Monday, November 13, 2006

Goyette Tapped for 9-11 Media Panel?

Charles Goyette, a Phoenix talk-radio host and 9-11 nutbar, has been named one of the media panelists for a South Carolina 9-11 Debate in March.

The National 9/11 Debate is pleased to announce that Charles Goyette has agreed to participate in the National 9/11 Debate on March 10, 2007 in Charleston, South Carolina. Mr. Goyette will be part of the media panel that will pose questions to the debate team members.


Looks like Uncle Fetzer has forgotten his promise to debate Mark Roberts, aka Gravy, at Franklin Pierce College.

13 Comments:

At 13 November, 2006 09:08, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

Has anyone heard if Mark Roberts will be joining the OS team?

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:00, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

Brilliant! If the way Goyette handed coburn his arse is anything to go by, the CTs will win this hands down.

 
At 13 November, 2006 11:30, Blogger James B. said...

I am still waiting for the Steven Jones vs Morgan Reynolds/Judy Wood debate. Of course Jim Fetzer can argue on either side.

Excellent!

 
At 13 November, 2006 13:43, Blogger default.xbe said...

Brilliant! If the way Goyette handed coburn his arse is anything to go by, the CTs will win this hands down.

isnt great when reality is a contest?

....oh wait...no it isnt

CTers still lose

 
At 13 November, 2006 15:14, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

Do you deny that goyette totally destroyed davins media career.

Davin had to cancel subsequent interviews.

Goyette is a legend.

 
At 13 November, 2006 15:32, Blogger shawn said...

Has anyone heard if Mark Roberts will be joining the OS team?

OS?

 
At 13 November, 2006 16:17, Blogger James B. said...

Why are the CTs excited to get someone on their side on the media panel? Isn't the whole point in a debate to have someone unbiased asking the questions? If we held a debate with Sean Hannity as the moderator would the CTs take it seriously...

 
At 13 November, 2006 17:59, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

Id love sean hannity to be the moderator. He would just say what he usually says:

"Planes hit towers, towers fell down"

Please ask sean to do it lol

 
At 13 November, 2006 19:40, Blogger pomeroo said...

PD, some of us actually listened to Goyette. No, he didn't "destroy" anything but his own credibility by ranting on and on about the video cameras at the Pentagon. This, AFTER it was explained to him that an object moving at over 700 feet per second would show up as a blur on the Philips LTC 1261 security cameras.
You still show little familiarity with the facts and persist in trying to con us.

 
At 14 November, 2006 05:08, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

Shawn, OS=Official Story side. Please see the opening page of Screw Loose Change to figure out most of the language on this blog. Study hard, there will be a quiz on Friday.

 
At 14 November, 2006 05:54, Blogger JPSlovjanski said...

Goyette used to be level headed and had good guests that actually KNEW what they were talking about, like Ray McGovern. I can actually vividly remember the day when asshole CTs started calling in more frequently and started peddling their nonsense. I think that idiot Wittenburg called in and started talking about how he flew the planes and they couldn't have done that. Charles didn't seem to be buying it.

Looks like they got him though- hook line and sinker.

 
At 14 November, 2006 11:16, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Goyette, according to the post, is to be a presenter of questions, so I am not sure he will be doing anything but asking them. He is not part of the CT debate team. So PD, he will not likely be handing anyone their "arse". Too bad they didnt get him on the debate team, then he might do as you said...oh but wait, he likely knows very little about the CT pseudofacts, so he wouldnt really be an asset to the team.

lol

TAM

 
At 14 November, 2006 19:01, Blogger shawn said...

Shawn, OS=Official Story side.

My mocking tone didn't come over well due to the internet.

I should've put it in scare quotes or something. There's no such thing as the "official story" - only what happened. It's like talking about the Holocaust and saying the "official story" or the moon landing and saying the "official story".

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home