There Is No End to the Rabbit Hole
The latest paranoia from the nutbars? 9-11 Blogger is working for the "other" side (presumably the government). It's South Park's parody come to life.
In part because of this decision by 911blogger, to reject Barrie Zwicker’s endorsement of CIT while publishing a childish hit piece from an anonymous source, Southern California 9/11 truth activist and We Are Change LA member Adam Ruff wrote:
“In my view it is now 100% confirmed that 911blogger is an enemy of the truth
movement as a whole and is engaged in an open campaign of attack on good
truthers.”
No, Flogger is not on "our" side. I checked the budget and we don't have a line item for them. But I do find the incident amusing. The "Truthers" bitterly complain about Lefty Gatekeepers like Kos and Democratic Underground not allowing their topic to be discussed, but why do those sites do so? Because they don't want to be associated with a bunch of lunatics. Why does 9-11 Blogger ban promotion of CIT's junk? You guessed it.
As always, the real humor is in the comments.
posted by Pat @ 8:55 AM
8 comments
8 Comments:
Democratic Underground sure allows discussion of 9/11 "truth", or at least did. If they didn't, we wouldn't have Brian Good's amazing "meatball on a fork" and "rake on rake" scribbles.
Ian, true, but they restrict it to one section of the site and no posts there are allowed to be promoted to the "best" page.
Ian, you forgot the all-time classic: Spooked's rabbit-cage.
I liked 911Blogger's Freudian slip:
"The 9/11 Truth movement is probably the loosest political campaign in history,..."
Political campaign??
Gosh, I thought it was all about "finding the truth".
Fetzer wrote:
"My own personal experience with 911blogger confirms the view that it has long been operating to suppress dissenting opinions from its own narrow-minded take on 9/11. I was given the boot years ago for raising questions about the thermite theory of Steven E. Jones, which I do not believe can account for the conversional of the Twin Towers into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust"
http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=26737&postcount=6
At least he didn't directly accuse them of being CIA.
The original article seems to have been taken down.
My own personal experience with 911blogger confirms the view that it has long been operating to suppress dissenting opinions from its own narrow-minded take on 9/11
"Narrow-minded take"?
Not to stick up for 911Blogger or anything, but an alternative explanation of an event should be narrow-minded. If the events didn't happen as we all believe, then they happened some other way -- only one other way.
That Fetzer thinks narrow-mindedness is a bad thing in a purported crime investigation betrays fuzzy-headed thinking on his part.
These are my thoughts exactly. I have been encouraged by the things you said in this. I can seriously say things look a lot better now.Having a look Nike shox. Good things or not you have the final say.
These are my thoughts exactly. I have been encouraged by the things you said in this. I can seriously say things look a lot better now.Having a look Nike shox. Good things or not you have the final say.
Post a Comment
<< Home