Moron the Media Blackout
Here's a report from the center of the nutbar universe this weekend.
The press conference was overflowing with people and media. The speakers included Alex Jones, Ralph Shoenman & Barrie Zwicker, to name a few.
I was able to ask a question to the panel. I was humbled as the room broke into applause for me as I announced my name and affiliation to TvNewsLIES.org. I was overwhelmed by this because I realize that I am making a difference.
Before I posed my question I asked if there were any members of the corporate media covering the event. Nobody responded. I then asked if anyone from Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now was covering the event. Again…the room remained silent. I said that I was “not surprised!”
That dastardly news media, hiding the efforts of these brave seekers of truth!
posted by Pat @ 7:32 AM
15 comments
15 Comments:
(really, really lame I might add)
Good one, jackass.
citing unreliable sources
Well, that didn't happen in mark's but nice try.
I stopped watching after that whopper, sorry.
hahah dude you buy Zinn and Chomsky's bull (you know, whitewashing the history of Americna communists and bs about Cambodia and Afghanistan), Loose Change's bull, but you can't stand to see actual facts refute the nonsense. You're a joke, kid.
So you didn't even watch it yet making judgements?
As you didn't infringe on any copyrights, cite any unreliable sources, and backed up your statements, I don't think he watched it.
If Chomsky said it, it never happened. Same for Zinn, it is all fiction. I was fooled by all those footnotes I guess.
...uh Chomsky's stuff is based on opinions, genius. And you still defend his "silent genocide" statement, when HE said that, not the UN. The UN said 180,000 people are saved from starvation in Afghanistan every year from the American occupation. And you're still an apologist for his ridiculous Cambodia assertions.
And Zinn's book contains no notes.
Insidejob. You're a piece of work you know that? You create an entirely new blog apparently to spread the idea of someone doing a NEW LC video and then post a comment to YOUR OWN POST!
You then copy that comment and spam every recent thread on this site.
.... Wicked cool.
Here's a link that contains the authenic video of Alex Jones predicting in the Summer of 2001 a 9/11 like event to be staged with bin Laden as the Boogie Man.
Inside, you are welcome to post contrary views, but please don't spam us repeatedly with overly long rants that make it difficult for other people to read and post comments.
Please delete the spam posts you have put on just about every recent thread. If you don't then we are going to have to go to the trouble of setting up some way of moderating and deleting comments to keep individuals from being disruptive.
Thank you for your cooperation.
I am reminded of the saying in economics, "Economists have correctly predicted 7 of the last 3 recessions."
BG, you ever heard of cold reading? It's how "psychics" and "mediums" do their thing. You continually make guesses, and at least one or two are gonna stick.
with respect to my Alex Jones vid:
I'm saying this honestly:
You guys offered thoughtful and civil reponses. Thanks
As someone who believes the evidency supports the idea that bin Laden is a boogie man front as a cover for the false flag operation, I thought it was reasonable to link to Jones' vid.
The fact that James compares Jones to an economist ("predicting 9 of the last ? recessions") is a pleasant surprise (not a complete slam). However, having been an econ major in college, I have to say I'm a tad uncomfortable making that logical comparison between Jones' prediction and economists.
You know, I can respect the logic of those of you who think the case for a "non OBL-based" explanation of 9/11 is wrong, dangerous and you believe you are serving the cause of good to help combat harmful conspiracy theory.
If I believed what you believe, I imagine that I would be just as stident as you are.
If you are indeed correct in your conclusions, I think you do your cause well to be polite as you pursue that cause. In addition, I just plain appreciate it.
And, Joan,
keep up the good work.
It's not a matter of bleiving one thing or another BG. We KNOW OBL did it. He confessed, and numerous intel agencies linked him to it. Theres no reasonable basis for doubtig the fact that he was behind the 9/11 attacks. That's why YOUR beleifs are so aggrivating to me personaly, and it's why we'll never be able to change your mind; yours are beleifs based on faith rather than knowledge based on evidence.
It's not a matter of bleiving one thing or another
And that's what none of them understand. Belief connotes some kind of faith. We know Osama did this, it's a matter of fact.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Well, we'll start with your tagline first. The REAL quote is:
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
You can verify that Here
Unlike you, Franklin wasn't retarded. He understood that sometimes certain liberties can and must be sacrificed in order to achieve safety or security. So, please, stop misquoting the guy.
Secondly, that "non-writing hand" crap has been debunked countless time, both on this blog and elsewhere. If you had bothered to do some reading you would have avoided looking like a dumbass.
Also, you make it sound as if Osama took responsibility first and then denied it later. It was actually the other way around. Why it happened, nobody knows for sure, and I'm not going to make any guesses here. Why don't you phone the guy and ask?
"neah, always better to remain ignorant"
Well, you certainly are doing that. So far you've made an idiotic comment about an arab using his right hand for writing, you've shown your inability to use logic in your attempt to use denial followed by admission of guilt as some strange sort of evidence of innocence, and you've misquoted Benjamin Franklin in order to change the meaning of his words.
What do you do for an encore?
You FUCKING moron. Are you REALLY that stupid? I don't normally get this pissed off, but your idiocy know no bounds. Here's the FULL quote:
"Q: I want to be clear because I've heard you say this, and I've heard the President say it, but I want you to say it for my listeners, which is that the White House has never argued that Saddam was directly involved in September 11th, correct?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: That's correct. We had one report early on from another intelligence service that suggested that the lead hijacker, Mohamed Atta, had met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague, Czechoslovakia. And that reporting waxed and waned where the degree of confidence in it, and so forth, has been pretty well knocked down now at this stage, that that meeting ever took place. So we've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden [sic] was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming. But there -- that's a separate proposition from the question of whether or not there was some kind of a relationship between the Iraqi government, Iraqi intelligence services and the al Qaeda organization. "
The question was "is Sadam Hussein directly connected to 9/11. The VP attempts to answer that question, and MAKES A MISTAKE. You know that word "[sic]"? Yeah, that's to indicate a mistake made by the original speaker. If you read the rest of his paragraph, it's absolutely 100% clear that he's reffering to SADDAM HUSSEIN, and NOT Osama Bin Laden.
You SERIOUSLY need some sense knocked into you. With a 2x4 preferably.
Yah, that's enough from you there Dr. Freud. Next thing you'll be telling us is that nesnyc doesn't like riding horses because he's intimidated by the size of their penises. If you're unwilling or unable to reckonize a basic miswording, you're a waste of skin, and I have no time for you.
Post a Comment
<< Home