Is There No End to Rosie's Talents?
She's apparently an artist as well:
The sad thing? This hideous piece of "art" sold for $2,501 on ebay.
Yes, I know it has nothing to do with 9-11.
Labels: Rosie O'Donnell
posted by Pat @ 8:48 PM
37 comments
37 Comments:
Coming from a family of abstract artists and textiles, I have to say that this is one ugly piece of shit.
Yes, I know it has nothing to do with 9-11.
Not specifically, but it does look like a MASCAL (MAss CAsuaLty) excercise. =P
I love this industrial strength debunking.
Rosie is fat.
Rosie's art is rubbish.
LOL
You people are running scared. You couldn't sell your asses for 10 dollars, nevermind a painting for 2000.
Your time is up.
Well, people will buy anything as 'art' these days. I ought to have taken art at college. Or something.
Your time is up.
Yes, we're very scared of people so dumb we could've debunked them when we were in first grade.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Wow, I can actually agree with you guys on here.
That is a really bad piece of art that has nothing to do with Rosie's public stance on 9/11.
Then again, beauty is in the eye of the beholder which begs the question, why would you expose it to "millions" of viewers?
Rosie O'Donnell could take a shit in a jar and it would sell for $2,501 on eBay. That's typical American celebrity worship. I understand that. What I don't understand is how relentless mediocrities like Rosie O'Donnell -- best known to me as the unfunny host of a stand-up show on VH1 back around 1988 -- become such huge celebrities that millions are influenced by what they say.
I distinctly remember when she first adopted kids and went on this "mother" theme for at least a year. She's probably still doing it. It's like: "Bitch, you adopted children because you refuse to have sex with men, and they probably wouldn't even if you wanted them to! Stop going on and on about motherhood!"
I'm no fan of Rosie but adoption is frequently the choice of lesbian mothers (as opposed to choosing or hiring a surrogate father) and they are every bit as much mothers as straight married or single mothers who adopt, who bear their own children or who choose or employ a surrogate. I'm not aware that Ms. O'Donnell is anything other than an outstanding mother to her children.
you've been rumbled by "expert debunkers"
And who would they be?
I am not saying that adopted parents, lesbian or not, can't be mothers.
I deeply appreciate you clarifying your comments -- I have to say the first version seemed uncharacteristic for you and unseemly in any event. Thank you for this second comment.
As for going all "mommy," yes, that can get annoying. But it really is a life-changing experience and Ms. O'Donnell was not the first nor will she be the last mom to lose some eyesight whilst looking through the prism of her kids.
The one I remember was gun control. She was very pro-gun control.
Well, yes and no.
Rosie is very adamant that she doesn't want you and me to have a gun. But she also hires armed guards for herself and her kids.
She believes that only she is allowed to keep and bear arms.
This comment has been removed by the author.
I'm not glossying over anything, you're dodging my question. What is it that you think you've "debunked"?
This comment has been removed by the author.
I'm wondering about that too. That blog link leads to an "article" that looks like the written version of Rosie's painting. The gyst of it seems to be that she thinks that either Nico is working for us, or we're all working for the New World Order, or something along those lines, although it's pretty much impossible to tell exactly what she's driving at, let alone what her evidence is.
I'm not really interested in what relationship they may or may not have with Nico Haupt, I've still to see anyone honestly engage their arguements using real evidence and expert opinions instead of the same tired old memes.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Either you're just as naive as Shawn
Jenny, I'll tell you what I've told the other morons - stop with the irony. I know it's unintentional, but maybe you should, I dunno, reread your posts to make sure they don't look laughable to anyone with an IQ over 80.
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Well, ofcourse there's something "dodgy". I've admitted multiple times that we're working for the new world order. Pat's our general manager, and James runs the tactical ops department. Nico's just our mailroom guy - he doesn't even get access to the NWO cafeteria.
And I'd absolutely LOVE to see what your garden looks like. Everyone knows it's physically impossible to grow tomatoes in their own footprint! I hope you've used sufficient amounts of thermate, otherwise only Judy Wood's space laser will be able to provide enough energy to make the plants grow.
You have no concern, whatsoever, that Screw Loose--a respected debunk site--to you-- would work with an alledged "twoother" who's known to be a shill. That would in no way make you wonder about the quality of their info or their methods.
Your use of the word "work" there is interesting.
Their relationship with Nico appears to me to be at the most a case of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", and I'd need more than that to throw doubt on their info or their methods. If you have doubts about their info or their methods why don't you engage with them directly instead of playing guilt-by-association. You know that if we play that game the twoofers are going to come off worse.
As for going all "mommy," yes, that can get annoying. But it really is a life-changing experience and Ms. O'Donnell was not the first nor will she be the last mom to lose some eyesight whilst looking through the prism of her kids.
Yeah, but there's something kind of shallow when celebrities do it. Some of these people talk about adopting a kid as if they'd be embarassed to be in People magainze without one. Then they expect a book deal and a Lifetime Achievement Award if they actually fulfill any of the basic tasks related to parenting.
Especially these people who collect children from third-world countries like they're building a stamp collection. Something bugs me about that. What, exactly, motivates someone to go halfway around the globe to adopt a baby when there's 5,000 kids in their own zip code that need parents? It's enough to make me question their sincerity.
And what happens to these kids when mommyhood stops being a Hollywood fad? I'm sure these kids who wound up as part of a familial Benetton ad are well taken care of. But I can't help but be reminded of a classic Richard Pryor observation: "What in the hell have we got here, Margo?"
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
So now you don't believe me? Here I am, an NWO insider, trying to help you out, and you won't even listen. What do I have to do? Film myself sacrificing a Palestinian baby in the Bohemian grove?
I think you better tell the other 90% of the twoof movement that Judy has no credibility, since they keep quoting her on a regular basis.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Um, what do you think posting about it here, on their own site, is? That's as direct as it's likly to get--and they've prefered to avoid the issue.
Like I said, you're just playing guilt-by-association(something you object to debunkers doing) rather than actually engaging with their arguements and evidence against the twoofer claims.
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
You might convince someone if presented them with some oh I don't know, EVIDENCE?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Evidence of anything would be a step up from what you usually post, Jenny.
OK fine, let's have some evidence of that then.
This comment has been removed by the author.
I bet the bull felt some relief after dropping that one
Post a Comment
<< Home