WTC 7--Is This The Holy Grail?
This picture was posted on Democratic Underground in the past two weeks. It's a stunning photo, possibly the missing piece in the WTC 7 puzzle.
As yet it's unverified but it fits with much that we've already seen.
Compare it to this picture, shot over the Winter Garden:
Both pictures show modest damage to the top several stories of the building at the southwest corner. Note particularly the break in the parapet wall just to the right of the corner in both pictures.
The vidcap needs to be confirmed; it definitely looks like it's from a San Francisco-Bay Area station. But if that can be accomplished?
Case Closed.
posted by Pat @ 12:41 AM
28 comments
28 Comments:
I think the winter garden picture is the clearer of the two, but it would be nice to see the whole video of the first one. It is two clouded at that moment to call it the holy grail, IMHO.
I like this one also, but not sure if it is confirmed.
http://www.kolumbus.fi/av.caesar/wtc/wtc7_2.jpg
It's always been obvious why there aren't a ton of pictures of that face of the building following the collapse of the towers -- it would be a very difficult shot to get and wouldn't have seemed very interesting in the context of everything else which had happened that day. But it always seemded a little weird that there were no pictures of the south face. So yeah, if this turns out to be a legit pic it is very interesting.
Yes, "fire" brought down this building on its footprint. Keep repeating that.
And keep repeating that Uncle Larry recommended for the Captain to pull it out his men.
lol
Can someone please show me a photo of this "bulge"?
Also, can someone please show me one helicopter video of the 7 collapses since the buzz was everybody knew it was "coming down"?
Killtown, please explain why the fire department, who lost over 300 people on 9/11, wired the building for explosives. Also which division of the fire department is qualified to carry out demolitions of this size?
Also explain why the decision to "pull it" was based on the fact that there was a severe loss of life. If there wasn't a loss of life would the fire department then have left the building standing?
While you are at it, could you also explain how these demolitions managed to survive a 7 hour fire.
I am really curious.
Yes, "fire" brought down this building on its footprint. Keep repeating that.
Yes, Killtown there was "no smoke" pouring out of virtually "every floor" indicating that "a lot" of the floors were "on fire".
Hey, but having a whole corner scooped out wouldn't hinder it from collapsing, right?
Oh, and when buildings fall on their footprint they damage adjacent buildings, too...oh wait.
Sometimes I wish the CTers would just stop "Pulling" the same tiresome rabbits out of their top hats.
How many times do the same old "nuggets" have to be debunked.
Do they ever stop and think how ridiculous these theories sound. I can imagine the conversation.
Silvestein: Hey Chief, I know you are busy, can I have a word with your for a second?
Fire Chief: Yeah, sure Larry what's up.
Silverstein: Hey sorry about losing your entire station house in the collapse. Marvin Bush and I are behind the whole thing actually, but I have a favor to ask you.
Fire Chief: Yeah, sure, what do you need?
Silverstein: Well, you see, the plan is to blow up 3 buildings, not just 2, and I was wondering if you could help me blow up WTC7.
Fire Chief: Why do you want to blow up WTC7?
Silverstein: Well, I wanted to build another building there, and the CIA and SEC have offices there and... It's really complicated. Can you do it or not?
Fire Chief: Sure, no problem.
Silverstein: OK, well here is the the computer that controls the whole thing, but don't do anything until you ask me first.
Fire Chief: Just a couple of restrictions though. I will only blow it up if the fire gets out of control and it looks like we can't fight it, and only if you decide there has been a severe loss of life first.
Silverstein: OK, makes sense. Agreed.
Link?
1) Nice side-step of my questions.
2) Who said the ENTIRE fire dept was in on it??? Did you ever stop to think that Fire Captain (if it really was one) was part of the "in on it team"? It's not rocket science you know.
CDI: "pull it" means "pull down".
3) No collapse footage from the helicopers??? Hmmm.
You didn't ask a question. You avoided answering my questions even though I addressed them specifically to you.
Did you ever stop to think that Fire Captain (if it really was one) was part of the "in on it team"? It's not rocket science you know.
Yeah, those firemen who run into buildings everyday have no problem being involved in the murder of their people. And if it wasn't a fire captain, then why would Silverstein lie about it? He went to all the trouble to lie and make up that part of the story, but wasn't smart enough to omit the fact that he blew up the building!!! Yeah, that makes sense.
CDI: "pull it" means "pull down".
Hey, Einstein, when they "pull" a building they literally pull it. They attach cables to it and pull it away from adjacent buildings.
Do you folks understand context. HE WASN'T TALKING TO A FUCKING DEMOLITION EXPERT. He was talking to a firefighter. To a firefighter "pull" means evacuate.
And you wonder why I make fun of you.
It cracks me up how whenever you watch a CTer talk about building demolition now, they always use the term "pull", like this is part of their regular everyday vocabulary or something.
Right, so the "Fire Captain" placed all 40,000 charges personaly, and then waited untill Sillverstein told him to "pull it". Or, wait, maybe he paid the janitors to plant some charges. It's not like explosives take any skill or effort to place. A fireman and a bunch of mexican illegals could have wired the whole building in an hour, tops!
Guys, KKKilltown will never believe that WTC7 wasn't deliberatly demolished for the simple fact that a rich jew was involved.
That's all the evidence he will ever need for his own satisfaction that he's right.
So until one of us comes up with a time machine that will allow us to go back abd block the sale so that some other ethno-religious group can own the building, KKKilltown will always be a waste of time and especially oxygen.
One more time OCTs, NO ONE IS SAYING THE ENTIRE FIRE DEPT WAS IN ON IT OR PLANTED THE BOMBS!!!
Is that clear enough?
Most likely scenario is that Fire Chief was one of the few from the fire dept who was in on it.
Wouldn't it be logical that if they were going to pull the building that they'd get the final go-ahead from the owner?
You guys need to think outside the box a little. This stuff is not rocket science.
Speechless, why? why is that not logical?
Here we go again: "Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."
Case closed....
Most likely scenario is that Fire Chief was one of the few from the fire dept who was in on it.
Actually, terrorist scum, The Chief of Department was murdered by your confederates on September 11, 2001. Try again.
Speechless, why? why is that not logical?
Since you're not using the quote in context, that's why it's not logical.
Yes, firefighters use the word "pull." It's the PHRASE "pull it" that is in question.
"It" is singular, not plural. They were talking about the WTC 7 (singular) on that PBS doc.
You saying Uncle Larry said a poor choice of words? No one misspeaks that bad.
"It" refers to the firefighting effort. Pull it = pull the firefighting effort.
So wait, Uncle Larry could not have meant it in demolition terms, because he's not in the demolition business, but he knows supposed firefighting terms even though he is not in the firefighting business???
I love OCT logic!
"Pull the effort".
LOL!!!!
The guy he was talking to was a firefighter, dumbass.
So have you bothered to contact the Fire captain in question, Killtown, and accuse him of this. Maybe he'll confess...or maybe he'll sue you...or maybe he'll hunt you down.
So KKKilltown, which specific member of the New York City Fire Department would you care to slander next, your first choice having been killed by your confederates before he had the chance to complete the demolition of 7 WTC? I'd like to get as many people on possible so I can introduce you to their families if you ever show up in New York.
"It" is singular, not plural. They were talking about the WTC 7 (singular) on that PBS doc.
"Pull" evacuate, "it" the area.
Do you need everything spelled out for you, you child?
dont even try to act liek you have the slightest clue what logic is
why is it more logical that a business man speaking to a fire fighter would use CD terminology?
It's the same logic that allows "back and to the left" to make perfect sense to people.
Post a Comment
<< Home