Friday, June 02, 2006

Terrific Blog Post on Loose Change

Found this one in our referring logs and liked what Brian had to say.

It's to the point where the "smart" young turks of the urban centers have taught themselves to throw logic and reason out the window, much obeisance though they might make to such words when it comes to mocking religious people, when the subject is politics in general and 9/11 in particular. It's not about coming up with a theory and testing it with evidence. It's about ferreting out little inconsistencies and weirdnesses and dissenting opinions on observed phenomena, obsessing over isolated contextless details as a smokescreen against having to consider what if any significance those details have as part of any cohesive alternative theory of what happened, throwing them all together into a big mishmash with a "Gee, look at all the stuff that don't add up", and then elbowing each other in the ribs and arching their eyebrows and saying that all this obviously means that it was all a huge fraud.

Excellent post, read it all.


At 02 June, 2006 17:55, Blogger shawn said...

I blame it on deconstructionism, a fascinating and wholly ridiculous philosophy.

At 02 June, 2006 20:50, Blogger Chad said...

Looks like you forgot to bring your laugh track along with you tonight Rog.

Better luck next open mic night.

At 03 June, 2006 09:55, Blogger shawn said...

(such as the inexplicable and methodical collapse of Building 7

That's been totally debunked. Keep parroting that nonsense, though.

Rumsfeld's "slip-up" about a "missile" hitting the Pentagon was an intentional part of the Flight 77 red herring (Flight 77 did hit the Pentagon, but they are intentionally perpetuating the red herring to throw people off, make us argue, and discredit us, and I think the whole hoax probably originated from Rumsfeld and others as a deliberate tactic.

No, a missle is a moving projectile. An arrow is a missle. A plane used to crash into something is a missle. It's not odd at all that he'd refer to it as a "missle".

Larry A. Silverstein is a close friend of Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak

Oh god, it's the Jews again!

The jets that responded would have made it in time if they had flown at full speed. Why didn’t they fly at full speed?

They weren't even scrambled till 93 went down.

Flight 77 hit the one and only section of the Pentagon that had been renovated to withstand just such an attack

And you know what that's called? Say it with me class: "coincidence". You're using a logical fallacy called correlation implies causation.

The NIST Report completely ignores building 7, saying it will be considered “at a later date.” The Bush-appointed, 10-member corruption-squad known as the 9-11 Commission also ignored building 7 - most Americans don't even know about building 7, because the media have ignored it.

Corruption-squad? Boy, you're way over the deep end. Seriously seek help.

Wanna know why they don't talk about 7? It had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ATTACKS. You idiots bringing it up again and again continually fall on the red herring fallacy. There is no reason to destroy WTC7, and there's no evidence that happened.

At 03 June, 2006 09:55, Blogger shawn said...

Looks like you forgot to bring your laugh track along with you tonight Rog.


At 03 June, 2006 15:29, Blogger shawn said...

if the collapse of building 7 has been "debunked," why don't you explain how or cite a source?

I guess you didn't follow my link to what a controlled demolition looks like. Not only does WTC7 look nothing like that, but it had been on fire for hours, and had massive structural damage. That you Einsteins can't put fire + massive structural damage = collapse is hilarious.

and if you don't think it's odd that he referred to a 757 as a missile, I think you're stretching your imagination.

Actually, you're stretching. The plane was a missile in that instance.

mis·sile P Pronunciation Key (msl, -l)
An object or weapon that is fired, thrown, dropped, or otherwise projected at a target; a projectile.

Why is that so odd to mention? Oh right, because you idiots don't realize words have more than one meaning and that not everything is literal. It's why you can't understand similes.

you cannot ignore the connection with the Mossad agents and Silversteing based on the fact that they are Jewish, which is what you're trying to do.

You don't seem to understand how this is a red herring. He's friends with what? That doesn't bring any evidence to 7 being demolished.

: it was housing files related to ongoing SEC investigations, as well as elements of the CIA and Secret Service.

And the money in the insider trading was a joke compared to staging a terrorist attack to hide it.

"In Plane Site," which was a deliberate disinformation video

You're in serious denial.

seek help? idiot? you people continously resort to insults, like schoolchildren.

When you folks continually ignore critical thinking and evidence, I'll call you what you are. Either insane or idiots.


Post a Comment

<< Home