Lefty Blogger Sees Through Loose Change
Not everybody is fooled.
Do yourself a favor. Just watch even 15 minutes of the above-linked video, and pay attention to all the ways in which it manipulates you to take it seriously. The way it establishes itself as ethical right off the bat by dedicating itself to those that died in 9/11. The way it incorporates live footage. The "voice of God" narration. The endless stream of facts that sound like something he knows but you don't know. The witnesses you know nothing about (keeping in mind that Michael Moore is now being sued by somebody featured in Fahrenheit whose interview was edited to make it project something other than what the guy believed. And that this particular filmmaker is also being sued by French filmmakers whose footage he copped without permission... not a responsible way to go about making a documentary.)
Think about this stuff. Think about how the media at every step preys on your ignorance and insecurities to win you over. Television. The drug of the nation. Step back and look at what commercials are actually saying. Watch what commercials play when. They're watching you. Car and beer commercials during Monday Night Football. Clearasil during the Gilmore Girls. Product placements. Wonder why your five o'clock news reports what it does, and pay attention to the order of the stories it plays. (American Idol news was recently the lead on Good Morning America. We're in a war. Tell you anything?) Don't ever read/watch from a single source. Wonder about every documentary's angle. (And that includes segments on 20/20 and Frontline and all that shit you might take for news.)
EVERYBODY has an angle. Everybody. Your girlfriend, your boyfriend, channel 4, the BBC, Michael Moore. Everybody wants something out of you. Sometimes, it's a good thing. But a lot of the time, you fall for crap that compromises you.
Don't.
She's obviously a critical thinker, and aware of the power of images to deceive.
posted by Pat @ 7:53 AM
28 comments
28 Comments:
She's obviously a Rove plant, via Cheney, Wolfowitz and Pearle - paid for by Halliburton, Brown & Root and Diebold.
:-)
But, I mean, its like my career and stuff, you know, I mean, it was going great when everybody loved me. Now, teh Man is after me man, like this wouldn't be happening if we weren't close to something. Let me ask my man Jason a question . . .
She makes a lot of good point although from a hysterically emotional point of view. Take away the hysterics and what are we left with? Okay, that was VERY easy.
I couldn't resist.. i linked her to the SLC video. no reply yet, though.
This notion that Dylan Avery is "manipulating" anyone is dumb. You are under no compulsion to watch the movie.
What the hell sort of logic is that? Manipulators almost never have any actual control over their victims. Most of the time the only power they have is that which the victim himself gives them.
Most of the time the only power they have is that which the victim himself gives them.
This blog is living proof of this statement. I mean, look how Dylan has you obsessively deconstructing his every word. And look how the mainstream media has you repeating lies and supporting the PTB's war of conquest and genocide. Hitler would be proud of a loyal following like you guys. LOL!
I mean, look how Dylan has you obsessively deconstructing his every word.
Can someone say "pull it"?
I love how any six-degrees-of-separation type connection between two people is clearly evidence, but an angry reaction to that manipulation, yes manipulation, of facts is "an obsession".
Can someone say "pull it"?
That's a fairly simple term and Dylan and crew only highlighted it without really going into Silversteins Zionist connections. Unlike the boys here at SLC and the folks that are merrily seeking every opportunity (because they are truly frightened) sling mud, I say the LC crew either exercised extreme restraint at exposing Silverstein or don't yet know the complete picture. Let’s stick to the fact please.
I clicked on your link and it just went to a google page listing links that began with a webpage called like jewwatch.com and others such as rumormillnews.com.
Do you seriously expect me to take a website called "jewwatch" seriously?
There has been very little "restraint" on the part of CT'ers regarding the "pull it" comment.
And I can guarentee that I am not frightened. I am thoroughly disgusted.
Jewwatch for crying in the beer.
I think Jerry Seinfeld is behind it too...
Do not mock Lord Seinfeld.
Abby, You'll soon realize that nesnyc is absolutely and totally fucking nutso, 100% wicky in the wacky woo.
Once you realize that, he's actually quite entertaining, in a sad sort of way.
The disgusting part is that there are actually several people (though probably not more than 100 or so) that not only think like him, but are just high functioning enough (when on their meds) to use a computer.
My God, it's cartoonish.
Jewwatch.
I just imagined a huge machine a la Cerebro from X-men, and millions of jews showing up as red dots of light.
This notion that Dylan Avery is "manipulating" anyone is dumb.
He's preying on your ignorance of basic physics/history/rules of logic/etc.
You are under no compulsion to watch the movie.
Nor are you under an compulsion to watch Michael Moore's claptrap.
because they are truly frightened
We're not the ones who live in some fantasy world where the Jews ("Zionists" in your newspeak) run everything.
I just imagined a huge machine a la Cerebro from X-men, and millions of jews showing up as red dots of light.
I just got milk all over my keyboard.
Hah, that Jew Watch site is quite amusing. "This is not a hate site", but the first headline is "KILLER JEWS STRIKE AGAIN IN GAZA STRIP".
Also love the photo comparison of Joe Stalin and Dustin Hoffman; compelling evidence indeed.
Also love the photo comparison of Joe Stalin and Dustin Hoffman; compelling evidence indeed.
Yeah, because we all know what a big Jew Stalin was.
(Studied to be a priest, for those not in the know.)
Nessie, "Pull it" has become the rallying cry of the truth movement. I see it dropped all the time in comments in their forums, I see it in their signatures.
They see WTC7 and what happened there as their Holy Grail of Truth.
And please explain to me why Evil Zionist Silverstien would "pull" building 7... just to rebuild it again?
I thought teh Joos! were supposed to be money grubbing freaks. Why get the insurance payoff from WTC7 and spend it on another WTC7?
(Studied to be a priest, for those not in the know.)
Ever heard of Adam Weishaupt? Obviously not.
And please explain to me why Evil Zionist Silverstien would "pull" building 7... just to rebuild it again?
Everybody knows Gooliani had his trade tower demolishing control center at building 7. It had to come down to destroy that evidence. Silverstein was only doing his job. Why does that even need any explanation? It's quite clear how and why this went down.
Hah, that Jew Watch site is quite amusing. "This is not a hate site", but the first headline is "KILLER JEWS STRIKE AGAIN IN GAZA STRIP".
That's a very factual comment. Look here how this is normal operating procedure of the Talmudist Khazars.
Love it.
The phrase could be "Deadly Kikes blow some shit up while wearing stupid hats!" and he would still defend it.
That's a very factual comment.
The Palestinians started it (although back then they called themselves Egyptians, Syrians, and Jordanians) and continue the bloodshed. It isn't a factual comment in any sense of the word "factual".
Everybody knows Gooliani had his trade tower demolishing control center at building 7.
'Everybody', eh? Must be one of those lesser definitions of 'everybody' that means: "Complete whackjob anti-semitic nutjob conspiracy cranks"
thoery goes something like "the offices of the CIA, FBI, FEMA, SEC, and the NYC command center were located there, so they CD the building to distory the evidence."
Everybody knows Gooliani had his trade tower demolishing control center at building 7. It had to come down to destroy that evidence.
Dude, you people... Honest to Joos. Look, in order to justify imploding AN ENTIRE BUILDING for the sole purpose of "destroying evidence", there'd have to be crap-tacular shit load of evidence that needed destroyed. So how is it that these people forgot about your pesky Northwoods document. Or the PNAC report.
Who got to be the guy that told Cheney, "Ummm yeah.... I, uhh. I think we forgot to put a few things in WTC7 before we 'pulled it'.".
I mean really. Demolish an entire building?? Haven't you jackasses ever heard of a paper shreader?
What CHF?
I'm sorry, I was too busy uplinking to the Pentagon and the White House so I could get tomorrow's talking points.
Need to keep the gubmint checks comin' in.
Hey, can we finish this conversation later? There's a Joo at the door. And we all know what happens when you keep those guys waiting....
So how is it that these people forgot about your pesky Northwoods document. Or the PNAC report.
Forgot? Those are their blue prints for what commenced! Part of the "conditioning" process especially PNAC. Those high level sheep that read those policy papers have that Neocon finger pointing at them and saying "I told you so, now support our war."
But who really cares about these papers? We all know Americans don't read and a great many, like you guys, don't think or even care about stuffy geopolitical policies and strategies. It's way over your heads. For the criminals, there's safety in the public's stupidity. You guys are living proof.
If you read PNAC, it certainly is a "strategic blueprint". However, it's a blueprint for future progress based on the idea that there WON'T be an event like 9/11. As soon as those airplanes hit the towers, PNAC became obolete. You might actually want to READ it some time, insync. It talks about doing pretty much the exac opposite of how the US operates today.
But who really cares about these papers?
Not you.
You obviously didn't read (or understand the background of) other of them.
either*
Post a Comment
<< Home