Thursday, May 05, 2011

Hilariously Bad Truther Cultural Analysis

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, after all these were the brainiacs who argued that Muslims are not allowed to wear jewelry and were confused as to why Osama bin Laden would be writing with his right hand. But here it is from a 911 Flogger comment on Osama's recent demise.

If the Bin Laden Lynching Raid at the "mansion" was staged, we need to figure out who the "wife" and kids really were.
Have there been any DNA tests on the kids? Will there be?
Probably not, to keep them in custody and "protect them" from the lime light. So they have a plausible reason for not letting anyone independently verify who they were. We just have to accept their story.
What mother would want herself and her kids to be around:
* the most wanted man on Earth, who was in constant danger of just such an attack?
* What wife would want to sleep with a man twice her age? .
* What wife would want to share him with other wives and sleep with him once a week?


Well evidently she didn't get her latest issue of Ms. magazine!

12 Comments:

At 06 May, 2011 00:57, Blogger Fleet Commander said...

I'm leaving this here because the post i want to comment on:

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2009/04/bentham-editor-resigns-over-steven.html

doesn't seem to have a comment link. That post is nonsense. Some nutjob woman editor feels miffed, so you think that discredits the paper..? Politics are rampant in academic departments and in publishing. I'm glad she's gone. Whatever.

I've read that paper by Harrit, Jones, et al.--twice--and it's very good. Your only hope of attacking it is to question the provenance of the dust they analyzed. Good luck.

 
At 06 May, 2011 02:11, Blogger Garry said...

'I've read that paper by Harrit, Jones, et al.--twice--and it's very good'.

Are you a structural or civil engineer? A physicist? A professional architect? A chemist? Do you have any qualifications that helps you judge the paper? Or are you just another wackjob.

'Your only hope of attacking it is to question the provenance of the dust they analyzed'.

Which hasn't been made available to non-troofers.

'Politics are rampant in academic departments and in publishing'.

In proper academic journals you don't have to pay to get your research published, and peer review is done anonymously by referees you cannot nominate. This is why 'troofers' can only publish in bogus journals rather than properly accredited ones.

 
At 06 May, 2011 02:13, Blogger Garry said...

Talking of troofers and cultural awareness, I still remember that cretin on 9/11 Flogger who said that he thought Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was a good guy, and he'd happily buy the Iranian President a beer.

 
At 06 May, 2011 02:40, Blogger Richard Gage's Testicles said...

doesn't seem to have a comment link.

Posts beyond a certain age don't have comment links. That one's 2 years old.

I've read that paper by Harrit, Jones, et al.--twice--and it's very good.

Glad you enjoyed it. Why do you suppose its findings have been rejected by legitimate science?

 
At 06 May, 2011 06:25, Blogger Arcterus said...

Oh wow, that IS bad. My favorites are:

The wife who was shot, reports when sleeping with Bin Laden she still felt alone, so the love making was not even good.

Bin Laden kids never went out to play with neighbor kids?

And my absolute top pick:

They were happy, with no internet?

Even when I was a truther, this would have been hilarious.

Oh, and FC, here's a cool video for you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXvUt2NE7ro

 
At 06 May, 2011 07:27, Blogger Nonspiracy said...

Somebody's got some 'splaining to do in the Troofer nutosphere...

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-confirms-bin-laden-death-monitoring-group-122049286.html

"Al Qaeda confirmed the death of Osama bin Laden on Friday in an Internet message that vowed revenge on the United States and its allies"

"In a historic day for the great Islamic nation... the mujahid (holy warrior) Shiekh Abu Abdullah, Osama bin Mohammed bin Laden, God have mercy on him, was killed on the path taken by those before him and will be taken by others after him."

For once I am in 100% agreement with Al Qaeda... "a historic day" for sure!! I'm sure Kevin Barret will have some psycho "Mossad" connection to this.

 
At 06 May, 2011 09:24, Blogger roo said...

I would love to see a truther take a class in anthropology. They would argue every concept that doesn't happen in their world.

 
At 06 May, 2011 09:49, Blogger Arcterus said...

But Al Qaeda is just some fake organization created by the government...or something.

In the end, it will be inconsequential.

 
At 06 May, 2011 09:56, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

Dear Commander,

That nutjob woman has been a professor in multiple respected universities. However, don;t forget to mention she is 1 of 5 people who resigned from Bentham due to their BS & 1 of 2 editors of that journal who resigned for the same.

 
At 06 May, 2011 14:17, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

My "Deather" Bingo is just writing itself.

 
At 06 May, 2011 23:17, Blogger Steve said...

Ah yes, the comedy gold of TruthMakesPeace. Here's some more gems of his from a thread over at JREF about bin Laden being killed:

"Sharp shooters who could shoot a dime, could not shoot his gun hand?"

and

"Probably they could shoot down the barrel of Bin Laden's gun, rendering it harmless."

and

"If you don't think JSOC could hit Bin Laden's hands, how about his kidney dialysis machine?"

and last but not least, he suggested that the SEALs just wait him out-

"He was surrounded, and will eventually run out of ammo, or need a kidney dialysis."

 
At 07 May, 2011 05:41, Blogger Highland Host said...

Do these people not realise that polygamy is NORMAL in Islamic societies? No, of course not. Or that women frequently marry older men? Or, indeed, that is Al-Quaeda circles bin Laden was a hero?

No, of course not. That would require an understanding of the real world.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home