Friday, May 14, 2010

Which Side Am I On?

The Troofers or the Anti-Fascists?

Obviously I side with the anti-fascists, which will cause some cognitive dissonance among our Troofer readers.

Also included was a color photo of Hitler, with runic symbols scrawled across his face and around his head. On the back of the photo were Germanic runes that spelled out the words “Destroy Yourself.”

Titrud, who is 50 years old and lives with his wife, was not surprised, nor did he call police. The letter included a calling card for Rose City Antifa, a Portland anti-racist group that recently tried to shut down an event Titrud helped organize featuring a speaker who’s been accused of anti-Semitism.

“They don’t really scare me,” Titrud says of the group. “These guys are idiots. It’s just kind of weird. Kind of creepy-weird.”


Titrud is one of the troofers:

Titrud and Calvert belong to the Portland 9/11 Truth Alliance, a group that challenges the accepted explanation for the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Some alternative theories assign Mossad a secret role in the attacks. Titrud recently removed signs on his camper, which used to read “End Wars for Oil or Israel” and “Israel, Stop Killing Peace.”


Yep, so the people sending him hate mail are on our side. Or are they just as nuts as the Almond Joy Truthers?

Some have praised Rose City Antifa for rooting out alleged racists in our midst. Others criticize the group’s zero-tolerance approach as nothing more than ideological bullying.

“They’re worse than the early colonists with the heretics, where you were removed out into the wilderness to die,” says Grace Grant, a member of the left-wing Laughing Horse Book Collective in Northeast Portland. “I don’t want to be part of that kind of community. It’s pretty heartless. I don’t know who’s setting these standards and norms.”


The precipitating event was one we noted back in September; the Portland Troofer contingent invited Valdas Anelauskas, a Holocaust Denier and 9-11 nutbar, to give a speech:

Therefore, as I see it, the "standard" version of the Holocaust history simply cannot be trusted as long as they're jailing or otherwise punishing those who question it. To make jail sentences be your response to critics is exactly the same as getting up on a rooftop and shouting as loud as you can for all to hear: "I am lying!" Is anyone supposed to believe someone who, in effect, proclaims in this way that he's lying?

VALDAS ANELAUSKAS


But what's interesting to me is the studied non-sidedness of the article in the Willamette Week. It's written like there's some sort of validity to both sides on the Holocaust, or like there's so much validity to 9-11 Troof that it forgives Holocaust Denial. Indeed the whole article seems to be about how this argument has divided the Portland activist community, instead of how it has galvanized the community against the idiots who deny 9-11 and, in the same breath, the Holocaust.

Yes, the article is stale. So is the entire "Truth Movement".

Labels: ,

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Portland Troof Alliance Invites America-Hating Holocaust Denier to Speak

Why do they always have to make it so easy for us? The Portland "Truth" Alliance is sponsoring a program on the Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism, which sounds dull as dishwater, so they decided to spice things up with an introductory lecture by Valdas Analauskas. Who?

It turns out that Valdas is a former Soviet and current American dissident, which makes him another one of those Troofers who came to the US so he could criticize it, like Luke Rudkowski, like Gypsy Taub, and several others whose names escape me at the moment. But that turns out to be one of Valdas' better qualities. He dedicated a speech he gave at the University of Oregon in 2006 to Holocaust Denier Germar Rudolf. That speech was sponsored by the Pacifica Forum, which has also hosted the dolts at the Institute for Historical Review. Here's a letter to the editor he wrote just last year:

In his rather hysterical June 20 letter, Bob Bussel decries any questioning of Holocaust history as a "profound act of intellectual fraud and moral bankruptcy," a "loathsome and repugnant REPUGNANT. That which is contrary to something else; a repugnant condition is one contrary to the contract itself; as, if I grant you a house and lot in fee, upon condition that you shall not aliens, the condition is repugnant and void. Bac. Ab. Conditions, L. monstrosity monstrosity

1. great congenital deformity.

2. a monster or teratism. ."

British writer George Orwell Noun 1. George Orwell - imaginative British writer concerned with social justice (1903-1950)
Eric Arthur Blair, Eric Blair, Orwell
..... Click the link for more information. said that "who controls the past, controls the future," and our perception of past events alsoshapes the way we look at the world around us today. The Zionists understand this, and know that the story of the Holocaust is crucial to their power.

This is why such harsh measures are being exacted against those who ask too many questions. The Holocaust history seems so shaky that governments have to actually imprison im·pris·on
tr.v. im·pris·oned, im·pris·on·ing, im·pris·ons
To put in or as if in prison; confine.


[Middle English emprisonen, from Old French emprisoner : en-
..... Click the link for more information. people who openly question it.

Today, it's becoming more like the new state religion and, as in the Inquisition, people are being locked up again for questioning even the smallest detail of dogma - no matter what the evidence, no matter what the conflicting testimony or history. Anyone who breaches this faith will be deemed a "Holocaust denier de·ni·er 1
n.
One that denies: a denier of harsh realities.

denier
Noun ," and punished accordingly.

Therefore, as I see it, the "standard" version of the Holocaust history simply cannot be trusted as long as they're jailing or otherwise punishing those who question it. To make jail sentences be your response to critics is exactly the same as getting up on a rooftop and shouting as loud as you can for all to hear: "I am lying!" Is anyone supposed to believe someone who, in effect, proclaims in this way that he's lying?

VALDAS ANELAUSKAS


Remember, these are the kinds of folks that 9-11 "Truthers" choose to associate themselves with.

Labels: ,