Monday, February 08, 2010

Robin Hordon Commits Perjury

As a long time resident of the Puget Sound I am always especially annoyed by Robin Hordon, who insists he is an expert on the events of 9/11 based on the merits of having been an air traffic controller 30 years ago. Now he is getting even more bizarre though, with this long rambling "affidavit" filed to support April Gallop's quixotic lawsuit against Dick Cheney et al.

There is no way I am so bored as to actually try and dissasemble this whole thing, but one only needs to look at a single paragraph to see how bad his so called expertise is.


It is known that Chic Burlingame, the pilot of AA77, participated in a military analysis of the Pentagon’s defenses approximately one year before 9/11/2001, while on National Guard duty. That military analysis included a simulation involving a hijacked airliner used as an airborne bomb in an attack upon the Pentagon. This coincidence is suspicious, in my opinion.

Members of Burlingame’s family have also stated categorically that Burlingame, a large and powerfully-built man, would NEVER have voluntarily surrendered control of his aircraft to ANYONE, let alone hijackers wielding small box-cutter knives who are known to have been considerably smaller in build and shorter in height.


OK, well let's count the lies and poor logic. First of all, there is no evidence at all that CPT Burlingame ever participated in "a military analysis of the Pentagon's defenses". There was, it is true, a MASCAL exercise at the Pentagon, which involved a plane crashing into the Pentagon as part of the scenario, but there is nothing to show that it involved a hijacker airliner, as opposed to an accident, given there is a major international airport just next door. As the name indicates, a mass casualty exercise is not a defense exercise, but a triage and medical response exercise, and there is nothing to show that he played a significant role in it, or even participated at all, other than the fact that he, along with 24,000 of his closest friends happened to work there at the time. Furthermore, and this is a picky thing admittedly, but it shows how little effort they put into accuracy, but Burlingame was a Captain in the Navy, so unless they have suddenly created a Navy National Guard, it is doubtful he was serving there on National Guard duty.

The second paragraph is just insulting. He didn't voluntarily give up anything, he was under duress. Have they no respect for the victims?

The last I checked it was a felony to lie in a court document. I guess Hordon can use the fact that he is a f***ing moron as an excuse for perjury.

Update: In typical troofer fashion, the post to which I linked on 911 Blogger has been removed without explanation. Destroy the evidence.

80 Comments:

At 08 February, 2010 18:29, Blogger Billman said...

Hell, the Navy does Mass casualty drills on a nearly daily basis on EACH OF THEIR SHIPS... And the cause of the "mass casualty" was always changing on my ship. From another ship hitting us, to a missile, to a plane, etc... why wouldn't a government installation do the same? OH WAIT! THEY DO!

 
At 08 February, 2010 18:52, Blogger Triterope said...

The last I checked it was a felony to lie in a court document.

Maybe, but the whole thing is so stupid nobody's going to bother. It's a frivolous affidavit attached to a frivolous lawsuit. LashL from JREF has an excellent take on the April Gallop lawsuit to which Robin Hordon's tl;dr nonsense is attached. Here's the money quote:

April Gallop sought, negotiated, and accepted a settlement on the basis that Flight 77 was hijacked by terrorists and crashed into the Pentagon and, therefore, she cannot now purport to seek damages on the basis that Flight 77 was not hijacked by terrorists, and did not crash into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

 
At 08 February, 2010 22:23, Anonymous Brian Good said...

I read the Hordon affidavit several months ago and it was so bad I could barely get through it. I'm pretty sure the version that was filed with the court had been edited by the lawyer Bill Veale.

Hordon made anti-semitic remarks when he attended one of our San Francisco truth meetings a few years ago and I've always been ashamed that I didn't call him out on it. He is a very big, self-assured, and charismatic man and I guess I was afraid of him.

That's why I stick to picking on losers like Barrett, Rodriguez, Ranke, and Balsamo.

 
At 08 February, 2010 22:34, Anonymous Brian Good's Valet said...

"I've always been ashamed that I didn't call him out on it. He is a very big, self-assured, and charismatic man and I guess I was afraid of him"

Brian, you should have called him out on it. The YouTube video you getting crap kicked out of you would have very popular. Not to mention you could have added the following to your resume:


MMA Fighter
Medical Professional
and possibly Funeral Home Director

 
At 08 February, 2010 22:36, Anonymous Brian Good said...

Not just those four losers; I also pick on the loser Condi Rice, the Fall Gal for 9/11. Who then lied under oath to the 9/11 widows.

 
At 08 February, 2010 22:58, Anonymous NoIdentity said...

Nothing like a good false equivalence.

 
At 08 February, 2010 23:43, Anonymous Brian Good's Chef said...

Condi kicking your ass would be entertaining too.

 
At 09 February, 2010 00:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Condi couldn't even kick a college student's ass.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijEED_iviTA

She had to resort to beating him up about a piece of trivia. She said amazingly stupid things about the UN Convention on Torture, and her belief that if the President orders it it's legal is a big laugh. She was the Fall Gal for 9/11. Nice work if you can find it.

 
At 09 February, 2010 02:55, Anonymous paul w said...

"I guess Hordon can use the excuse that he is a f***ing moron as an excuse for perjury."

Come on, James, tell us what you really thing!

Yes, I know, the pricks are insulting, but I liked the quote.

Maybe his lawyer could use it????

 
At 09 February, 2010 04:49, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Who then lied under oath to the 9/11 widows."

No she didn't.

And nobody gives a flying fuckk anyway.

 
At 09 February, 2010 05:25, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

Mr B,

If you believe a crime - specifically, that of perjury - has been committed have you contacted the proper authorities and informed them of your findings in any way, form or shape?

 
At 09 February, 2010 05:25, Anonymous New Yorker said...

That's why I stick to picking on losers like Barrett, Rodriguez, Ranke, and Balsamo.

But you don't pick on losers like Richard Gage and David Ray Griffin, even though they deserve it just as much.

 
At 09 February, 2010 06:15, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"If you believe a crime - specifically, that of perjury - has been committed have you contacted the proper authorities and informed them of your findings in any way, form or shape?"

That's your job, boron.

Just let us know the decibel level of the laughter of the authorities that you regale with your paranoid fantasies.

 
At 09 February, 2010 07:07, Blogger Triterope said...

If you believe a crime - specifically, that of perjury - has been committed have you contacted the proper authorities and informed them of your findings?

Boris makes a valid point here. Hey, we're always telling the Twoofkiddies to take their evidence before the authorities.

 
At 09 February, 2010 07:24, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

No, seriously Boris, you stalker, when are you going to take your evidence of mass murder to a court?

 
At 09 February, 2010 07:38, Blogger James B. said...

If I actually believed this lawsuit would get anywhere, then I would. I am sure it will be laughed out of court though, and no prosecutor would waste his time on misconduct by a crackpot witness.

 
At 09 February, 2010 07:47, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

James B.: you are right about this one.

 
At 09 February, 2010 08:15, Blogger James B. said...

And as I somewhat alluded to in the text, perjury requires you to prove they had the intent to lie. Being a clueless moron would actually be a defense.

 
At 09 February, 2010 08:26, Blogger Billman said...

Perjury is pretty hard to prove.

 
At 09 February, 2010 09:09, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

James,

You're engaging in making distinctions. Boris the Stalker won't understand.

 
At 09 February, 2010 09:10, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Interesting paper on Conspiracy Theories with a focus on 9/11. Some great insight into conspiracy thinking in general.

Cass R. Sunstein
Harvard University - Harvard Law School

Adrian Vermeule
Harvard University - Harvard Law School
January 15, 2008

PDF.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1084585&rec=1&srcabs=292149

"Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy."


"...people suffer from a “crippled epistemology,” in the sense that they know very few things, and what they know is wrong.30 Many extremists fall in this category; their extremism stems not from irrationality, but from the fact that they have little (relevant) information, and their extremist views are supported by what little they know"

Well this explains all those question asked as if they prove something.

 
At 09 February, 2010 09:20, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

clickable link to that paper

 
At 09 February, 2010 09:26, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

To Mr B:

If I actually believed this lawsuit would get anywhere, then I would. I am sure it will be laughed out of court though, and no prosecutor would waste his time on misconduct by a crackpot witness.

I assume you are responding to me, hence allow me to respond to this too.

Perjury is a crime. It is not for you but rather for the legal system to decide whether or not a crime ought to be prosecuted. Hence what you stated above is but a cop-out.

 
At 09 February, 2010 09:29, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

If I actually believed this lawsuit would get anywhere, then I would. I am sure it will be laughed out of court though,

Is being uninformed and truly believing bullshit the same as lying? To prosecute you would need to prove the guy knew what he was saying was false, I imagine police get all kinds of false reports from paranoid people thinking there are being followed or aliens are probing them at night. You humor them and go back to doing real work.

 
At 09 February, 2010 10:52, Blogger Triterope said...

It is not for you but rather for the legal system to decide whether or not a crime ought to be prosecuted.

And if the 9-11 Truth movement would follow that advice, the world would be a better place.

 
At 09 February, 2010 11:19, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris,

Wrong stalker turd. We private citizens make calls on what is or is not a crime all the time.

For instance, while you've engaged in stalking behavior, I don't think it's yet risen to the level prohibited by statute. I might be wrong, but, in any event, I don't think you should face prosecution or a civil suit. See, that was an easy - and why would I want to bother the courts with my opinion?

 
At 09 February, 2010 11:26, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

To Triterope:

I guess the qualification I should've made was that the legal system be functional. In regards to 9/11 it is clearly not - similarly to how it was dysfunctional when it came time to address racial crimes against the Blacks prior to the civil rights movement (and, sadly, those defects are still not fully in the past but we are getting a bit off topic here).

 
At 09 February, 2010 11:29, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

To "Patrick from Cincinnati":

For instance, while you've engaged in stalking behavior, I don't think it's yet risen to the level prohibited by statute.

Do you have any prove of me engaging in anything that can even remotely be characterized as "stalking behavior"? I doubt that.

Hence you are either delusional or lying. That is hardly surprising, though, given your propensity to protect the "big lie" here.

 
At 09 February, 2010 11:39, Anonymous GuitarBill said...

Triterope writes, "...And if the 9-11 Truth movement would follow that advice, the world would be a better place."

The 911 "truth" movement--if we're ever arrested, we sure hope the prosecutor doesn't use our standard's of evidence.

%^)

 
At 09 February, 2010 13:04, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris Epstein,

I gave you a wrong last name, not thinking that there was a lawyer in Rochester, NY, with that name, and damn, there actually was such a person. And you harassed the person.

Proof? I don't care about proof in this context. I could dig up what I can, but I don't see the point. We all know you're a nut.

What did you accomplish in your time away from here?

And how did that Northeast Troof Conference go? 8 speakers and 4 participants? Describe.

 
At 09 February, 2010 13:22, Anonymous ConsDemo said...

Boris Epstein said...I guess the qualification I should've made was that the legal system be functional. In regards to 9/11 it is clearly not...

They're not "functional" because they aren't interested in dishonest and stupid conspiracy theories from a moron such as yourself? Sounds like they are functioning quite correctly!

Btw, if you believe that, why bother with the "we want a new investigation" bs, since that would require "functional" law enforcement?

It was always a phony demand by the twoofers but now that you've admitted it is pointless what will losers such as yourself do to satisfy your paranoid delusions and anti-Americanism?

 
At 09 February, 2010 13:27, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think the version you cite was filed, and I note that blogger has 404'd it.

Here's the cache of the blogger doc: http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:gSyd5BdBj-4J:www.911blogger.com/node/22533+affidavit+robin+hordon&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Here's the Bill Veale edited version:
http://www.centerfor911justice.org/news/Filed=20Affidavit=20Hordon.pdf

 
At 09 February, 2010 14:43, Blogger Triterope said...

the legal system be functional. In regards to 9/11 it is clearly not

Would that be the same legal system April Gallop and Robin Hordon are appealing to with this lawsuit? Idiot.

 
At 09 February, 2010 14:48, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

To Triterope:

Would that be the same legal system April Gallop and Robin Hordon are appealing to with this lawsuit? Idiot.

Yes, it would be. It has thus far failed to properly investigate 9/11 as a crime. And, in fact, it is in this case only April Gallop who is "appealing" to the system - Hordon is just a witness in the case.

 
At 09 February, 2010 15:00, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Yes, it would be. It has thus far failed to properly investigate 9/11 as a crime."

That'd be because it wasn't a "crime", it was an act of war commited by al Queda against America.

You retarded marmoset.

 
At 09 February, 2010 15:34, Anonymous NoIdentity said...

If you push them hard enough they will admit that they think the entire legal system is corrupt and pointless. They don't want a new investigation; They want a revolution against the Illuminati/NWO/Shape-shifting-lizards.

 
At 09 February, 2010 15:53, Blogger Triterope said...

Once again, Borat misses the point completely.

 
At 09 February, 2010 16:43, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"address racial crimes against the Blacks"

WOW!
Comparing the REAL crimes against blacks to the imaginary crimes in the heads of a bunch of delusional kooks.

 
At 09 February, 2010 20:51, Anonymous NoIdentity said...

http://www.cracked.com/article_17469_5-pathetic-groups-that-people-think-rule-world.html

This is really funny. I just stumbled upon it and though I'd share it.

 
At 10 February, 2010 00:32, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

Patrick from Cincinnati,

Please see my response to your last comment below.

I gave you a wrong last name, not thinking that there was a lawyer in Rochester, NY, with that name, and damn, there actually was such a person. And you harassed the person.

You mean, most likely, that after I asked you to introduce yourself you provided an incorrect name. The reason I called on you to introduce yourself was, most likely, that you were insulting people anonymously. Yes, I am of the opinion that doing so is cowardly, and yes, I do often point it to those who engage in such a practice. Otherwise I rarely have a problem with people desiring to stay anonymous.

But be that as it may - I do give you credit for being honest enough to admit that you had lied. However, be that as it may, even if the name you gave me happens to be that of a Rochester, NY attorney it is not true that I attempted - or even intended to attempt - to contact that person in any way, form or shape.

It must also be mentioned that the fact that you did lie hardly comes as a surprise - it often takes a liar to support the obviously false official conspiracy theory of 9/11.

Proof? I don't care about proof in this context. I could dig up what I can, but I don't see the point. We all know you're a nut.

Is there any context in which you do care about proof or facts of the matter? If there is I have yet to see it.

If you believe you could dig something up feel free to do so; if not, admit you can't. Or do you simply not "see the point"? Well, am I correct in understanding that reality does not matter to you when it is not what you want to see? Well, that does make you delusional. So perhaps I should not characterize you as a liar, perhaps you simply don't see the difference between truth and fiction. That could also be consistent with your overall behaviour.

I must also say that your perceptions are curious to say the least. But I will let you in on a little secret. You see, in the real life most people meet lots of people. They happen to learn lots of names, phone numbers, mail addresses, email addresses. Do you believe they learn that exclusively for the purpose of harassment? Or do you simply believe I harass everyone whose contact information I ever acquire? Or do you just throw out infantile insults in an equally infantile hope that they would have some effect?

What did you accomplish in your time away from here?

Not that my life is any of your business... But I am not a secretive person so I'd be happy to answer a question if it made sense. This one I am having a bit of trouble understanding. What do you mean by "in your time away from here"? Away from where? I actually haven't traveled that much lately...

And how did that Northeast Troof Conference go? 8 speakers and 4 participants? Describe.

Not sure what you are referring to. How is that related to the topic at hand?

 
At 10 February, 2010 01:59, Blogger 簡單生活 said...

Birthdays are good for you. The more you have, the longer you live.............................................

 
At 10 February, 2010 06:16, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"What did you accomplish in your time away from here?

Not that my life is any of your business... But I am not a secretive person so I'd be happy to answer a question if it made sense. This one I am having a bit of trouble understanding. What do you mean by "in your time away from here"?"

He's refering to the fact that you weren't posting here while you were in that, ummmm, "home".

 
At 10 February, 2010 07:21, Blogger petrenkov said...

Pretty interesting blog you've got here. Thanks for it. I like such themes and anything that is connected to this matter. I would like to read a bit more soon.

Best regards
Jeph Normic

 
At 10 February, 2010 10:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Off topic, but interesting: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iKQtvU9zRF95RLI-rjN-hQxQJ-bgD9DPD70O1

Newly released aerial photos of the Sept. 11, 2001, World Trade Center attack show the towers coming down from a dramatic new angle.

The photos were obtained by ABC News, which filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the National Institute of Standards and Technology last year. The NIST collected the images as part of its investigation into the terrorist attack.

ABC said it was provided 2,779 pictures on nine CDs. Many of the photos, taken from police helicopters, have never been released before.

Twelve of the photos appear on ABC's Web site. One photo shows a close-up of the upper floors of the burning towers. Others show the towers' dramatic collapse in a thick plume of smoke and debris and sweeping views of billowing smoke clouds.

 
At 10 February, 2010 11:32, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, Pat! I know of your love of Leo Wanta stories. Well, here's a guy training to be a mini-Wanta: http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/

Also, while struggling to remember Wanta's name I found his wiki page. Hilarious! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Wanta

-manny

 
At 10 February, 2010 11:37, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Duh. Corrected link: http://www.ajc.com/news/gwinnett/duluth-man-arrested-1-294562.html

 
At 10 February, 2010 11:49, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Anonymous said...
Off topic, but interesting:"

Yeah, just look at those carpets smolder!


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/slideshow/ALeqM5iKQtvU9zRF95RLI-rjN-hQxQJ-bgD9DPD70O1?index=1

 
At 10 February, 2010 12:26, Anonymous NoIdentity said...

Well, here's a guy training to be a mini-Wanta: http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
Do they really think everyone who debunks 9-11 conspiracies works for the CIA?

 
At 10 February, 2010 14:16, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heh. Sorry about that NI -- the real link is in the post below.

-manny, not a conspiracist, just a brain-farter.

 
At 10 February, 2010 15:51, Blogger Triterope said...

If you believe you could dig something up feel free to do so; if not, admit you can't.

Nobody has to "dig up" anything, Borat. We were all here when it happened. Do you realize you're trying to convince us that things we personally observed didn't happen? You're a living, breathing example of doink doink doink.

(And if any of you aren't familiar with the "doink doink doink" post, read it now. It's one of the most insightful things ever written about 9-11 Truthers.)

 
At 10 February, 2010 16:02, Anonymous NoIdentity said...

Manny
Ah I suspected as much. But I'm a smartass and couldn't help myself! Interesting link! This Leo Wanta character is interesting. The chaos of Russia in the 90s has always fascinated me.

 
At 10 February, 2010 16:26, Blogger Triterope said...

Update: In typical troofer fashion, the post to which I linked on 911 Blogger has been removed without explanation.

That's just mystifying. A meaningless legal document filed by a Truther with overstated credentials is one of the proudest moments the Truth movement gets to experience. And there's nothing in the content of the letter that would offend 911Blogger's general editorial slant.

You know what I think? I think somebody over 911Blackguard noticed Brian Good's post here accusing Hordon of anti-Semitic remarks, and they're now trying to distance themselves. Hey, they've responded to SLC posts before. Speculation, I grant you, but why else would they memory-hole something they'd normally be so proud of?

 
At 10 February, 2010 17:06, Anonymous paul w said...

Triterope said...
"A meaningless legal document filed by a Truther with overstated credentials is one of the proudest moments the Truth movement gets to experience..."


Damn! I missed it!!!

Bastard!!!!

 
At 10 February, 2010 17:15, Anonymous NoIdentity said...

You guys need to stop outing antisemites in the truth movement.
[cue Walt's entry to exclaim that only a few of the millions of truthers are antisemites]

 
At 10 February, 2010 17:17, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Boris, how did the Northeast 9/11 Truth Conference work out for you, you disgusting stalker? Apparently it was supposed to happen on Jan. 31, and you promoted it on your website. Did more than two people show up?

 
At 10 February, 2010 18:14, Blogger James B. said...

I was actually the one who did all the Wanta stories. Everyone always gets us confused...

 
At 10 February, 2010 20:06, Blogger Boris Epstein said...

Patrick from Cincinnati,

Boris, how did the Northeast 9/11 Truth Conference work out for you, you disgusting stalker? Apparently it was supposed to happen on Jan. 31, and you promoted it on your website. Did more than two people show up?

Normally I would be disinclined to even dignify so disrespectful a tirade with an answer but given that you at least demonstrated the courage to admit to your lies I will make an exception for you this one time. I will also use this as an opportunity - a final one - to provide proof to your allegations of stalking behaviour on my part. If such proof is not forthcoming I think any reasonable person would conclude that you never had it in any form to begin with and that your allegations are nothing but outright slander.

Now back to your question. I was sick on the weekend on January 30-31 so I couldn't make it to the conference. From what I heard it went well. And there were a lot more than than attendees - I think the crowd varied from between several dozen of people to over a hundred. You can search the web for detailed reports on the event.

 
At 10 February, 2010 20:20, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Normally I would be disinclined to even dignify so disrespectful a tirade with an answer but given that you at least demonstrated the courage to admit to your lies I will make an exception for you this one time. I will also use this as an opportunity - a final one - to provide proof to your allegations of stalking behaviour on my part. If such proof is not forthcoming I think any reasonable person would conclude that you never had it in any form to begin with and that your allegations are nothing but outright slander.

This is good stuff: Brian Good level megalomania is always entertaining, Mr. Epstein.

And there were a lot more than than attendees - I think the crowd varied from between several dozen of people to over a hundred.

So in other words, your high end estimate is about 1/10th the number of people who attended the thrilling Penn-Brown basketball game in Providence that same weekend. What a success!

 
At 10 February, 2010 22:47, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well damn, James, I'm sorry. I searched for the "Wanta" tag and just took the author of the most recent one. I should have gone back further but blame your cohort for stealing your well-deserved Wanta thunder!

-manny

 
At 10 February, 2010 23:22, Anonymous NoIdentity said...

You have to go to his Chief blog. There's lots of Wanta stuff there.

 
At 10 February, 2010 23:36, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

James Bennet:

"Update: In typical troofer fashion, the post to which I linked on 911 Blogger has been removed without explanation. Destroy the evidence."

Not necessarily. When a blog post is updated, (Somebody, say Robin Hordon, modifies something and clicks "submit") it returns back into the moderation queue. After approval it appears again. It may appear again soon.

If they deleted it entirely, I'd be surprised. It's possible.

 
At 10 February, 2010 23:37, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

In other words: ease down on the conspiracy theories, James :P

 
At 10 February, 2010 23:52, Blogger bjorn said...

RR,
See my comments on "With Savvy Investigators Like These... "
Danke schon.

 
At 11 February, 2010 00:12, Blogger bjorn said...

Come on RR, you can't possibly be in the same bloody time zone I'm in, can you?

 
At 11 February, 2010 03:18, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

Who knows. All I know is that I'm not in the same time zone as Lazarus Long

I quote: "Lazarus snatches his mother out of the time stream at the end of her life and replaces her with a dead clone."

ROFLMFAO! ! ! !!!11

 
At 11 February, 2010 06:03, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

" Roid Rage said...
Who knows. All I know is that I'm not in the same time zone as Lazarus Long

I quote: "Lazarus snatches his mother out of the time stream at the end of her life and replaces her with a dead clone.""

You're becoming an obsessive moron.

Must be all the marks from the Clue-By-four™ on you lil pumpkin head.

LOL!

 
At 11 February, 2010 06:41, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

"Must be all the marks from the Clue-By-four™ on you lil pumpkin head."

Oh noze! Not the clue bat! What will I do now, in the face of master debunker Lazarus Long, feared and respected by....

...


...


...

 
At 11 February, 2010 07:43, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

Actually, you conspiritard, it's up to you to prove your insane conspiracy "theories".

Which you can't do.

So I sit here and laugh and laugh at your useless thrasing.

 
At 11 February, 2010 08:17, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

"Actually, you conspiritard, it's up to you to prove your insane conspiracy "theories".

Which you can't do.

So I sit here and laugh and laugh at your useless thrasing."

That makes two of us =) I'm still laughing about that "wind blowing in the microphone" bungle! Your helpless fumbling and blundering is hysterical! =)

Me, I think it's an absolute misdemeanor to withhold your side-splitting antics from the public! Have you considered becoming the full-time bloopering street clown you were born to be?

 
At 11 February, 2010 09:46, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"That makes two of us =) I'm still laughing about that "wind blowing in the microphone" bungle"

You actually believe that the sound of wind blowing across a mike is actually the sound of "explosions"?

You really are crazy.

 
At 11 February, 2010 15:22, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Somebody inform the insane, all capsnutbar PornBoy that all the firemen and rescue personnel who heard explosions at the site weren't listening through a microphone.Turns out Ron the Pornboy is actually dumber than Ronbo the Death Squad President Who Flooded America With Marching Powder and presided over scores of massacres in Central America.And that ain't easy!

 
At 11 February, 2010 16:49, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

"You actually believe that the sound of wind blowing across a mike is actually the sound of "explosions"?

You really are crazy."

Yep, that's one hell of a wind blowing, especially when it comes down. Like that hot air coming from your mouth. =)

Like I said, you're a legendary moron. You need your own traveling freak show, chucklefuck.

 
At 11 February, 2010 16:52, Blogger Triterope said...

When a (911Blogger) blog post is updated, it returns back into the moderation queue. After approval it appears again. It may appear again soon.

The post in question has been gone over 24 hours now, and apparently they've had time to approve more recent posts.

 
At 11 February, 2010 17:42, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

"The post in question has been gone over 24 hours now, and apparently they've had time to approve more recent posts."

24 hours is not an unusually long time, considering the overload on 911blogger moderators. But maybe they did censor it, Triterope. It is starting to look that way.

 
At 11 February, 2010 18:19, Blogger Triterope said...

Maybe they did censor it. It is starting to look that way.

Again, why? What was so wrong with the story that it had to be removed? I really can't imagine.

 
At 11 February, 2010 18:35, Anonymous Roid Rage said...

"Again, why? What was so wrong with the story that it had to be removed? I really can't imagine."

That crap about Burlingame, for one, but no need to reiterate what SLC has summed up succinctly.

 
At 13 February, 2010 08:38, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

By the way,Ron the PornBoyo,where's your artful deflection of the white flash explosions as the North Tower is demolished as captured by Rick Siegel's camera from Hoboken,N.J. that fateful day? Surely you must have gotten a hold of a DVD copy of this devastating document by now.Your silence on this speaks volumes,in case you weren't aware of it.

 
At 13 February, 2010 14:11, Anonymous Roman Queeg said...

"white flash explosions"

Your stupidity on this speaks volumes,in case you weren't aware of it.

 
At 13 February, 2010 17:04, Blogger Triterope said...

That crap about Burlingame, for one

There's plenty of posts over there that say the same crap:

His sister Debra Burlingame described him as "a guy that's been through SERE [Survival Evasion Resistance Escape] school in the Navy and had very tough psychological and physical preparation." She said, "If there was any chance of saving [Flight 77], this was the kind of guy who would have been able to do that."

 
At 15 February, 2010 10:43, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

So what are those white flashes in the core of the Tower as it crumbles,Captain Queeg? You've examined the footage,you've analyzed the evidence,so what are those flashes?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home