Rosie O'Donnell Endorses Loose Change
posted by Pat @ 1:45 PM
18 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Previous Posts
- Loose Change Assigned in Propaganda College Course
- Another Planter's Peanut
- CNN Got the Press Release Too!
- Troofer Math
- The News of My Death Has Been Greatly Exaggerated
- Anybody Know Which Countries Don't Have Extraditio...
- Shoah Shirker's Sales Soar
- The "Scholars" at the Conference
- BBC Producer: There Was No Sympathetic Piece on th...
- Meria Heller's Keynote Address to the Kooks
View My Stats
Allies:
18 Comments:
You guys ever wonder why every day there's more and more people repping 9/11 Truth, yet there has yet to be a single documented case of a person changing their mind and supporting the official story? More importantly, do you ever expect this trend to change?
That cracks me up. Then again, this is the same woman who endorsed rabid homophobe John Conner.
She wears underwear with dick holes in 'em.
You guys ever wonder why every day there's more and more people repping 9/11 Truth, yet there has yet to be a single documented case of a person changing their mind and supporting the official story? More importantly, do you ever expect this trend to change?
I did. I changed.
You guys ever wonder why every day there's more and more people repping 9/11 Truth, yet there has yet to be a single documented case of a person changing their mind and supporting the official story?
As Dylan said, your beliefs are not falsifiable. Once you people start believing in something, there is no logical way to convice you otherwise.
I was going to say, yes, I was curious about the issues truthers raised about 9/11 once. As I investigated further, though, I found the explanations offered here more convincing than the ones offered by the truthers. Simple as that.
As for the idea that the Twoof movement is on an upwards trend, don't know where you got that from. This time last year, maybe, it could have seemed like this would be the truthers' time. Now their movement is characterised by infighting, increasingly ludicrous statements, falling for transparent hoaxes, Holocaust denial, ridiculous paranoia towards anyone who disagrees with them, David Icke, etc. Hardly the sort of thing to win over the noncommittal.
Look. I'm a left-wing working-class pacifist bisexual atheist from England. I therefore have no reason whatsoever to think highly of George W Bush, the current Republican party or any of its staunch supporters. Yet I still think 9/11 conspiracies are utter pap. That has to tell you something about the flimsiness of your ideas, surely?
They'll just accuse you of lying about who you are. Eventually someone will say you're just a CIA shill. You can't argue with people who are willing to believe in any insane theory, as long as it supports their original beliefs.
What language is the page written in? I don't have a gibberish to English dictionary handy.
You guys ever wonder why every day there's more and more people repping 9/11 Truth, yet there has yet to be a single documented case of a person changing their mind and supporting the official story? More importantly, do you ever expect this trend to change?
I've personally "converted" seven people.
The numbers don't actually matter as it's argumentum ad populum - truth isn't democratic.
I converted a guy just by debunking the original pentagon strike flash animation.
I just had a scary thought:
If Rosie has gone Loosey, does that put us on Donald Trumps side?
I knew Rosie would eventually endorse LC. She is the sort of individual so caught up in political hatred that she will buy into anything that paints here "enemies" in a bad light and makes her feel better about herself. This is the #1 reason IMO why people believe this shit. People hate Bush so much that when a video comes along that says he was part of a conspiracy they jump on it because they want more reasons to hate someone.
I don't know which is worse: that O'Donnell endorses LC or that O'Donnell can't use the shift key.
Luke wrote: ". . .yet there has yet to be a single documented case of a person changing their mind and supporting the official story?"
That's because you haven't looked. Go talk to Oliver, JAStewart, and Lucas over on the JREF forum.
I know of two who with my help are now ignoring all the truthers crap. and several more who now have serious doubts about the movement when I have pointed out the lies 911 truth promotes.
The most common response I get when pointing out some real facts to someone leaning towards the silly side is "Oh... I didn't know that"
I just had a scary thought:
If Rosie has gone Loosey, does that put us on Donald Trumps side?
Having given it some more thought, I've concluded Donald Trumps side is alot better than Rosies.
Just another reason to dislike that douchebag rosie
Can I ask you to do 1 thing for me at this website. Please check out the Truth & Lies about 9/11 which is basically a lecture given by a Mr. Mike Ruppert. Please DISCREDIT ANY of his documents. I hve not yet been able to do so. He offers a financial reward should you prove him wrong.
Post a Comment
<< Home