9-11 Topsites: You Can't Handle the Truth!
Hmmm, I submitted SLC to 9-11 Topsites about a week or so ago, got the code, got a confirmation email. Yet somehow we're not showing up. I wonder why? Could it possibly be because it would be embarrassing to the 9-11 Denial Movement that a Debunking blog is one of the very top 9-11 Websites?
We're currently averaging 3280 pageviews per day. How does that stack up at 9-11 Topsites?
Ahem. It would rank us third right now, at about 90% of the pageviews of the "Scholars" for 9-11 Denial's website, and about half of 9-11 Blogger's. I submitted us as a 9-11 Investigation Site; we'd be the #1 site in that category by about 5-1. The famed Killtown blog? Gets about 170 page views a day according to 9-11 Topsites.
posted by Pat @ 8:55 PM
12 comments
12 Comments:
I have no idea how fire could pulverize concrete. However I'm willing to bet that a 30 story building falling on top of an 80 story building will do a lot of damage to the concrete in the building. It won't pulverize all of it, but it will crush a good deal. It will also crush all the drywall in the interior walls of the building.
Robert,
We have made nearly 800 posts since May, so if you do some reading we have addressed most of your questions, although I am sure you can always come up with new questions. Also check out the excellent 911myths and debunking911.
I didn't realize the fire threw steel beams hundreds of meters. That is a new one by me, although bizarrely when the conspiracy theorists aren't claiming the building feel into its own footprint, they are claiming it was blown every which way. Which is it?
Cheney was not commander of NORAD, you have been listening to Lauro Chavez. "Pull it" is not a demolitions term for blowing up a building, no matter how many times Jim Fetzer has claimed it is.
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/09/pull-it.html
Robert, Cheney was not in command of NORAD on 9-11. The most advance notice NEADS got of a hijacking on 9-11 was seven minutes for Flight 11, so there was no chance for "routine" intercept procedures. The kerosene did not blast the structural steel beams sideways hundreds of meters; they were propelled sideways by the force of the collapsing building. The concrete was only partially pulverized, explosions do not mean explosives, and Larry Silverstein would have to be one of the Three Stooges to admit "giving the order to blow up WTC 7".
Amazing. I've never met an Australian retard before....
Robert
How about a point-by-point rebuttal to PM's claims?
That's what PM did to your theories and what Mark's viewers' guide did to Loose Change.
Why have you toofers not filed charges so you could bring out all your so called experts?
You babble on and on asking the same dumb questions that have been answered by real experts. Why don't you give us scientific explanations and facts to explain your theories?
Because it doesn't work like that silly!
A simpleton named "Robert" shows up asking the same crap that has been debunked a thousand times. He is so contemptuous of reason that he is willing to repeat his silly canards without checking to find out why they're silly. He dismisses the NIST report and the Popular Mechanics book without having the slightest idea of what they contain.
Yes, Robert, the "questions" you pretend that people all over the world are asking have very definite answers. Those answers have been known for some time. If you can't comprehend the answers, or if you refuse to learn them, well, that means you're dumb.
Didn't you hear? Bali was really a mini-nuke set off by the CIA. I read it on the internet, it MUST be true!
So, have you guys got the answers to all the questions people are now asking all over the world?
Yes.
It's just that you've fooled the all rest of the world, who, in good faith, have passed all sorts of nasty "anti-terrorism" laws.
We were also behind 7/7, the Madrid bombings, the daily murders of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, USS Cole, a whole slew of embassy bombings, the Paris riots, the cartoon riots, the London bomb plot, and the first WTC bombings. You see, muslim extremists are basically a non-violent sort, not a threat to anybody. It's just that we asked them, as a favor, to blow up a couple of our buildings.
If you think terrorism isn't a threat in Australia, vote for someone who will repeal the onerous anti-terrorism laws. Your political leaders decisions are not my problem.
So if the Arabs don't want to sell it to you cheap, you should abide by that, like the good little right-wingers that you are (private property and all that?)
You're right. We should go to non-arab sources like Canada, Mexico, Venezuela and Nigeria. Hey, would you look at that. Those are 4 of the 5 top countries for U.S. oil imports.
I'll challenge you again, answer all those questions, which people all over the world are now beginning to ask - with physics, chemistry and forensic science.
I'll challenge you - answer them yourself. There's no such thing as a stupid question, just stupid people who have to ask the question.
Actually, robert, you made a bunch of baseless claims (buildings collapsed at free-fall, fire being the thing that pulverized concrete as opposed to falling 1000 feet and being crushed by more debris, beam blasts, Silverstein blowing up WTC7). YOU have to prove these claims true, not of the other Truthers have. The burden of proof is on YOU people.
"How come the towers came down in 8.4 and 10 seconds, free fall?"
Both towers took upwards of 20 seconds to collapse (8.4 seconds would be faster than free-fall - an impossibility).
So if the Arabs don't want to sell it to you cheap, you should abide by that, like the good little right-wingers that you are
...the war isn't about oil. If it was we wasted a whole bunch of money we could've used buying oil for the next century.
Next time research before you come here. All of you morons come along asking us to answer questions already answered. READ.
Hey SLC, I'm the owner of the 9/11 Topsites. The topsites serves only as a 9/11 Truth topsites. I am the owner and I decide which sites make it and which sites don't. Got it? Good.
Cheers,
Ethan
I, too, was censored a couple of times from 9/11 topsites, and I posted a little rant about the hypocritical censorship by the conspiradroids but eventually took it down.
Post a Comment
<< Home