Jim Fetzer is a Big Fat Liar

Over at the Loose Change Forum, they are ganging up on Uncle Fetzer, because he was on a radio show earlier today proposing the no plane theory. Fetzer continues his usual intellectual flexibility, because one poster pointed out that just last week Fetzer said that he suspected it may have been military planes, at the 20 minute mark of the interview:

Well the airplanes did hit it, which I suspect may have been military versions of 767s with extra fuel. These are the types of planes that refuel fighters in the air.

Of course as usual, Fetzer is lying, because the US military did not have 767 refuelers in 2001. In fact they still don't. Even more, I know that Fetzer is aware of this, because I told him so in an e-mail exchange that I had with him on July 5th, 2006, in which I sent him this link, and a few others. He replied back to this, saying that he couldn't believe I would think the US did not have aerial refuelers in 2001.

Of course the US Air Force did, to which I pointed out that the two models of refuelers the US Air Force does have, the KC-135, and the KC-10, have 4 and 3 engines each, and could not easily be mistaken for a 2 engine 767. He pretty much gave up the argument at that point.

Do these people have any standards at all?