Dylan Lies Again
I know, I know, tell you when he says something truthful; it would certainly save a lot of time. Here's another Dylan interview (MP3 file).
When asked what was the most egregious and obvious piece of evidence of fraud in the official 9-11 theory, he cites the collapse of WTC 7. But as usual he can't go ten seconds without lying (at about 6:58):
"I mean, One Liberty Plaza was right underneath the South Tower, and that building just basically stood, standing, virtually intact, I mean granted there was some damage from the collapse but I mean the building itself didn't fall."
That's pretty easy to check. Dylan's obviously implying that One Liberty Plaza was closer ("right underneath") to the South Tower than WTC 7 was to the North Tower. But that's just plain wrong as this site plan shows.
(Click to expand photo)
You can eyeball that one, or put a ruler up against the screen. It's not hard to see that One Liberty Plaza was quite a bit farther from WTC 2 (the South Tower) than WTC 7 was from WTC 1 (the North Tower). Here I drew lines between the buildings, rotated the line between WTC 2 and One Liberty Tower 90 degrees counter-clockwise, and compared them:
Hat Tip: Gravy at the JREF forums (who does half our work for us). That link has lots more of the goofy stuff Dylan says in the interview, like:
Daniel Ott: "Do you think you're on some kind of list now?"
Dylan: "I would imagine so. I can still fly safely, so I'm not on the no-fly list, but I'd like to imagine that I'm on some list somewhere."
Update: My bad on the photo below, which I said was One Liberty Plaza:
In fact it's the Deutsche Bank Building.
Hat Tip: JREF Forums