WTC 7 Video
As you can seen from about 25 seconds on, an enormous amount of smoke is pouring out of WTC 7.
posted by Pat @ 10:55 AM
16 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
As you can seen from about 25 seconds on, an enormous amount of smoke is pouring out of WTC 7.
Previous Posts
- Fighting Ghosts
- Gravy on WTC7
- False Brain News
- The Fall of the Towers: Did the Hobbits Do It?
- Idiotic Loose Change Forum Post O' the Day
- 9-11 Denial Hits Pop Culture
- 9-11 Denier Candidate In Action
- Ten-Second Rebuttal to the No-Planers
- Sign The Petition!
- Do-Over Dylan Announces Content of LCFC
View My Stats
Allies:
16 Comments:
What say you, truth cultists? There have to be some deniers lurking. Answer the evidence:
Video clearly showing WTC 7 suffered extraordinary damage from the fall of WTC 1&2. You can't even say the Government started the fires to make it look more realistic. The damage from WTC 1&2 debris is obvious, and unique to WTC 7.
Is it just a coincidence that the building the government planned to demolish anyway suffered the most severe damage of the buildings not hit by passenger jets? Did they somehow divine beforehand which bulding would get hit the hardest? Maybe all the buildings were rigged to collapse, just in case the government got the chance. Or is it possible that WTC 7 collapsed due to the extraordinary and unique damage it suffered - as every association of structural engineering agrees?
I'm just asking questions and demanding answers, truthiness-ers.
Oh that sucks for them....
Love how all the smoke is coming from the side where the WTC 5 & 6 were completely engulfed in flames too.
And funny hardly any smoke is coming out of the north face even though there are a couple "out of control" fires seen on that side.
Pull it!
You know, they will just come back with this fire or that fire that lasted for 8 weeks and still the building stood...lol
TAM
Pull it!
Which isn't a term used for explosive/implosive demolitions!
If there was a God I'd thank Him for granting me a good brain instead of the lemon you got stuck with.
It never fails to amaze me how they still remain so hopelessly desperate in their cause.
No kidding, the smoke is obviously coming from WTC7, but Killtown still can't let it go.
Oh come on! It's so OBVIOUS that the video was faked. I could do that in 5 minutes in Lightwave!
/CT_MODE
Killtown, you can see the wind is blowing south, which means that the smoke from the other two buildings should be (and is) no where near WTC7. That smoke is coming from WTC7 and no other building.
Yup....nooooo question about it.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ok ratman:
Please present evidence that states, that THE ONLY WAY to have ejected debris 30-40 storeys down in the south tower was EXPLOSIVES. This is what you said, so PROVE IT.
I want a statement from a top demolitions expert and/or structural engineer quoted as saying "Only explosives could cause the phenomenon we see 30-40 storeys down in the south tower".
I am willing to bet you cant find one. Maybe my aunt hilda tossed a chair at the window...maybe the air pressure blew it out, from the floors collapsing, maybe the heat from the fire contributed.
Like I said, show me proof, or your comment is merely speculation.
TAM
Amazingly enough, that squib materialized at the EXACT SAME INSTANT that I farted. I think my ass is somehow connected to the New World Order.
Guess most of you folks in here dont like the truth eh? Larry Silverstien has SAID he had the WTC7 building pulled that day. Demolition charges take WEEKS to plant. Get all your annoying asses over to Physics911.net and stop hiding from the truth! I know its not easy accepting the facts, but that does'nt mean you should go attempting to "debunk" Loose Change etc in a futile attempt to hide facts from people. LOADS of scientists etc have stated it has all the charictaristics of a controlled demolition and they have more knowledge than ANY of us!
Watch TERRORSTORM and more importantly, September 11th revisited. TOP SCIENTISTS SHOW THE TRUTH!!!
Have an open mind damn it, do your own research and find the truth not some blogger or screw loose change films that have no facts or make some up! Yes, MADE UP! Clearly that is the case with the Screw Loose Change film/book. "Pull it" IS A TERM USED BY DEMOLITION COMPANIES!!!! Many documentaries clear that matter up when jargon busting phrases. Truth will pervail in the end even with the debunking sites and papers that do more to debunk THEMSELVES than anything else!!!
By the way, I used to be like many here and think the "conspiracy theories" were rubbish. Until I looked around and saw the evidence for myself. Just thought I'd add that before my inevitable attack from you all dening the truth once again. Also plenty of online videos etc have been shown to be fake such as the obvious ones like the plane missing the towers. Its that easy to forge footage these days. TOO EASY!
What ?
How could a building when put on fire and debris thrown at it FALL SO SYMMETRICALLY.
It fell as if 'It had been in a demolition.If you watch clearly ,you'll find the roof first falls even though there were no fires at the roof.
It is better to say that they just demolished it.
Asymmetrical damage, as was seen in WTC 7, would not have caused a perfectly symmetrical collapse of this building into its own footprint...at nealy free-fall speed.
Post a Comment
<< Home