I Guess They Have Peaked...

A few days ago I was speculating that Richard Gage and his argument from authority organization Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth was peaking. In one sense at least, I may have been right. On their front page they have a counter for the numbers of "architects and engineers" who have signed their petition, with the goal of 1,000 by September 11th. Previously it was stuck at 403, now it is... down to 401. Going the wrong way there Rich.

On a related note, their bogus and unscientific lists on the front page regarding the features of controlled demolition have always bugged me, and I have posted on it before. But anyone notice the list regarding WTC7:

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

Now for the moment I will ignore the first 3 items, all false of course, but look at #4.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.

That's doesn't even fit the category of the list! What kind of genius engineers are incapable of making a list consisting of 4 items properly?