There's a Denier Born Every Minute
This one's particularly bad:
The facts....hmmm ok
The buildings fell at free fall speed after the planes crashed into them.
Each tower had a steel framework that cannot be melted by aviation fuel. It doesnt get hot enough
The first building to fall was from the second plane that crashed, how weird is that.
WTC 7 was demolished it could not have collapsed from the small fire that burnt in it.
There is so much evidence, search on google video, and instead of just listening to the government and believing the crap they come out with like sheep. Make up your own minds after seeing the facts.
posted by Pat @ 11:47 PM
9 comments
9 Comments:
Make up your own minds after seeing the facts.
The Troother imbeciles wouldn't know a fact if it hit them in the face and yelled "I am a fact!"
They would still deny it.
There's so much wrong in there - the general lazieness and irony that is obvious once the guy/gal says to look at all the facts and make up your own mind - that it makes me cry.
How are such people able to, let alone allowed to, use the internet?
"Check on google video"
Y'know, 'cause its more accurate that professionals.
I really expected a bit more than "search on google video" when that guy started talking about evidence. Could it be that these people consider as evidence the stuff they watched in a "documentary" like Loose Change? They can't be that naive.
I don't get this... Most of this stuff is Truther trash from years ago. They themselves have tossed aside most of those claims and moved on, but a bunch of people seemed to have gone into hibernation immediately after hearing this nonsense, and are now waking up (*cough*) to regurgitate not just nonsense, but years-old, moldy nonsense...
The irony used to be funny. Know its just sad.
Cl1mh4224rd said...
I don't get this... Most of this stuff is Truther trash from years ago. They themselves have tossed aside most of those claims and moved on,
I'm inclined to disagree. They're still suck on whether even any planes were involved. Stephen Jones' jolly thermite paper is still the closest they get to framing a hypothesis, David Ray Griffin's rehashing of basically every irrelevent detail and false claim about the hijackers is still the bulk of their allegedly academic work on the background of the attacks, etc. They can't progress with such weak gruel so they just swirl their spoon around in it.
The OP reads like the "9/11 CT for dummies". We really should put one of those together as a file, than post it over at JREF. Tell all visiting truthers to read it first, and that if any of their arguments relate to its contents, than they might as well just turn around and leave....lol.
TAM
Priceless!
Post a Comment
<< Home