoughts.

    But when some of my friends said it was for the UNOCOL pipeline in Afghanistan right after they fingered Bin Laden, I laughed! That is, until we attacked Afghanistan. Then I started to do some reading and the rest is history.

    ReplyDelete
  58. it would have been EXTREMELY unusual if there had been no exercises at all going on when 9/11 occured.

    Making it "fit?" :D

    I present "Vigilant Guardian"

    The publicly available mass media articles about these exercises state that they were similar enough to the actual events that top NORAD personnel were confused, not sure if 9/11 was "part of the drill" or a real world event.

    So when's the last time a drill like this took place you were saying?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Nice to see the level of debate has climbed up :)

    Nesync;

    I don't know where to begin. I probably won't say much, as I am coming to realize it is useless to argue with the "truthers".

    I am offended, as a professional, with a high level of education, at what you have to say about those of us who have dedicated years and years of our lives to studying in a particular field.

    rather than ask you, why don't we ask the general public who they would trust more to form an opinion on the matters of building structure and colapse...laymen, or structural engineers.

    Oh but wait, if you are like the average "truther" you probably feel the average person is too dumb to see your genius, to see your amazing take on things. That is part of what makes the CT movement so attractive, is that you feel you have some secret knowledge that others don't, and that others can't fathom...only you and your ilk can.

    Now before you tell me to "wake up" or that I am just "Blind to the Truth", why don't you give us a list of who you think are the best people to talk on the various aspects of the 9/11 tragedy?

    I'll sit here and wait?

    ReplyDelete
  60. Being uneducated makes you SMARTER!

    Yep. Look at when they tried to "educate" Winston in 1984. That's what I'm talking about. There is no "education" only indoctrination centers.

    ReplyDelete
  61. its an annual excercise

    Well that sure breaks the back of the "frequent" theory.

    ReplyDelete
  62. because global guardian is the ONLY excercise the military ever does, right?

    I don't know if it's the only one but it surely doesn't happen everyday as Alex is trying to say, silly.

    ReplyDelete
  63. spoken like a true idiot

    Takes one to know one? :D

    ReplyDelete
  64. BTW if it was so unusual shouldnt there be alot of military personel in the truth movement? they cant all be part of the coverup, right?

    No, there not part of any cover up. There really is no cover up. Only people at the very top know what happened and the rest follow behind. It's called "hive mentality" or "lemminghood" and the people pulling the shots count on this to perpetuate the lie. It's all quite simple.

    ReplyDelete
  65. what do you propose the military do with their time when they arent at war?
    Sit around and play cards all day?


    Ah, shoot down hijacked planes that are going to crash into building? Gee, that was easy. You sure it wasn't a trick question? LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  66. No, there not part of any cover up. There really is no cover up. Only people at the very top know what happened and the rest follow behind. It's called "hive mentality" or "lemminghood" and the people pulling the shots count on this to perpetuate the lie. It's all quite simple.

    Except it wouldn't work at all. History's greatest conspiracy - Operation Fortitude/Overlord - was known to thousands of people. You morons saying "only a few need to know" doesn't fly. It isn't how the real world works.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Dylan,

    You were offered HOW MUCH, and you turned it down?

    Take the money - I get more than Jason

    ReplyDelete
  68. Nesnyc;

    touche on the name claling, but it helps me to vent a little.

    I am still waiting for your reply...scroll up to look at the end of my first post to you, for the question I asked.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Nesnyc still hasn't responded to the doctored photo from Beirut.

    ReplyDelete
  70. does this mean if you were in a situation to blow the lid off the conspiracy or just "follow along" youd be a good little sheep, right?

    It all depends. Firstly, I don't think I would have ever been recruited to be part of this. Secondly, if I was indeed part of it, how much of it would I have actually known? You do understand these types of things are very compartmentalized and coordinated from above. That's how to keep these types of things under wraps. But I suspect the people coordinating were paid very well. I mean 2.1 trillion dollars doesn't just get "lost" from DoD and it not land someplace. I'm sure the hands got greased enough to keep mouths shut. And those who get too close would certainly be liquidated. Come on guys, use a little imagination here. A caveman terrorist could never do what was done on 9/11.

    ReplyDelete
  71. still waiting....

    ok, i will restate it...

    Nesnyc;

    Given you don't think the experts in given fields are the right people to weigh in on the events of 9/11, in terms of evidence and opinion, who do YOU think should provide the evidence and opinions on the 9/11 acttacks. Who should the people believe when asking questions on building collapse, or Explosions, if not the engineers etc..

    ReplyDelete
  72. Nesnyc still hasn't responded to the doctored photo from Beirut.

    What about it? People a dead in Lebanon in general because of rabid Zionist aggression. So what if a few pictures get doctored along the way. Lebanon is ruined and now the Zionists can launch their war with Syria.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Come on guys, use a little imagination here. A caveman terrorist could never do what was done on 9/11.

    When he has hundreds of millions of dollars and nationalistic and religious fervor driving his devotees he can.

    Most suicide terrorists volunteer for the job.

    A single man (with almost no support) destroyed a federal building in Oklahoma City, I know you guys don't have minds for history, so I thought I'd point that out.

    ReplyDelete
  74. What about it? People a dead in Lebanon in general because of rabid Zionist aggression. So what if a few pictures get doctored along the way. Lebanon is ruined and now the Zionists can launch their war with Syria.

    So his true colors show. Fake, but accurate, eh? Anti-Israel propaganda is just fine and dandy.

    I know you probably don't buy it because you ignore reality, but Israel had every right to attack a country who kidnapped two of their soldiers (in Israel). Hizbollah could've just released the soldiers, and it would've ended the day it began. Under international law, everyone who dies in the war is on their hands.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Who should the people believe when asking questions on building collapse, or Explosions, if not the engineers etc..

    Does what you say work in a court of law? How come Juries are picked at random from the population to weigh evidence? Wouldn't an all "expert" jury defeat the purpose?

    ReplyDelete
  76. Does what you say work in a court of law? How come Juries are picked at random from the population to weigh evidence? Wouldn't an all "expert" jury defeat the purpose?

    OJ walked free, y'know.

    ReplyDelete
  77. How come Juries are picked at random from the population to weigh evidence?

    How come lawyers get to select the juries and ensure no lunatics with pre-conceived biases end up on them?

    How come uneducated lunatics like you don't get to present evidence at a trial?

    ReplyDelete
  78. Under international law, everyone who dies in the war is on their hands.

    You just nullified the holyco$t :D

    ReplyDelete
  79. You just nullified the holyco$t :D

    That didn't even make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  80. PS the portion of the Geneva Convention that places the blame for civilian deaths on the armed forces hiding among them wasn't enacted till after WW2.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Oh, and just as an example, I remember taking part in an exercise once where we were acting in an aid-to-civil-power role. My unit practiced securing and entering houses in a large city and apprehending suspected IED makers and suicide bombers.

    A couple days later, the local police forces with the assistance of a special forces unit, did the same thing when they aprehended the 17 Canadian terror suspects.

    IT'S A CONSPIRACY!

    ReplyDelete
  82. I am glad you brought that analogy up Nesnyc.

    In a court of law ther are "expert" witnesses, which the law treats as such, because they have been accepted by the laws of society as experts in the particular field they are chosen to testify on....

    In a 9/11 trial, who would the courts choose to give testimony and evidence with regards to a complex issue such as building collapse....hmmm, I wonder....you....Nope....me....nope...a structural engineer....now you got it...

    thanks for bringing up the analogy...I wouldn't have thought of it right away, but it was the best way to make my point.

    ReplyDelete
  83. In a court of law ther are "expert" witnesses

    Well, in the case of the 9/11 conspiracy, the "experts" have spoken and a lot of us potential jurors can smell those lies a mile away.

    ReplyDelete
  84. suddenly got very quiet in here :)

    Don't worry, I was busy doing something else, I'm still here :) This site looked dead today and I decided to grace it with my presence one more time.

    ReplyDelete
  85. you arent a potential jurer, no one on this blog is

    Well, I sort of agree. And, with recent polls showing more and more believing 911 to be an inside job that pool of potential pro-government jurors is getting smaller and smaller all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Ah yes, you and your useless polls.

    Go out on the street tomorrow and conduct a poll. Ask 100 people whether they're ever jaywalked. Then the next day you can publish an article stating "In a recent poll, 100% of Americans admitted to being criminals".

    ReplyDelete
  87. Ah yes, you and your useless polls.

    Only "useless" because they nullify your "experts" as hard as they've tried to push their fantasy on us.

    ReplyDelete
  88. what was it 80% of americans couldnt find iraq on a map? does that mean iraq doesnt exist?

    No, that mean mission accomplished for the indoctrination centers. However, government lies are more closely scrutinized as liars are more easily identified than countries on a map.

    ReplyDelete
  89. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Keep talking asshole. It's obvious you don't have either the balls nor the competence to ever actually DO anything. All you'll ever be is a source of hot air.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I have nothing further to say to anyone who considers Structural Engineers "Unqualified" to speak as experts on Skyscraper collapse.

    ReplyDelete
  92. I have nothing further to say

    Thank You.

    ReplyDelete
  93. you've admited that you're not qualified and have no intension of either educating yourself or consulting those who are experts.

    You've basically just admited that you're a complete ignoramus.


    We're all born with the same equipment. Weather we choose to use it or allow other to do the thinking for us is a matter of personal choice. You can be lead and be deceived or you can take charge and filter out the bullshit. The choice is totally yours.

    ReplyDelete
  94. What makes you think I’m not educated? Regardless, no matter how much "education" or indoctrination you may get, it won’t help you acquire common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Without educaction you end up spouting crap about free-fall collapses, thermite and "pull it."

    There's a lot to the simplification you just regurgitated there. A lot of this can be backed up by science and a lot of folks are dedicating their efforts to that. We can get lost in those details and miss the bigger and simpler picture to understand the mechanics of 911.

    I put a simple question here and all of you with ALL your education couldn't come up with an answer. The question how was "Osama" so lucky to have planned his "attacks" on the same day as military drills basically paralleling the attacks? What are the odds? Go ahead, take and "educated" guess. No need to get into thermite or free fall or other stuff that requires details and loss of the bigger scenario. I bet none of you are capable, period.

    ReplyDelete
  96. another question to ask, is how often are anti-hijacking excercises conducted? if this is a weekly or even monthly thing then a coincidence isnt so unlikely after all

    So far, on 911 there has been reported up to 12 different exercises all encompassing one or more areas of the actual attack. Again, what are the odds? It's really simple. People are convicted on the odds that their DNA is one billion to one theirs and only theirs. The odds that the same kinds of hijacking and attack drills were occurring on 911 has to be up there in the billion to one range.

    ReplyDelete
  97. In order to do that you physical evidence and expert corroboration. That's how strong cases get built.

    So why on Earth do you people insist Osama did it? Flimsy isn't even the right word to describe how incredibly weak the case is against him.

    ReplyDelete
  98. So why on Earth do you people insist Osama did it? Flimsy isn't even the right word to describe how incredibly weak the case is against him.

    Well, sure, if you take for granted that he's a CIA spy, or that his videotaped confessions were faked, then yes the case could be considered a bit flimsy. However, you gotta be popping WAAAAAY too manny whacky-pills to get into that sort of mindset.

    ReplyDelete
  99. so what part of the attack did global guardian and northern vigilence encompass? did the russians bomb the WTC?

    a National Reconnaissance Office exercise on September 11, in which a small corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure[1] The NRO, whose name was classified until 1992,[2] is the branch of the Department of Defense in charge of spy satellites.

    Global Guardian, an annual exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to the United States Strategic Command. It had been running for several days. The exercise allegedly involved a simulated Russian bomber attack.[4] Global Guardian is performed in conjunction with Vigilant Guardian, the annual training exercise (usually occurring in October) conducted by NORAD as well as exercises under the direction of Air Combat Command (Crown Vigilance) and US Space Command (Apollo Guardian).[5] "Vigilant Guardian" is a HQ-sponsored CPx (Command Post Exercise), meaning it is conducted in offices and with computers, but without actual planes in the air. All of NORAD was involved in "Vigilant Guardian."[6] However, it did include radar injects, or false blips, which could explain the FAA's observation of a 'phantom flight 11' on FAA radar well after the plane struck the WTC and after NORAD claims to have called off all war games.

    Vigilant Warrior, a NORAD live-fly (confirmed by its second name 'warrior') exercise mentioned in Richard Clarke's Against All Enemies page 4-5 (possibly the same as Vigilant Guardian, or possibly the complementary "offense" or "red team" portion of the drill involving real planes acting as simulated hijacked plane)

    Operation Northern Vigilance, which involved deploying fighter jets to locations in Alaska and northern Canada. According to the Toronto Star: " Part of this exercise is pure simulation, but part is real world: NORAD is keeping a close eye on the Russians, who have dispatched long-range bombers to their own high north on a similar exercise." Planned

    Operation Northern Guardian "In late August 2001, two-thirds of the 27th Fighter Squadron are sent overseas. Six of the squadron's fighters and 115 people go to Turkey to enforce the no-fly zone over northern Iraq as part of Operation Northern Watch. Another six fighters and 70 people are sent to Iceland to participate in "Operation Northern Guardian." These

    TRIPOD II, a joint FEMA and Department of Justice biowarfare vaccination exercise, scheduled for September 12 at New York's Pier 29, and revealed in testimony by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the 9/11 Commission. The command center assembled at Pier 29 was used for FEMA response to the events of 9/11 after Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management offices were evacuated and later destroyed in WTC 7.

    = = = = =

    Okay, we have false blips on radar, whole sqardons away in Trukey! "Emergency" in New York and planes crashing into buildings, all on 911. What are the odds?

    Above source.

    ReplyDelete
  100. So nesnyc is out of the aryan closet, eh?

    Is there anyone in the "truth" movement who isn't a swatika swinger?

    ReplyDelete
  101. Osama admitted it on tape several times

    It's well established those tapes are fabrications from US Intelligence.

    ReplyDelete
  102. So nesnyc is out of the aryan closet, eh?

    Is there anyone in the "truth" movement who isn't a swatika swinger?


    Nice try. But we all know those "Neo Nazi" are just Zionist hoaxsters.

    ReplyDelete
  103. you have some pretty flimsy standards of "well established"

    Same as the Osama tale, no? :D

    ReplyDelete
  104. and once again, any evidence these excercises were unusual at all? any evidence this is anythign more than a coincidence?

    Well gee! Aren't those an awful LOT of coincidences? Again, what are the odds?

    ReplyDelete
  105. It's well established those tapes are fabrications from US Intelligence.

    Wrong again, Nazinyc.

    http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/lcg5.html

    How does it feel to be WTFPWNED by a stranger over the internet?

    ReplyDelete
  106. Okay, we have false blips on radar, whole sqardons away in Trukey! "Emergency" in New York and planes crashing into buildings, all on 911. What are the odds?

    A hell of a lot better than the odds of 5 D-Day codewords appearing by accident in a crossword puzzle. Yet both events happened. Since it's obvious you've been living in a hole in the ground I'll also correct you on a few other things:

    The US pretty much always has "whole squadrons" away somewhere. The ones in turkey were inforcing the Iraq no fly-zone, meaning they've been doing it since the mid 90's. So the odds of them still being there in 2001 are pretty damn good, don't you think? There were also many aircraft in Kosovo at the time. Plus a few in Canada. Some in Germany. A couple in Korea and Japan maybe. Deffinitely a few floating around the atlantic and pacific. I'm not sure about the exact deployment schedule of the US airforce, but I know they keep busy.

    There were no false blips on FAA radars. NORAD wouldn't be injecting radar blips into FAA computers.

    And, uh....well I'm not too sure exactly what else you're so surprised about. I really can't make sense of most of your drivel.

    ReplyDelete
  107. sure, if multiple confessions are flimsy

    Okay, what if there were NO fake confessions, what does that do to the case? Even FBI knows not to charge Osama with 911 since the facts have more holes than Swiss cheese.

    ReplyDelete
  108. im inclined to believe they are normal because if they werent youd be able to find a credible source saying they werent

    Okay, you're loosing focus here. What are the odds of the "terrorist" attacks of 9/11 happening on the same day as the planned "drills?" It’s quite easy. Don’t loose yourself in your own apologies and sorry assed excuses.

    ReplyDelete
  109. There aren't ANY fake confessions, Nazinyc.

    BTW, Osama is slightly outside the FBI's jurisdiction. They aren't likely to have anything to do with Bin Ladens persuit and capture.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Okay, you're loosing focus here. What are the odds of the "terrorist" attacks of 9/11 happening on the same day as the planned "drills?"

    100%

    Wargames and excersizes are constantly being conducted by the military. It's all part of that "to prevent war, one must prepare for it" thing.

    ReplyDelete
  111. http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/lcg5.html

    Ah ha ha ha, I can't believe you people actually take the viewer's guide crap seriously. Good comic relief though. I feel sorry for the dude that made that junk up though. All for not.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Okay, you're loosing focus here. What are the odds of the "terrorist" attacks of 9/11 happening on the same day as the planned "drills?"

    Well, considering that Global Guardian is more than a week long, at WORST the odds would be about 52:1 against. If you consider the fact that NORAD conducts more than one exercise per year, the number drops to something more like 10:1.

    ReplyDelete
  113. you generally dont charge someone with something until you have them in custody

    Well, they pinned the Kenya bombings on him all with him not even being there. Guess that blows your theory out of the water.

    ReplyDelete
  114. FYI here are some exercises which NORTHCOM conducts on a yearly basis:

    Amalgam Fabric Brave
    Amalgam Falcon Brave
    Amalgam Fencing Brave
    Amalgam Virgo
    Amalgam Warrior
    Amazon Condor
    Determined Promise
    Vigilant Guardian
    Vigilant Overview
    Unified Defense
    United Defense

    In addition to those, there are intermittent exercises which do not occur annualy or quarterly, but are a one-time occurence made to fill a specific need.

    Long story short, Nessie, you're an idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  115. why cant you tell me the odds?

    Astranomical / 1

    Okay? Consider the US mainland has never been attacked and then how the drills coincided almost exactly as to how the attack carried out. Hummm.. Even Tripod in NYC? Give me a freakin' break.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Astranomical / 1

    No, as I demonstrated, the worst possible number you could claim is 52:1, not "astronomical:1"

    Okay? Consider the US mainland has never been attacked and then how the drills coincided almost exactly as to how the attack carried out.

    That's the whole point of drills, dumbass. We anticipate likey scenarios, and then rehears our response to them. What did you expect NORAD to be practicing for? An invasion of Pink Unicorns with Gold Helmets? A swarm of flying monkeys with rambo knives? The accidental release of the general population of an insane assylum? (ok, well, judging by your behaviour, maybe they should have been practicing for that last one...)

    ReplyDelete
  117. Stop making excuses. It's simple, 9/11 was carried out on the backs of the "drills" to help it achieve what it achieved. Simple. No coincidences here, it was planned.

    I live in NYC, I can tell you we don't have Tripod exercises every day. The last bio-warfare type of drill we had was like a decade ago (other than tripod).

    Basically, you're making excuses on blind faith that there are criminal elements within YOUR government that carried out these crimes. Get over it, that's what happened. Time to grow up and face reality.

    ReplyDelete
  118. That's the whole point of drills, dumbass. We anticipate likey scenarios,

    Damn, you people are DENSE! There are 365 days of the year, 911's don't happen all the time and neither do the "drills." Wake up!

    ReplyDelete
  119. contrary to the opinions of most new yorkers, there are other cities in the US, chicago had a bio-warfare drill or two as well in 98 or 99, so it seems these type of excercises may be rather common

    Very good! Now factor in Tripod just happened in NYC out of the thousands of cities across the US and you can put those odds up there in the Astronomical range. You just proved my point dead on. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  120. right, the military conducts excercises for 1 day a year and sits on there asses for the other 364 days

    Yeah, what are the chances of these things intersecting? Nil.

    ReplyDelete
  121. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  122. your the one making assumptions on the blind faith that the govt is "out to get you"

    Aren't you the one who thinks an Arab caveman is out to get you? LOL..

    ReplyDelete
  123. coincidences are not evidence of a conspiracy

    That's what I'm saying. The odds are too great for this to be any coincidence. It was planned! These are anything but coincidences. You guys are the ones calling them coincidences but I have clearly showed you they could not be.

    ReplyDelete
  124. then explain lincoln/kennedy, surely those odds are far too high for it to be anythign other than planned

    None of those facts affect a common target so it's interesting that there could be all those similarities but as far as affecting a common target (same place same time) it is pretty much a bad analogy to the 911 drills.

    ReplyDelete
  125. Damn, you people are DENSE! There are 365 days of the year, 911's don't happen all the time and neither do the "drills." Wake up!

    What are you fucking blind? Shit like this makes me want to throttle you. I'll review since you've obviously chosen to ignore the evidence once again:

    Global guardian was a week long exercise.

    In addition, NORCOM runs all of these exercises on a yearly basis if not more often:

    Amalgam Fabric Brave
    Amalgam Falcon Brave
    Amalgam Fencing Brave
    Amalgam Virgo
    Amalgam Warrior
    Amazon Condor
    Determined Promise
    Vigilant Guardian
    Vigilant Overview
    Unified Defense
    United Defense

    All of them take a minimum of 3 days, and go up to a week. Several of them occur twice a year instead of only once. So what we end up with is roughly 14 exercises, running for an average of 5 days each. Meaning NORCOM every year spends 70 days conducting exercises. That means the no matter when a terror attack occurs, there's at least a 1 in 5 chance that NORCOM will be conducting an exercise.

    Ofcourse, NORCOM is only one organization. I can guarantee you 100% for certain that as we speak right now there are at least 3 exercises going on in North America. I can say that about every single other year of the day too, except maybe Christmas when there would be only 1 or 2.

    ReplyDelete
  126. And not only can I say that about every other year of the day, but every other day of the year too!

    I think I'm picking up your mental disorder. Getting all lysdexic and shit.

    ReplyDelete
  127. so basicaly your saying coincidences are ok as long as you arent predisposed to seeing a conspiracy there

    Say you have a string of murders and all have been killed with their shoelaces in the same part of the same city. Chances are that conspiracy to murder people was committed by the same person correct? Now, going by your analogy, murders committed in the 1800's also had the hallmarks of the shoelace killer, would it be the same person? Just to clarify since you seem to be loosing your focus.

    ReplyDelete
  128. but im tired, so im gonna go make sure theres no jews hiding under my bed and that dick cheney isnt in my closet and go to bed

    Check for Osama too, I hear he's a real head case... Nighty, night.

    ReplyDelete
  129. Yeah, check for Osama! He's a CIA spy!

    No, wait, he's dead!

    No, he's on dyalisis!

    Uhm, no, I mean he's a CIA agent!

    And the hijackers are alive!

    But there were no hijackers....

    But, anyway, they're all alive!

    Except Osama.

    He's dead.

    Or on dyalisis.

    My head hurts....

    ReplyDelete
  130. Christ on a cracker, I go to bed at one in the morning and wake up and there's 80 more comments.

    ReplyDelete
  131. Nesnyc - http://judicial-inc.biz is not a reliable source. Next you're gonna link Jew Watch or David Irving's official website.

    ReplyDelete
  132. I just had to be the person to add the 200th post to this :)

    ReplyDelete
  133. Sounds like this hit nesync's central nervous system.

    He wants so desperately to be taken seriously, but even his political "brothers in arms" won't go on record associating with him and the denial-based community in their public protests.

    Now its personal - hence, the singular insanity he's spewing on this thread. Spinning and twirling to desperately grasp what's left of his religion.

    I've gone through a bowl and a half of popcorn already.

    ReplyDelete
  134. This thread has been bukkaked with stupid. :p

    ReplyDelete
  135. It truly does not look like it came from a plane. I cannot get away from that.

    Planes don't leave Wile E. Coyote punchouts in the sides of buildings.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Joey

    This particular site, is more of a commentary and debate site, than a "Prove" this or that site.

    If you are looking for reference to debunking the Pentagon missile myth, I am sure someone can point you in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
  137. I am a noob, can someone show me where this site debunks the hole in the Pentagon. It truly does not look like it came from a plane. I cannot get away from that.



    While there are sites that better address this issue, we have discussed it a couple of different times.

    http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/07/so-much-for-that-16-foot-hole.html

    ReplyDelete