Thursday, March 08, 2007

Jim Fetzer is a Big Fat Liar

Over at the Loose Change Forum, they are ganging up on Uncle Fetzer, because he was on a radio show earlier today proposing the no plane theory. Fetzer continues his usual intellectual flexibility, because one poster pointed out that just last week Fetzer said that he suspected it may have been military planes, at the 20 minute mark of the interview:


Well the airplanes did hit it, which I suspect may have been military versions of 767s with extra fuel. These are the types of planes that refuel fighters in the air.

Of course as usual, Fetzer is lying, because the US military did not have 767 refuelers in 2001. In fact they still don't. Even more, I know that Fetzer is aware of this, because I told him so in an e-mail exchange that I had with him on July 5th, 2006, in which I sent him this link, and a few others. He replied back to this, saying that he couldn't believe I would think the US did not have aerial refuelers in 2001.

Of course the US Air Force did, to which I pointed out that the two models of refuelers the US Air Force does have, the KC-135, and the KC-10, have 4 and 3 engines each, and could not easily be mistaken for a 2 engine 767. He pretty much gave up the argument at that point.

Do these people have any standards at all?

Labels:

4 Comments:

At 09 March, 2007 01:21, Blogger The Girl in Grey said...

Maybe that's why he's now a no-planer?

 
At 09 March, 2007 05:52, Blogger 911_truthiness said...

Maybe that's why he's now a no-planer?

But still a no-brainer

 
At 09 March, 2007 06:44, Blogger CHF said...

Fetzer really is the poster child of 9/11 idiocy.

He knows 9/11 was an inside job but he doesn't quite know how, so he goes from one pile of shit to the next thinking "THIS is the proof I'm looking for!"

When that doesn't pan out he flies off to find another turd.

 
At 09 March, 2007 19:39, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

I think he has short term memory loss. He reads something, spues it as the truth, then reads something else, forgets the first thing, and spues the second thing as the truth, and so on, and so on....

TAM

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home