Markyx Strikes Again!
Terrific video demonstrating the Loosers' callous attitude towards the passengers and pilots:
posted by Pat @ 10:14 AM
18 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Previous Posts
- On Billiard Balls and Keebler Elves
- Juveniles
- Holocaust Deniers and 9-11 Truth
- Fetzer, Fetzer, Fetzer
- Kevin Barrett: Scholar for 9/11 "Truth" (snicker)
- Vanity Fair Article Now Online
- Stone's World Trade Center Getting Bigtime Kudos
- Ellsburg: I Am Not a Nut
- Bermas Interviews a Firefighter
- Now We Know Why He Isn't a Military Expert
View My Stats
Allies:
18 Comments:
Very well done. I hope you emailed a link to Mother Avery.
"Oh please Mr. Hijacker, keep those boxcutters away from us 44-90 people!"
LoL! I can't believe you OCTs still by the boxcutter and small plastic knives theory!
Btw, boxcutters were only reported on Flt 77 buy Babs Olson's husband and BushCo member, Ted "the gov't lies" Olson as far as I know.
Oh and Pat, still waiting for your conclusions about my Val McClatchey photo analysis.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Oh and Pat, still waiting for your conclusions about my Val McClatchey photo analysis.
And I'm still waiting for you to decide which specific member of the New York City Fire Department you'd like to libel next, since your first choice was murdered by terrorists before he could accomplish the task you assigned to him. Any progress on that? Or at least an apology to Chief Ganci?
That's what happened huh, because the powers-at-be told you? Sheep.
As soon as one passenger was hurt/killed by a boxcutter weilding person, you'd have 43-89 people bum-rushing them and on top of them.
Why didn't all those seasoned military men on Flt 77 do anything? Were they all "scared" by those menacing boxcutters on board? LoL!
Suggestion:
first image in the video should be, telling the audience who is about to talk, what he is famous for (video Loose Change) and what he believes.
It will have a greater impact on the audience, when they then listen to his juvenile crassness.
Killtown;
I have worked in the ER, and I have treated wounds made with boxcutters, and let me tell you, they can not only give you a long wound, but also a very deep wound.
Beyond that, the hijackers threatened they had bombs.
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF CTs BELITTLING SUCH A HORRIBLE TRAGEDY BASED ON THEIR 20/20 HINESIGHT OF THE SITUATION.
"Thats rediculous...I would have hit him with my luggage, I would have ran at them and taken them in minutes...blah, blah, blah....what a bunch of heated S@#t!!
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE DONE IF 5 GD ARABS STOOD UP WITH ELONGATED WEAPONS IN THEIR HANDS, THREATENED TO BLOW UP THE PLANE WITH A BOMB, AND THEN CUT SOME OF THE ATTENDANTS WITH THOSE BLADES.
Something tells me, after you S*&t and pissed in your pants, you would probably have shut up and been a good little boy.
damn i am mad!!!
here is the Fetzer top 10 link for you MarkyX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fbP1lvmBY8
LoL! I can't believe you OCTs still by the boxcutter and small plastic knives theory!
Btw, boxcutters were only reported on Flt 77 buy Babs Olson's husband and BushCo member, Ted "the gov't lies" Olson as far as I know.
Uh they also said they had bombs? S-s-s-trawman for the win.
Even if we pretend they didn't claim to have bombs - why would they resist? Since you (and seemingly every conspiracy loon) are so ignorant when it comes to history, and specifically the history of terrorism, I'll let you in on a secret - when people hijacked planes, they had their demands met and let people go. They didn't FLY FULLY FUELED AIRLINERS INTO SKYSCRAPERS.
By the way, how do you defend against a boxcutter (hell, even a plastic knife) nailing you from behind without knowing its coming? I could kill you with a Mach 3 from behind if I wanted to.
That's what happened huh, because the powers-at-be told you? Sheep
Oh no, we must be sheep! We don't listen to Killtown! (Damn, you people wouldn't understand irony if it came up and bit you on the behind.)
As soon as one passenger was hurt/killed by a boxcutter weilding person, you'd have 43-89 people bum-rushing them and on top of them.
Yeah, since there's been packed planes that didn't do that...Killtown, there's this thing called "history" and in this "history" things called "events" happen. Now we, as thinking individuals, take these "events" and judge present and/or future "events" on how the rest of this "history" followed.
I already explained how history ain't on your side, buddy.
The "plastic" knives were not the kind you use at a picnic; they're the ones advertised on TV, where the pitchman cuts a soda can in half, then uses it to slice a tomato. Because they were not made of metal, they will not show up on a metal detector.
KT, I left a comment on that post just now.
ummm, I am guessing the latter, but what the $%*^ does that have to do with what we are talking about.
$3.98 boxcutter vs multi-trillion dollars defense system...who wins?
Because the defense system was specifically designed to stop people hijacking planes and crashing them all over?
Oh right, that never happened before.
You should pick up a Bible sometime. There's this story about a Philistine (big ol' brute) named Goliath who gets killed by a little boy named David.
Like hey man this comment?
$3.98 boxcutter vs multi-trillion dollars defense system...who wins?
Makes more sense when applied to:
$3.98 boxcutter vs. throat
I mean, that's what they were used on.
But as far as I understand it, the hijackers went up against civil aviation and crews that was trained to offer no resistance.
Oh, come on, now you're losing logic. That's not fair, they don't stand a chance.
911coverup...
I am bored, your comments are boring, because those issues have been delt with on all the sites (SLC, SLC Forum, JREF Forum) zillions of times. They carry no weight here, as they have been explained and or debunked...so yes I am getting yet, I got it long ago, its crap...
"Interesting. That time line makes absolutely no sense..."
Loose Change version 8 does make sense, though. After the next revision, we'll finally have the FINAL version of the "truth."
Why all the revisions? Shouldn't the original piece stand up to actual scrutiny?
I'll answer it - because the movie and the "theories" that propel the 9-11 Denial community are symptomatic of a larger infection that has taken over the left in this country. They know it, and we know it.
In addition, if you are going to make outlandish assertions involving secret covert military strikes on US citizens with $$$ going out all over to Jews and government officials, missles, controlled demolitions, etc. while completely dismissing the testimony of scientists, physicists, government officials, firemen, police officers, intel agents, rescue workers, actual vicims and family members of the attacks, then the burden is on the denial community to present that overwhelming evidence that they so often refer to but we never seem to see.
The burden is not on us to "disprove" the 9-11 deniers. There is more than enough evidence (as this blog and other sites and publications like Popular Science have demonstrated) to counter and dispell their ignorant rantings.
This is America - if you are going to make a charge, the burden of proof is on YOU. These CT are like defense attorneys trying to act like prosecutors - trying to build a case while simultaneously destroying their case (or ignoring those facts which destroy their case - namely, all of them).
Maybe they're saving the "big guns" for "Loose Change re-edited version 67: Now with MORE truthiness!"
Post a Comment
<< Home