Thursday, June 16, 2011

Are They Trying to Lose This Case?

When we last covered the issue of April Gallop's lawsuit against Cheney et al, SPC Gallop was getting her case thrown out of the appeals court, along with a request to explain why she should not have to pay $15,000 for a frivolous lawsuit. Now it appears though, rather than doing so, she is doubling down by demanding that the court hear the appeal to her appeal.

Now I, of course, am not one to believe in conspiracy theories, but having read this latest filing, provided here courtesy of LashL, the Goddess of Legaltainment (TM), I find myself asking, "Are they trying to lose this case?" The filing is bad. Idiotically bad. Mind-numbingly bad. I am not a truther, but even I could put together a better legal argument against Dick Cheney than this. I would be willing to bet that any half competent code monkey could write a PERL script to jumble together random sentences from Truther websites that would make more sense than this awful dreck.

For example, this one sentence.


The Panel also ignored the complex web of concrete information in the Complaint relating to the alleged route of the plane, including the wholly improbable 8000-foot spiral dive it took, bypassing the major targets presented by the top of the building, and the West face where Rumsfeld &Co. had their offices, to come at the obscure back of the building (where the financial records were kept) (Complaint, ¶ 38); the “black box” and other flight path anomalies, and the conflict with the Commission‟s computer simulation (Complaint, ¶2); the contradictory statements by Rumsfeld about the damage, and about his whereabouts and movements that morning (Id, ¶¶ 45); and myriad other details casting doubt on the official account.


This is just one sentence, albeit a rather long and rambling one punctuated with the overuse of semicolons, but I count at least 5 logical and factual errors in that sentence alone. Maybe I am missing some. I did read it rather quickly. Anyone want to check my work?

And even I, jaded as I have become after years of this, was shocked to see this claim:

Examples include evidence, including video evidence, of secondary explosions at the Pentagon; evidence showing that radar records of the Pentagon plane were tampered with; evidence showing a pattern of destruction and damage in the area of plaintiff‟s Pentagon office impossible to reconcile with a plane crash, and showing that parts from a small military plane, an “A-3 Skywarrior” were found in the Pentagon ruins.

An A-3 Skywarrior? Really? Even the Loose Change guys gave that up, like, 4 versions ago. Is International Man of Mystery Karl Schwarz going to be called back from running his nanotech company in Vienna to act as an expert witness?

Labels:

58 Comments:

At 16 June, 2011 20:39, Blogger Triterope said...

You know, most people get the message after their first $15,000 in sanctions. Idiots.

 
At 16 June, 2011 21:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

The history of 9/11 lawsuits (Stanley Hilton's, Philip Berg's, the qui tams) has been so embarrassing that you have to wonder if they were designed to be discrediting.

 
At 16 June, 2011 21:54, Blogger roo said...

Yes Brian, you and you alone are the person with the guts to flush out the truths of the world. Everyone else is trying to discredit your efforts.

 
At 17 June, 2011 08:34, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Clinton had Whitewater, Vince Foster, Mena, etc. Bushit had 9/11 troof. Obama has the birthers.

Hmmmmmmmmm...

And now this...

"...The birther movement is back with a new conspiracy that states not only was Barack Obama not born in America, but that the whole birther movement is a creation of Obama and the Left, in order to make the right look crazy. Both Tom Tancredo and Glenn Beck have embraced this conspiracy within a conspiracy that, in essence blames the entire birther movement on Obama and the Left."

http://www.politicususa.com/en/birthers-blame-obama

Got it?

%^)

 
At 17 June, 2011 11:43, Blogger Pat said...

It's true that the Birther nonsense started with a few liberal supporters of Hillary (Larry Johnson of No Quarter and Phil Berg). But that doesn't excuse the dolts on the right who adopted it as their own, like Corsi and Farah.

 
At 17 June, 2011 14:03, Blogger snug.bug said...

If the birther movement wasn't the creation of the Secret Service it should have been. A lot of nutjobs could not accept the idea of a black man in the White House. The birther movement gave them the chance to direct their energy in a more socially acceptable direction through the legal processes, and the chance to identify and isolate those whose emotions were likely to boil over into violence.

 
At 17 June, 2011 14:25, Blogger Ian said...

The history of 9/11 lawsuits (Stanley Hilton's, Philip Berg's, the qui tams) has been so embarrassing that you have to wonder if they were designed to be discrediting.

No, they're just absurd, just like everything and everybody in the truth movement.

Brian, if anyone in the truth movement was a plant to discredit the movement, it would be you: a cross-dressing unemployed janitor who has harassed and stalked pretty much every significant member of the movement and who runs away when said members issue debate challenges.

 
At 17 June, 2011 14:28, Blogger Ian said...

If the birther movement wasn't the creation of the Secret Service it should have been.

It wasn't. It was a creation of lunatics, just like 9/11 truth was a creation of lunatics.

A lot of nutjobs could not accept the idea of a black man in the White House.

Right, just like a lot of nutjobs couldn't accept the idea of George W. Bush in the White House, so they tried to de-legitimize his administration by blaming the attacks on him.

I'm saying this as someone who thinks the Bush administration was one of the worst in American history.

The birther movement gave them the chance to direct their energy in a more socially acceptable direction through the legal processes, and the chance to identify and isolate those whose emotions were likely to boil over into violence.

Um, what?

 
At 17 June, 2011 15:14, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Ian wrote, "...Brian, if anyone in the truth movement was a plant to discredit the movement, it would be you: a cross-dressing unemployed janitor who has harassed and stalked pretty much every significant member of the movement and who runs away when said members issue debate challenges."

Yep, there's no better way to discredit a "movement" than to show up at the protests in women's underwear.

And then there's the issue of admitting, in a public forum, that your goal is to spread propaganda in service to the same [cough] "movement."

"...I think I'll stick to diplomacy, propaganda, and civil confrontation, thank you. It seems to have worked in isolating Barrett and Ranke." -- Brian "goat fucker" Good posting under his latest sock puppet handle, "truebeleaguer."

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7149&start=30

Beyond parody.

 
At 17 June, 2011 18:36, Blogger Triterope said...

"Are They Trying to Lose This Case?"

It should be pointed out that they've already lost this case. Or more precisely, that the case was ruled too stupid to exist. Twice.

 
At 17 June, 2011 19:52, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"If the birther movement wasn't the creation of the Secret Service it should have been."

This is comedy gold. So tell us, Brian, how has the Secret Service benifited from the "Birthers"?

 
At 18 June, 2011 17:14, Blogger snug.bug said...

MGF, did your lips get too tired to read my entire post? I explained in it exactly how the Secret Service benefited from the "Birthers".

 
At 18 June, 2011 18:13, Blogger Ian said...

MGF, did your lips get too tired to read my entire post? I explained in it exactly how the Secret Service benefited from the "Birthers".

No you didn't, you just posted a bunch of incoherent nonsense about the birthers.

 
At 18 June, 2011 18:18, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"A lot of nutjobs could not accept the idea of a black man in the White House. The birther movement gave them the chance to direct their energy in a more socially acceptable direction through the legal processes, and the chance to identify and isolate those whose emotions were likely to boil over into violence."

Not sure how any of this is a benifit. I'm definately sure it is in no way accurate. I hope it is though, it means that the Secret Service has a huge file on you.

 
At 19 June, 2011 00:12, Blogger sabba said...

M Gregory Ferris said...Not sure how any of this is a benifit. I'm definately sure it is in no way accurate. I hope it is though, it means that the Secret Service has a huge file on you.

I made no excuse that I reported Brian Good to the FBI as a potential Terrorist waiting to explode. I am SURE there is a file on him there. Do not know about the Secret Service, but since nowadays all the agencies are cooperating, they may share the same file.

 
At 19 June, 2011 10:38, Blogger snug.bug said...

MGF, if you can't recognize that the birther movement would tend to attract, allow identification of, and neutralize those whose racist rage might make them a danger to the president, that's your own problem.

sabba, you are only trying in your own inept way to intimidate and discredit. I have very good relations with the police everywhere I go. They recognize that I am aware of my rights and will not interfere with the rights of others, and they leave me alone.

Willie R stole the story of a true 9/11 hero, Pablo Ortiz. Willie's toast.

 
At 19 June, 2011 11:36, Blogger Ian said...

MGF, if you can't recognize that the birther movement would tend to attract, allow identification of, and neutralize those whose racist rage might make them a danger to the president, that's your own problem.

Actually, it's your problem, Brian. It's more evidence that you're a deranged, paranoid lunatic if you think the Secret Service has anything to do with the birthers.

 
At 19 June, 2011 13:43, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I didn't say the Secret Service had anything to do with the birthers. It's too bad that your arrogance prevents you from being embarrassed by your ignorance.

 
At 19 June, 2011 14:17, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I didn't say the Secret Service had anything to do with the birthers.

No, you just speculate idly, which allows you to backtrack and deny when other people laugh at you and call you out for your clearly insane thoughts. You know, like this:

If the birther movement wasn't the creation of the Secret Service it should have been.

No, no suggestion that the Secret Service had anything to do with the birthers there!

It's too bad that your arrogance prevents you from being embarrassed by your ignorance.

Squeal squeal squeal!

 
At 19 June, 2011 19:11, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"They recognize that I am aware of my rights and will not interfere with the rights of others"

People have a right not to be stalked and sexually harassed.

People have a right to share their 9/11 stories without being called a liar.

"
MGF, if you can't recognize that the birther movement would tend to attract, allow identification of, and neutralize those whose racist rage might make them a danger to the president, that's your own problem."


You need to spend time at a mental health clinic, and not just for the obvious reasons. Not every threat to the President is a birther. The most dangerous threat is the lone gunman. Always has been always will be. The Secret Service has a vast division that tracks down threats, assesses potential threats, and watches the real dangerous ones. They didn't need the birthers any more than they needed to troofers (who have a large body-count BTW)to focus in on threats to Bush.

Why can't you just shut up once in a while?

 
At 19 June, 2011 20:33, Blogger paul w said...

Why can't you just shut up once in a while?

Talk to his doctor.

 
At 19 June, 2011 21:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

MGF, I didn't stalk or sexually harass anybody, and Barrett and Willie and Ian are the only ones who say I did.

People have a right to share their stories. People don't have a right to steal other people's stories for the purposes of inducing audiences to give them money. That's called fraud. For the rest of his life William Rodriguez will have to live with the fact that he's a common criminal.

Your belief that the birther movement represented a threat to Bush is a real hoot.

 
At 19 June, 2011 21:20, Blogger Triterope said...

Willie R stole the story of a true 9/11 hero, Pablo Ortiz. Willie's toast.

Looks like the mods have some deleting to do.

 
At 19 June, 2011 21:30, Blogger snug.bug said...

Yeah, right. Youse guys can post any kind of nonsense that you want, but when I want to correct you it's off topic.

 
At 19 June, 2011 22:01, Blogger paul w said...

Squeal squeal squeal!*





*Copyright: Ian, and a cast of thousands.

 
At 19 June, 2011 23:32, Blogger snug.bug said...

Yeah, those girls sure are noisy when they're getting reamed.

 
At 20 June, 2011 07:52, Blogger Triterope said...

Yeah, right. Youse guys can post any kind of nonsense that you want, but when I want to correct you it's off topic.

Yeah, right. The only "correcting" you're doing is to make sure that at all times the thread topic is DURR KEVIN BARRETT DURR WILLIE RODRIGUEZ WON'T DEBATE ME DURR CAROL BROUILLET'S RADIO SHOW DURR WIDOWS DURR UNANSWERED QUESTIONS DURRRRRRRRRRRRR.

Which is really your only interest in 9-11 at all. You became a Truther because you thought it was a good place to get laid. You only hate Kevin Barrett and Willie Rodriguez because you think they cockblocked you.

It is obvious you cannot abide by the terms of the semi-ban. Or any other basic behavior rule of decent society.

Ban. For good this time. If that can't be done, then delete all his posts. I'd be more than happy to help.

 
At 20 June, 2011 09:17, Blogger snug.bug said...

TR, Kevin Barrett and Willie R don't have the power to cockblock anybody. Not even with Ian's help.

 
At 20 June, 2011 13:16, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

Yeah, right. Youse guys can post any kind of nonsense that you want, but when I want to correct you it's off topic.

That's because we use our brains to think about stuff, you're quite the opposite of us, you don't think at all which is why most of what you say is off topic anyways.

 
At 20 June, 2011 17:22, Blogger Ian said...

Yeah, those girls sure are noisy when they're getting reamed.

Ah, Brian calling us "girls" again. That never gets old.

Hey Brian, did the widows have their questions answered today? I forgot to check.

 
At 20 June, 2011 17:24, Blogger Ian said...

TR, Kevin Barrett and Willie R don't have the power to cockblock anybody. Not even with Ian's help.

It's hilarious how much I piss Brian off. I guess it must hurt to have someone half your age mock you every day for being a total failure in all areas of life. Brian couldn't even remain a truther in good standing, and the truth movement keeps people like Bill Deagle and Judy Wood around!

 
At 20 June, 2011 18:34, Blogger Triterope said...

TR, Kevin Barrett and Willie R don't have the power to cockblock anybody. Not even with Ian's help.

Who the fuck do you think you're kidding, Brian? Barrett wrote a nasty page about your behavior, and Rodriguez has the friendship with Carol Brouillet you so desperately want for yourself. That's why you hate those two so much. It's so obvious.

 
At 20 June, 2011 23:44, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I see no evidence that the truth movement keeps Deagle and Wood around. I am not aware that they have ever appeared at truth movement conferences except perhaps, in Dr. Wood's case, in Seattle several years ago.


TR, Barrett didn't write about my behavior--he wrote about his fantasies about my behavior.

Barrett is nobody. He just did a tour in Germany. Google << "Kevin Barrett" Germany>> for news and for blogs. Nada. Zilch. When he appeared in London last year less than 200 came to see him in a 1000-seat hall. And that's in a country where anti-semitism is much more socially acceptable than it is in this country.

If Rodriguez had the friendship of Carol Brouillet then you would expect that she would be very anxious to host a debate that she could then edit to remove my points and maximize damage to me. And yet according to Willie she's not willing to do that. Why?

I don't hate Willie or Carol. I pity Willie. I understand that Carol found herself in a difficult position for which her life experience had not prepared her.

 
At 21 June, 2011 04:07, Blogger Triterope said...

TR, Barrett didn't write about my behavior--he wrote about his fantasies about my behavior.

Get help.

 
At 21 June, 2011 08:33, Blogger snug.bug said...

Seems like I'm the only guy around here that can distinguish between the map and the territory, and then I'm the one who's supposed to get help?

 
At 21 June, 2011 12:20, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

I'm the one who's supposed to get help?

Yes you need help you sex stalking, goat molesting pervert.

 
At 21 June, 2011 16:00, Blogger Triterope said...

Seems like I'm the only guy around here that can distinguish between the map and the territory, and then I'm the one who's supposed to get help?

What the fuck does that even mean?

GET HELP, Brian.

 
At 21 June, 2011 19:10, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I see no evidence that the truth movement keeps Deagle and Wood around. I am not aware that they have ever appeared at truth movement conferences except perhaps, in Dr. Wood's case, in Seattle several years ago.

How would you know? You've been expelled from the truth movement for being disgusting pervert and sex stalker. HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

 
At 21 June, 2011 21:39, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 21 June, 2011 21:58, Blogger snug.bug said...

TR, you not only don't know the difference between the map and the territory, you don't even know what the difference means. In the age of google there's no excuse for that.

Ian, you don't know what you're talking about. You rely for your (mis)information on sources in New Jersey and Wisconsin who are proven liars and are highly motivated to lie about me and who know nothing about conditions in California because they're afraid to come here.

 
At 22 June, 2011 13:43, Blogger Triterope said...

TR, you not only don't know the difference between the map and the territory, you don't even know what the difference means.

I know what the phrase means, you sanctimonious asshole. What I don't know is what the fuck it has to do with this conversation.

Are you saying Kevin Barrett's article is the map and your life is the territory? If so, that's a pretty poor analogy, since the purpose of a map is to accurately describe a territory.

In the age of google there's no excuse for that.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

Oh, sorry, you were serious. Let me laugh even harder.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.

Brian, one of these days you're going to have to learn that Google is not the intellectual equalizer you think it is.

 
At 22 June, 2011 18:05, Blogger Ian said...

Brian, one of these days you're going to have to learn that Google is not the intellectual equalizer you think it is.

Hey, don't knock Google. Without it, I wouldn't know that Brian is a failed janitor who wears women's underwear and who was expelled from the truth movement.

And I wouldn't know that Brian looks like an insane, homeless version of Christopher Lloyd.

 
At 22 June, 2011 18:26, Blogger paul w said...

I saw the photo of Brian in his underwear.

Google has a lot to answer for.

 
At 22 June, 2011 21:29, Blogger snug.bug said...

TR, Barrett's purpose was anything but accuracy.

There's no such thing as an intellectual equalizer and I never said there was. But google, being an endless encyclopaedia at your fingertips, means there's no longer any excuse for total ignorance.

Of course much of the information is of poor reliability, so it takes some judgment to evaluate it.
A blatant and unrepentent liar like Barrett deserves no credibility whatsoever. He has no concern for truth and doubtless considers his solipsism very learned.

 
At 22 June, 2011 22:40, Blogger paul w said...

A blatant and unrepentent liar like Barrett deserves no credibility whatsoever. He has no concern for truth and doubtless considers his solipsism very learned.

Ban

 
At 23 June, 2011 01:12, Blogger snug.bug said...

So Ian, how did your date with the sagging blob of latin manboob go? Your reluctance to report resembles Barrett's reluctance to report about his recent German lecture tour and suggests that it went about as badly.

 
At 23 June, 2011 05:55, Blogger Triterope said...

Blah blah Barrett blah blah google blah blah ignorance blah blah Barrett blah blah credibility blah blah solipsism blah blah

That's nice. Want to try answering the question this time, asshole?

 
At 23 June, 2011 11:47, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

Brian told everyone (read bolded line):

"punxsutawnebarney Says:

May 19th, 2011 at 1:49 am
of course when I was discovered to be Brian Good by willie’s fans, I got upset and attacked back. I am sad to be exposed as a liar too. Do not google “Brian Good Sex Stalker” Please!"

Taken from:

http://www.ufo-evidence.com/2011/05/hush-hush-911-inquiry-was-immoral/

 
At 23 June, 2011 11:52, Blogger sabba said...

Brian Good the gay bitch says: So Ian, how did your date with the sagging blob of latin manboob go? Your reluctance to report
The curiosity is killing you petgoat! IAN, do not report to him anything, keep him out of the loop, that will drive him crazy of jealously, His Hero meeting with his top guy here in Screwloosechange! Precious!

 
At 23 June, 2011 11:52, Blogger sabba said...

can it get any better ?

 
At 24 June, 2011 08:02, Blogger Ian said...

So Ian, how did your date with the sagging blob of latin manboob go?

Brian, I don't date men. You're the one who wears women's underwear and are obsessed with the lives of other men, remember?

Your reluctance to report resembles Barrett's reluctance to report about his recent German lecture tour and suggests that it went about as badly.

Report on what? I went to work yesterday. It was a rather mundane day.

Your obsession with the man you called a "strutting, bragging lying hunk of hot sexy manhood" is indeed disturbing.

 
At 24 June, 2011 09:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian,when did I say such a thing about that sagging blob of latin manboob?

 
At 24 June, 2011 13:00, Blogger Ian said...

Ian,when did I say such a thing about that sagging blob of latin manboob?

Many times, most recently on May 13th.

You are obsessed with him because you want a sexual relationship with him. This much is obvious.

 
At 24 June, 2011 13:14, Blogger snug.bug said...

I didn't say any such thing on May 13. You lie.

Speaking of sex with Willie, don't you think he and GutterBall would make a cute couple? They could do a 69 thing on each other's jowls.

 
At 24 June, 2011 14:24, Blogger Ian said...

I didn't say any such thing on May 13. You lie.

False.

Speaking of sex with Willie, don't you think he and GutterBall would make a cute couple? They could do a 69 thing on each other's jowls.

Brian, nobody wants to hear about your pornographic fantasies.

 
At 24 June, 2011 15:37, Blogger snug.bug said...

Nobody wants to hear about yours, either is the point. Also, yours are as boring as you are.

 
At 25 June, 2011 08:11, Blogger Ian said...

Nobody wants to hear about yours, either is the point. Also, yours are as boring as you are.

Poor Brian, all he can do is spout "I know you are but what am I?" because he knows he has lost.

 
At 25 June, 2011 16:29, Blogger Triterope said...

Poor Brian, all he can do is spout "I know you are but what am I?" because he knows he has lost.

That, and his failure to answer my very simple question about his "map and territory" analogy.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home