As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Monday, August 07, 2006
Real Controlled Demolition
Listen to the loud bangs as this building in Fort Worth is brought down:
Anybody other than the producers of 9-11 Eyewitness recall bangs like those being heard at the WTC?
I never could understand how people could say "It looked like a CD!" It was nothing like a CD. There were no loud bangs and flashes rippling through the buildings and the collapse started from the top and not the bottom.
Damn that's loud. How far was the camera from the building? Something as big as the WTC would need lots of explosions and EVERYONE would've heard bangs, not just firemen.
It was a special controlled demo; the kind that only the guv can do, and the kind that only CTers can spot despite having no qualifications in the field.
Real P'Oed about Kill Clown and the gagng of fools harassing the woman who took the picture of Flight 93. Worried that one of these freaks, most are not wrapped too tight, trying to harm her for simply taking a picture. The fact that it does not fit into their lunatic scheme does not give them the right to harass her.
Not to mention the fact, that since they would not be able to weaken the structure beforehand, or drill into beams and emplace thousands of charges properly, they would have to had used an exponentially greater amount of explosives.
according to rick siegel a lot of people in manhattan reported similar explosions, but the reports were dismissed due to lack of video evidence
this doesnt make sense to me because:
1: why woudl multiple eyewitness accounts be dismissed just because it wasnt caught on tape?
2: there WAS video evidence, rick siegel had it, why not show the tape to investigators? (i suspect this has something to with him making 20 dollars a copy on the video now)
3: why have none of these people talked the loud explosions since then?
You know the 4,000 Jews who stayed home from work on 9/11? Turns out they were all in Joisey, setting up massive speakers which beamed out noise-cancelling waves that blocked the sound of the controlled-demolition charges detonating. It's the only logical explanation, when you think about it.
"According to rick siegel a lot of people in manhattan reported similar explosions, but the reports were dismissed due to lack of video evidence"
The guy filmed all of it, then why isn't on his tape? All you can hear on his tape are incidental loud booms, which could easily be attributed to fuelexplosions.
CT 'logic': A controlled demolition looks (and sounds) EXACTLY like the videos we see from WTC1, 2 and 7. Since this video does not look like any of the above it must be a fake. Debunked ;-)
22 Comments:
Well needless to say, that look snothing like the WTCs. It starts at the bottom, then all the building comes down.
You'd theink that someone at the bottowm of the WTCs would have noticed something like that.
[CT_mode]
OMGZORS Pyroclastic flow!! Free-fall!! Pulverized concrete!!
Its exactly like the WTC collapses.
[/CT_mode]
Actually someone said that on the United 93 board, believe it or not..
I never could understand how people could say "It looked like a CD!" It was nothing like a CD. There were no loud bangs and flashes rippling through the buildings and the collapse started from the top and not the bottom.
Conspiracy theorists blog that Flight 93 photo is fake - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (08/06/06)
McClatchey photo blogpost makes mainstream news
Damn that's loud. How far was the camera from the building? Something as big as the WTC would need lots of explosions and EVERYONE would've heard bangs, not just firemen.
Great find!
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Killtown is back, but is seems only to spam us with self promoting advertising...
Killtown is back, but is seems only to spam us with self promoting advertising...
of course, hes famous now, isnt that goal of all truthers?
Watch it again and notice not only the sound, but the shockwave when they are hanging over the edge of the parking garage. Its like an earthquake!
Nevermind, wrong video. I thought it was this video that Pat had posted(its of the same building, different vantage points)
Killtown is back but so am I.
BTW, I got a nod from the New York Times...
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Sept-11-Conspiracies.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
It was a special controlled demo; the kind that only the guv can do, and the kind that only CTers can spot despite having no qualifications in the field.
Real P'Oed about Kill Clown and
the gagng of fools harassing the
woman who took the picture of
Flight 93. Worried that one of
these freaks, most are not wrapped
too tight, trying to harm her for
simply taking a picture. The fact
that it does not fit into their
lunatic scheme does not give them
the right to harass her.
Not to mention the fact, that since they would not be able to weaken the structure beforehand, or drill into beams and emplace thousands of charges properly, they would have to had used an exponentially greater amount of explosives.
according to rick siegel a lot of people in manhattan reported similar explosions, but the reports were dismissed due to lack of video evidence
this doesnt make sense to me because:
1: why woudl multiple eyewitness accounts be dismissed just because it wasnt caught on tape?
2: there WAS video evidence, rick siegel had it, why not show the tape to investigators? (i suspect this has something to with him making 20 dollars a copy on the video now)
3: why have none of these people talked the loud explosions since then?
You know the 4,000 Jews who stayed home from work on 9/11? Turns out they were all in Joisey, setting up massive speakers which beamed out noise-cancelling waves that blocked the sound of the controlled-demolition charges detonating. It's the only logical explanation, when you think about it.
whatta ya xpect from dem Jooisey Joos..lol
"According to rick siegel a lot of people in manhattan reported similar explosions, but the reports were dismissed due to lack of video evidence"
The guy filmed all of it, then why isn't on his tape? All you can hear on his tape are incidental loud booms, which could easily be attributed to fuelexplosions.
What is the web address for this video - so i can post it in other forums?
pepik, there are 2 vids of the same demo.
here:
http://www.youtube.com/v/79sJ1bMR6VQ
and here:
http://www.dfw.com/multimedia/dfw/news/archive/0318implosion1/index.html
CT 'logic': A controlled demolition looks (and sounds) EXACTLY like the videos we see from WTC1, 2 and 7. Since this video does not look like any of the above it must be a fake. Debunked ;-)
OK theres alot of ways to impode a building... people like you guys just want to deny the truth huh?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home