Sunday, November 12, 2006

Uncle Fetzer and the Keebler Elf Lady

Now we are on to two people who can actually make Kevin Barrett look sane by comparison, Jim Fetzer, who is interviewing Judy Wood for his radio show. I swear, if Charles Darwin were alive he would be rethinking this whole evolution thing after listening to this show. Judy Wood expounds on her "Star Wars weapons destroyed the World Trade Center" theory, while Fetzer repeatedly screams excitedly, "Wow!". At one point early on, after claiming that the elections would have gone even more for the Democrats had the Diebold voting machines not been rigged, he proclaims that Wood is, "The single most qualified person to study what happened on 9/11".

Yeah, she is so qualfied that she describes the collapse of the WTC as "going poof". Unfortunately, I was not able to follow her argument due to the use of such overly technical language.

Amazingly the whole point of this elaborate death beam plot was to destroy the World Trade Center (she incorrectly claims that no buildings not titled "World Trade Center" were damaged in the attacks) without damaging any other buildings, or damaging the "bathtub". If the bathtub had been damaged, Wood claims that would have flooded lower Manhattan and destroyed half of New York. She even claims that the energy weapon plot extends to other buildings, such as WTC 3 and 6, so that they would be easier to destroy later on.

Yeah, OK.

My favorite line has to be when Wood proclaims, speaking about her mysterious Death Star weapon, "Just because you don’t know of the gizmo, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist."

Well, I don't know how to argue with that logic.

My new hero, though, has to be, Troy from West Virginia. He calls in at the 15 minute point of the second hour, with his West Virginia twang, and this incredulous sound in his voice. I had images in my head of Kyle from South Park cocking his head and saying "Really?".















Troy: I’m just also wondering, what makes you think that 200 technical experts from NIST would be wrong and your guest would be accurate?

Uncle Fetzer: Troy, Troy, Troy. Go to our website, ST911.org. We got a half a dozen dismissals. We’re talking about cutting edge research here Troy! I am not going back to NIST, they’ve been covering it all up. OK, thanks for calling Troy.

He then hangs up on him.

Yeah, real cutting edge research there Jim.











27 Comments:

At 13 November, 2006 00:34, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

"this gizmo"
"we done konw what we dont know...."
"I was looking at the data"

Supposedly Laser eye sugery is similar to this space based laser!!

EEEEEEK!!!!

AAAAAAH HA!!!!

Hmmmmm funny how we have all these "laser eye" commercials since 9/11,,,,,

WHERE IS DYLAN!!!!!

BUT!!!!

She is not saying "lasers" she is saying, "energy beam"

"from up above somewhere"

WAIT A MINUTE!!!!
TROY WAS JUST ASKING QUESTIONS!!!

Apparently the people who jumped thought that a helicopter with a net might catch them!!

This according to JW!

"The steele was never there" JW

Boy they love to promote their websites!!

Micro nukes could have been used!!
This according to Luke from Iowa!!
Judy does a great job though defendig her "Energy beam" against the "micro nukes".

LOL!!
2 NUTJOBS ARGUING WITH EACH OTHER!
PRICELESS!!!

"JUST FALL DOWN AND GO BOOM" JW

"ROLLING BROWN SMOKE" Luke from Iowa

CRACK HEADS!!

Luke did say something i can agree with:
"If you come up with anything too exoitc then your just wingnuts"

John Lenon must be rolling in his grave!

Russ from West Virginia then calls in suggesting that "black ops" personnell may have thrown some of these jumpers!!

I then could not stand this bullshit anymore and wanted to crawl through my monitor and beat Fetzer and Wood to death with some super secret laser.

Its very disgusting hos the 911 denial movement TIME AND TIME AGAIN talk about the vicitms of 911 in such a vile and disgusting maaner.

 
At 13 November, 2006 03:38, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Conspiracy theorists are vile creatures. They use the victims when they are losing in an arguement or if they want to avoid a point of discussion.

Debunker: "Well explain why the NIST report makes no mention of explosive devices in WTC 1 & 2."

CTer: "Well why don't you tell Donna O'Connor she is wrong heh? Come on, what are you chicken? She lost her daughter in 911, why don't you say this to her face?"

The above, is what is truely disgusting.

I am sure PD will have a comment on this.

TAM

 
At 13 November, 2006 04:51, Blogger troy said...

You're welcome. And yes I am that guy. But c'mon. I grew up in Charleston. It's a large city. What's this WV twang talk?

 
At 13 November, 2006 04:52, Blogger Alex said...

Judy Wood is a living testament to the fact that, on occasion, the laws of Darwin break down, and the laws of Murphy take over.

 
At 13 November, 2006 04:55, Blogger troy said...

Why don't you people call these talk shows? I actually like Alex Jones and Jack Blood. I don't agree with them but I find them entertaining.

The others like Fetzer and Onkleist I can't stand.

 
At 13 November, 2006 05:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone know the site of Woods and that other guy about the laserbeam, cause i could use a really good laugh :D

 
At 13 November, 2006 05:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nvermind, i found it, and indeed i'm gonna have a really good laugh :)

 
At 13 November, 2006 05:26, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hell that Judy Woods sounds like a 12 year old.

 
At 13 November, 2006 05:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder if even Fetzer believes this crap.

 
At 13 November, 2006 06:42, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Someone got a Steinway in her head.

 
At 13 November, 2006 07:38, Blogger James B. said...

No offense intended Troy. I am from Seattle, in my mind everyone east of Spokane talks with an accent.

 
At 13 November, 2006 08:28, Blogger Jujigatami said...

What a discussion between a denier and a sane person open to the conspiracy idea might sound like:

Denier: No way a bunch of arabs living in tents blew up the WTC.

Sane person: Yeah, No way!

Denier: There were no arabs, it was all Mossad agents that flew the planes...

Sane person: Um OK.

Denier: It wasn't Mossad, it was the CIA...

Sane person: Sure, I guess we did fund Osama, right?

Denier: It wasn't the planes that took down the towers, it was bombs, the planes were just a diversion.

Sane person: Um, OK bombs, but why fly the planes if you have bombs planted?

Denier: It wasn't only bombs, it was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION...

Sane person: What? It doesn't look controlled at all! How could the explosives have survuved the plane crashe?

Denier: There were NO PLANES!! What?

Sane person: Are you kidding?

Denier: The planes were holograms or CGI...

Sane person: But wait, thousands of people saw the planes hit, and what about the passengers?

Denier: It was all a plot to damage the WTC "Bathtub", and flood lower Manhattan!

Sane person: But wait, even if the bathtub flooded, it wouldn't have overflowed the WTC foundation! Lower manhattan isn't below sea level! The Bathtub was only created because the foundation of the WTC had to be dub so low and tunnels that went under the hudson river entered it below sea level... oh forget it.

Denier: Not only were there no planes, and no explosives, but the entire disaster was peretrated by our government using a "Star Wars Beam Weapon".

Sane person: WHAT THE FUCK??? ARE YOU RETARDED??? That is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. Are you on drugs? Seriously.

Denier: You're obviously a government shill.

 
At 13 November, 2006 09:39, Blogger James B. said...

Yeah, I think Ms. Wood confused New Orleans with New York. Fortunately Ray Nagin was not mayor of New York.

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:07, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

I hate to agree with you people but im afraid I have to here.

Fetzer and wood are either insane or deliberately making stuff up to discredit us.

If fetzer mentions this on fox i will kill myself

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Finally PD sees the light ;)

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:16, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

Fetzer just seems to agree with whoever is talking to him at the time.

On last weeks show he had steven jones on and he was totally agreeing with the thermite theory.

He is a fraud.

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:19, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeh, he just likes to stir op things. he don't care what really happened, he just likes the attention.

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:22, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

Agreed. Fetzer is disgusting.

I dont think steven jones is like that though. He has maintained the same hypothesis and tried to communicate with NIST.

I still think his thermite hypothesis is compelling.

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well u got the right to find that compelling, although u won't get many supporters down here for that hypothesis ;)

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:48, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its guys like Fetzer that makes the "911 truth" movement look even more stupid.

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:48, Blogger Alex said...

How is it possible to find something compelling when the only "evidence" for it is that technically speaking, it maybe would have been possible if some department somewhere spent years researching it, and then got hundreds of people to help pull it off?

I think my Gremlin Demolition Theory is equally compelling.

 
At 13 November, 2006 10:56, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow Alex, that indeed is really compelling!

Anyone tried to debunk that one yet?

 
At 13 November, 2006 13:24, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 13 November, 2006 13:25, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

Steven Jones and Judy Wood are both insane.

I could claim a giant dog turd fell out of the sky and caused the towers to collapse that would be "compelling" as well.

 
At 14 November, 2006 11:21, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

It was Cartman. I think he caused 9/11, and then went all CT to throw everyone in South Park off.

Compelling?

TAM

 
At 15 November, 2006 11:15, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't like Fetzer either. He doesn't let his guests speak and speaks for them. He does do a good job of paraphrasing their arguments for the benefit of guests, I'll give him that, but he is kind of a blow hard. The comment about Donna O'Conner was wrong, unless she agrees with the "CTs" and has given authorization for her name to be used in such a fashion. And it was the wrong reponse -- the right response was to explain why NIST did not find explosives, if you can. Did Fetzer make it?

I'm assuming when you guys make fun of Woods that you are aware that space-based beam weapons are a goal of the Air Force -- see, e.g. Vision 2020, and that the true state of progress would be highly classified. It still seems hard to believe that a beam weapon could generate such power from space. Could a space-based or high altitude mirror reflect a beam generated on earth back down? Don't know.

I'm not saying she is right, but you're going to have to do better than this. What she is saying is highly speculative, but she has made her assumptions and reasoning clear. It's a serious allegation, and deserves a serious response.

What she is saying is not beyond the realm of reason, unlike the mechanism of "global collapse" we are being asked to believe.

 
At 15 November, 2006 14:13, Blogger Alex said...

I'm not saying she is right, but you're going to have to do better than this.

Don't be an idiot. We don't have to do any better because her statement is preposterous. I feel no more need to debunk her x-ray laser theory than I would if she had suggested that the WTC was blown up by a meteorite impact. Both are "serious allegations" but both are also "beyond the realm of reason". If you can't understand that, well, I really feel sorry for you. Behind your pseudo-scientific veneer, you're so confused about life in general that you can't even differentiate between a plausible theory and an insane one.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home