Griffin Tries to Have It Both Ways

In this interview from last September:

You suggested that the FBI had repeated warnings from multiple sources that there was going to be an attack on the World Trade Center, which they systematically ignored.

That was part of it. Some of them were that explicit. Others were simply where they were investigating Osama Bin Laden, or members of Al Qaeda, people who were taking flying lessons and so on, various kinds of investigations where FBI members trying to do their jobs got stopped by FBI headquarters. And then after 9/11 the stories about not really going after Bin Laden.

Sigh. Warnings of what, David? The FBI was getting warnings from around the world that the US government was about to pull off a false-flag attack on itself? How in the world do you incorporate these warnings into your MIHOP scenarios?

Answer: Of course, you can't incorporate them into any sensible theory; it's just the usual "Isn't this suspicious?" nonsense from Griffin that he hopes nobody will realize is completely inconsistent with the rest of his "theory".

He repeats the Mark Bingham nonsense:

They do not have conversations where the people would really know I was talking to my son or my husband or my wife. And we have very good evidence that that’s not the case in the famous case of Mark Bingham, who says, “Hi Mom, this is Mark Bingham.” What person has ever talked to his mother and used his last name? That’s so absurd!

And what's more absurd is some idiot theologian who believes that the all-knowing and all-powerful government wrote up that script and somehow didn't notice that they had a young man using his last name with his mother.