Friday, January 26, 2007

He's Baaa-aaack

As we have mentioned before, old conspiracy myths never die, no matter how many times they have been debunked. In a Loose Change Forum thread on the previously mentioned Irish Television cancelling of Loose Change (which they universally denounce as censorship) Mark Roberts asks for proof that NORAD carried out hijacking drills on September 11th. A poster immediately replies with:

CENTCOM whistleblower Sergeant Lauro "LJ" Chavez says "all" the exercises that day were "hijacks."


Oh brother. One more time, and pay attention this time. He is a fake.

7 Comments:

At 26 January, 2007 13:38, Blogger CHF said...

Is this the same guy who landed in Kabul while the Taliban still controlled the place and who later helped Tommy Franks sell potery on e-bay?

For any twoofers out there who STILL don't get it: ol' Chavez is just having a laugh.

 
At 26 January, 2007 14:19, Blogger Alex said...

Yeah he was General Franks' computer buddy, but I think the guy who landed in Kabul "under fire" in a C-17 was actually Jessie Macbeth. Different clown, same comedy sketch.

 
At 26 January, 2007 15:49, Blogger James B. said...

No, he claimed that he landed in Kabul under fire in a C-5, apparently 6 weeks before anyone noticed that we took Kabul. MacBeth pretended to be a Ranger in Iraq.

 
At 26 January, 2007 16:34, Blogger Alex said...

Well, there ya go. It's hard to keep track of which nut claimed what. You're right though, I remember him going on about his ride in the bullet-proof C-5.

 
At 26 January, 2007 19:08, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

It is like those bigfoot pictures. Every now and then you'll get a fresh brown blur in the woods that someone will present, but then sooner or later they resort back to those same photos of the guy in the gorilla suit from back in the 60s-70s

TAM

 
At 28 January, 2007 07:22, Blogger Swing Dangler said...

To Mark 'I try to rewrite history' Roberts:

What Crossing the Rubicon has documented conclusively is that there was a live-fly drill taking place on 9/11 titled Vigilant Warrior. Richard Clarke disclosed the name of this drill on page 4 of his book, but it was Major Don Arias of NORAD who confirmed the definition of the title "Warrior" to Mike Ruppert via email.

Warrior = JCS/HQ NORAD sponsored FTX, or field training exercise (live-fly).

That means that the Vigilant Warrior drill conducted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff involved at least one real commercial aircraft in the skies, intended to simulate exactly the kind of airliner hijack emergency presented on 9/11. Coincidence?

This was further supported by an April 18 2004 USA Today article titled, "NORAD had drills of jets as weapons." http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/
exec/view.cgi/8/4217

Geez so much for Pat's 'we couldn't imagine theory for 9/11 Another OS myth debunked.

The report cited NORAD officials who confirmed live-fly drills were conducted using hijacked airliners originating from the continental United States used as weapons crashing into targets including the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
The specific drill USA Today referred to was "planned in July [2001] and conducted later" - likely on 9/11 itself.
Source:http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/
ww3/011805_simplify_case.shtml

I have yet to see Crossing...debunked.

 
At 28 January, 2007 15:05, Blogger Alex said...

That means that the Vigilant Warrior drill conducted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff involved at least one real commercial aircraft in the skies, intended to simulate exactly the kind of airliner hijack emergency presented on 9/11. Coincidence?

For the ten millionth time: YES.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home