Thursday, November 16, 2006

More Amusement at the Loose Change Forums

A relatively new member at the forums asks what people say about Screw Loose Change (the movie). Well, as everybody knows that SLC points out quite a few errors in Loose Change, the veterans over have more or less arrived at a formula response.

Terrorcell: They debunked what can be debunked. They won't dare attempt to do that to films like 9/11 The Road To Tyranny and Martial Law : 9/11 and the Police State along with the ones that you mentioned.

But of course, that causes some confusion among the newbies. Sarah2006 asks:

Hello i am new here. I saw loose change and because i don´t know much about the facts could you explain which facts are wrong? Somebody in here said there are some errors but which ones?

Well, you know they're not going to want to answer that one.

PDoh: There are some errors but I wouldnt just focus on loose change. Go to google video and watch "911 mysteries" and "911: press for truth".

But Sarah comes back with:

I have heard about these movies and i will watch them but i nevertheless want to know about the errors in loose change. You brought them up so what are they?

Roxdog: Ever heard of a search engine?

PDoh: Do some research yourself. Any errors in loose change are irrelevant.

Do you agree withthe film?

Not satisfactory at all to Sarah:

How should i agree with a film if you in here say there are errors????
You´re kidding, don´t you????

So the film is not true at all or what errors are we talking about? Shall i spend a week for finding what errors they are if you guys know them???? Hello?????

Well, of course you can guess the next part, right?

PDoh: Go back to jref. Ive seen windows less transparent than you.

Victoria chirps up:

Screw SLC ...the fact is that we want to know THE TRUTH.I don't blame Dylan for making errors because the fact is 911 is suspicious!

You want to know the truth, but you don't blame people for not telling it to you?


At 16 November, 2006 09:11, Blogger Alex said...

It's the X-Files version of the search for truth. The best way to find it is to stumble around like Helen Keller in a forest, putting together dribs and drabs of information randomly, and then relying mostly on shadowy figures (who may or may not be imaginary) to piece it all together for you.

I think Fox Moulder f****d up an entire generation of teens.

At 16 November, 2006 09:11, Blogger Jujigatami said...

You want the truth?


(I can't believe I was the first one to post that!)

At 16 November, 2006 10:03, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

I have gone on some forums where the 9/11 Troothers reside in their dank caves, and posted as some fellow nutbar who "just wants to ask some questions" to clear things up. I acted naive, and invited people to help me understand the 9/11 Fruitpie Movement.

You should see the venom, the invective, the pure and bitter hatred directed at me just for asking the wrong question - you would think I was a government agent or something. Every concievable lunatic on these forums first called me every name that they could, and then some demanded I just be thrown off, which I was. No dissent, no questions - just banishment.

You can always tell a liberal: they are the ones whose books are on fire.

At 16 November, 2006 10:31, Blogger pomeroo said...

A hugely important addition to

At 16 November, 2006 11:20, Blogger tym said...

Maybe we need to make a "Fuck 9/11 Mysteries" blog/guide/movie?

And "9/11 Press for truth can goto hell"

At 16 November, 2006 11:23, Blogger Jujigatami said...

Know what the real 9/11 mystery is?

How can their be so many retards in the world?

At 16 November, 2006 12:01, Blogger James B. said...

How ironic is it that even on the Loose Change board, they refuse to defend the movie, they just tell you to watch other movies.

At 16 November, 2006 12:02, Blogger Alex said...

Naw, you can't be that obvious or vulgar about it Tym. Screw Loose Change is a clever play on words. You'd have to do something similar for the other two. Like "9/11 Myster Lies" and "9/11 Dress for Twoof".

(yeah, I know, those two suck, but you get the idea)

At 16 November, 2006 12:17, Blogger James B. said...

The Loosers never seem to get the pun. The original name of the blog was actually the rather cumbersome "Loose Change, Loose Screws", but Pat came up with a better alternative.

At 16 November, 2006 12:49, Blogger Pat said...

Maybe 9-11 Press My Pants? Or 9-11 Pull My Finger?

At 16 November, 2006 12:50, Blogger Pat said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

At 16 November, 2006 12:53, Blogger Alex said...

Heh. No Pat, it seems the stroke of genius which created the title of this blog was a one-shot deal ;)

At 16 November, 2006 13:43, Blogger CHF said...


Twoofers admit there are things wrong with LC but don't want to say which parts.


Cuz it would undermine the rest of their theories.

Say the twoofers admit the hijackers-still-alive story is wrong.

Then the hijackers are dead. So how did they die?

And so on....

At 16 November, 2006 17:04, Blogger Rayzor said...

I wish President Bush would use the twoofers approach to answer questions.

Journalist: Mr. President, you say there are WMDs in Iraq, but have not found any recently. Can you tell us where they are or where you believe they went?

President Bush: Search it on Google.

Journalist: But Mr. President, if you know the answer already, you should just tell us.

President Bush: You're obviously an axis of evil spy. Condi, sick'em girl!

At 16 November, 2006 22:32, Blogger Zeitgeist said...

LOL @ rayzor!

At 16 November, 2006 22:57, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

If you can't see that Dylan suggesting a missile hit the pentagon is a hypothesis on his part, rather than a statemtn of fact, they you are an idiot and you don't need to wake up in the morning...


This guy is just asking questions and now BOOM he is told he should be dead for asking questions!


At 27 September, 2008 17:43, Blogger Dave said...

For God sake people, open your eyes. 9/11 was an inside job. There are too many facts that tell what really happened. Bush, Saudies etc... on the day of judgement..............


Post a Comment

<< Home