Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Bermas for Governor!

I found this radio interview of Jason Bermas linked on the Loose Change forum. I about fell off of the couch listening to this part:

And I really don't want to go into politics, but, you know, I live in New York, and if I had to, I would consider running for governor, if no one is going to do anything. Because, at least you can do something at a state level. I am not saying I could win, but I could get out there, especially if the movie is as big as it is going to be. We need somebody who is going to challenge the norms, and really go after these guys and make them he held accountable.

We can only hope. Heck, I think I would donate to his campaign just to have the opportunity to hear him trying to explain his economic plan.

Run Jason, run!

Labels:

19 Comments:

At 28 February, 2007 18:13, Blogger Pat said...

He may have missed the fact that New York won't be electing another governor until 2010.

:)

 
At 28 February, 2007 19:23, Blogger BG said...

Maybe New York could organize a recall of the current Gov. like CA did to get Arnold in.

 
At 28 February, 2007 19:50, Blogger CHF said...

I am not saying I could win....

You can't win with "84%" support?

How can that be?

 
At 28 February, 2007 20:10, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

This is why I am running for Chief Animal Control Officer of Strathcona County.

If the current authorities aren't interested in truth, someone will have to make them!

 
At 28 February, 2007 22:11, Blogger BG said...

The latest in the BBC / WTC 7 Dustup:

Nailing the BBC for Shrugging Their Shoulders and Saying How Should We Know? (about WTC 7)

 
At 28 February, 2007 22:34, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

BG -

1.) Submit your evidence that there is a "dustup" or an improper verb tense usage 6 years ago on the BBC.

2.) Submit your evidence that the BBC has been "nailed".

3.) Submit your evidence that anyone outside the small community of CT debunkers and/or the even smaller community of CT believers gives a flying @#$%.

4.) Submit your evidence that you are not a Jenny Sparks sock puppet.

 
At 28 February, 2007 23:17, Blogger BG said...

Oh yes, Sword...

you like the idea of me submitting.. don't you.

Well I say to you what the Gingerbread Man said in Shrek (I).

 
At 28 February, 2007 23:19, Blogger Richard said...

I have a question for you to bg, why? How does this fit into the conspiracy. There is plenty of evidence that shows that pretty much everybody knew that 7 was going to come down. What was the point of the conspirators giving this info to the BBC?

 
At 28 February, 2007 23:21, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

Wow... a thinly veiled gay joke.

You're what... 13 years old?

 
At 01 March, 2007 00:39, Blogger 9/11 Questions said...

That's an odd thing to say...didn't a Truther run for the senate somewhere and get 2.4% of the vote?

 
At 01 March, 2007 04:10, Blogger 911DD said...

Oxy-Moron quote of the day:

"...especially if the movie is as big as it is going to be."?

 
At 01 March, 2007 05:29, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Like hey man, Loose Change he FINAL CUT, it's gonna be huge! Huge!

 
At 01 March, 2007 09:37, Blogger BG said...

Richard said...
I have a question for you to bg, why? How does this fit into the conspiracy. There is plenty of evidence that shows that pretty much everybody knew that 7 was going to come down. What was the point of the conspirators giving this info to the BBC?


Fair Question. I'll be making a blog entry on this and posting a link here, hopefully by tomorrow a.m.

 
At 01 March, 2007 10:05, Blogger BG said...

Richard

As I have posted recently here, I want to make clear that I respect that what happened to WTC 7 is an issue which is rightly under the purview of scientists and engineers.

Using logic, an part of reasoned argument, one would have to affirm that what was broadcast by the BBC or any other news media, or what was later said or not said by Silverstein (or anyone else) has no direct bearing on analyzing the the evidence of the building collapses of 9/11.

If you, Richard, or others here, have already basicly concluded that nothing unusual was witnessed, and there is no evidence to support anything other than the official story, when wtc 7 fell, then I admit this BBC stuff has no meaning.

Blog Post: Response to Commentor at SLC Blog

 
At 01 March, 2007 11:01, Blogger BG said...

Sword of Truth said...

Wow... a thinly veiled gay joke.

You're what... 13 years old?


I don't really think telling someone to "Eat Me" is a gay joke. Not that it matters, but since people already are calling me anti-Jew here, I don't need the anti-gay label as well.

Or maybe anti-gay is ok here, but not anti-Jew?

 
At 01 March, 2007 11:04, Blogger Rowe_Korey said...

I'd vote for Jason.

That way he'd move out of the house.

and get his teeth fixed.

 
At 01 March, 2007 11:18, Blogger Alex said...


If you, Richard, or others here, have already basicly concluded that nothing unusual was witnessed, and there is no evidence to support anything other than the official story, when wtc 7 fell, then I admit this BBC stuff has no meaning.


Good, then piss off.

 
At 01 March, 2007 12:09, Blogger Sword of Truth said...

As I have posted recently here, I want to make clear that I respect that what happened to WTC 7 is an issue which is rightly under the purview of scientists and engineers.

Riiiiigghhht...

 
At 02 March, 2007 15:15, Blogger Triterope said...

Expect more of this sort of thing as Loose Change fades further and further into irrelevance. The more Dylan Avery and his buddies fade from the national consciousness, the bigger and more grandiose their aspirations will become.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home