Luke Rudkowski At the Protests
Definitely NSFW but entertaining:
You can tell it's him when he says "I'm a ****ing journalist, you mother****ers!"
Another Troofer at the protests:
posted by Pat @ 3:14 AM
47 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Thursday, October 06, 2011
You can tell it's him when he says "I'm a ****ing journalist, you mother****ers!"
Another Troofer at the protests:
Previous Posts
- Two Days With the Truthers
- Moron Blakeney and Veteran's Today
- Truther Crime Blotter
- Thermite Simile of the Day
- The Eleventh Day
- The New Debunker on the Block
- Meet the New Boss...
- Rockets at the WTC
- Rick Rescorla Honored
- Jon Gold Took the Short Bus
View My Stats
Allies:
47 Comments:
Pat finds it 'entertaining' to watch cops beat people with sticks.
What a douche.
Yep, get me some popcorn.
Was it as entertaining to watch your father die on that slab, fatty? Did you enjoy it?
So Pat, are you sick of the troofer troll (aka the goat fucker) yet?
You don't have to put up with this crap, not for one microsecond.
Pat finds it 'entertaining' to watch cops beat people with sticks.
I prefer when the cops use tasers, but sticks are good too. Cops seldom beat somebody who doesn't deserve it.
"get me some popcorn." -Fat Douchely
When DON'T you demonstrate your addiction to food, Pat?
Have you seen yourself lately?
Pat, what steps are you taking to avoid that heart attack that's coming your way? Do you expect to live as long as your father did, Mr. 'Ice Cream Movement'?
So according to "Pat Cowardly", its ok for Truthers to kill people for a cause that's not worht fighting for but its not ok for the police to us force with a bunch of drug addicted paranoid jackaases named Truthers?
Truthers THRIVE on violence!
So Pat, are you sick of the troofer troll (aka the goat fucker) yet?
I don't think Pat Cowardly is Brian, though he may well be a pal of Brian's. My money is on the guy who posts as Snowcrash on 9/11 Flogger and Troofaction. His real name is Michiel De Boer. Note: Snowcrash denies being this Michiel De Boer, but that facial hair makes me suspicious.
So two questions for Brian:
Is that Michiel De Boer a Bay Area pal of yours?
Have you ever sported interesting facial hair?
"So according to "Pat Cowardly", its (sic) ok for Truthers to kill people for a cause that's not worht (sic) fighting for but its (sic) not ok for the police to us (sic) force with a bunch of drug addicted paranoid jackaases (sic) named Truthers?"
"Sic" semper ignoramus.
Truly your finest hour, chewy. First you misinterpret something, then you forget how to write simple words about it. It's not that hard, son. Pat loves you, though: you're one of the few who makes him look smart around here. Now get him some popcorn, QUICK! He hasn't eaten in MINUTES!!
My money is on the guy who posts as Snowcrash on 9/11 Flogger and Troofaction. His real name is Michiel De Boer.
Snowcrash uses odd English phrasings that I've seen native Dutch speakers use before. Doubt they're the same guy. Cowardly is also very OCD about his punctuation, like a disorganized mind grasping at control.
Truly your finest hour, chewy. First you misinterpret something, then you forget how to write simple words about it. It's not that hard, son. Pat loves you, though: you're one of the few who makes him look smart around here. Now get him some popcorn, QUICK! He hasn't eaten in MINUTES!!
Another giant leap towards a new investigation!
Oh, wait...
"...I don't think Pat Cowardly is Brian."
That's fine. I fail to see how the video you've linked into your comment helps us identify the troll who goes by the handle "Pat Cowardly."
Why do I think "Pat Cowardly" is the goat fucker?
The following list of personality defects or, if you prefer, traits should suffice:
[1] Passive aggressive personality;
[2] An obsession with other men's appearance--which is a good sign that "Pat Cowardly" is a homosexual;
[3] Vicious and inappropriate remarks (See item number 1);
[4] Delusional;
[5] Compulsive lying;
[6] Constant attempts to hijack the comment section. Provocateur;
[7] Driven by a compulsive need for attention;
[8] Judgmental in the extreme;
[9] Illogical in the extreme;
[10] Can't handle criticism;
[11] Inability to admit or acknowledge an error;
[12] Self loathing. (See item number 2). Low self-esteem;
[13] Persistent refusal to answer questions;
[14] Driven by narrow-minded morality;
[15] Arrogance in the extreme.
"Pat Cowardly" shares all the aforementioned defects (and more) with the goat fucker--which is remarkable to say the least.
"I prefer when the cops use tasers, but sticks are good too. Cops seldom beat somebody who doesn't deserve it."
That, unfortunately, is not true. Look at the photography is not a crime blog for plenty of examples.
I don't think it's expecting to much to expect the police to use the minimum force necessary and to not use force against people who are not breaking the law.
Bill, you've just described every truther there is.
FWIW, I don't think Cowardly is Brian - their insulting styles are too different.
Pat Cowardly is the same person who used to post as Arhoolie and a hundred other random sock puppets. Same ironic angry posts.
Oh, but watch him fly off the handle if you mention his friend Pat Dahany...
Do we even care anymore? They're all trolls at this point.
Pat finds it 'entertaining' to watch cops beat people with sticks.
What a douche.
Yeah, pass the popcorn.
Billman, are you trying to suggest that the ArseHooligan has somehow learned to use the space bar?
Nah....
:)
I work across the street from the protests and have been stopping by during my lunch hours to talk to people there. There's not much in the way of "truth" nonsense there, at least up front as something they're actively angry about.
The 20-somethings have been joined by a lot of gray hairs of late (and the gray hairs tend to be a lot nuttier, the 20-somethings are more pissed about a lack of job opportunities). I haven't seen Brian yet, but he's an unemployed janitor who probably can't afford the airfare.
Why are truthers always showing up on protests that have nothing to do with 9/11? Is it because they dont have enough people in their movement to actually form their own protest so they hijack some other protest? Truthers are sick people who use or hijack other protests to spread their delusional ideas. Ive seen them do that to so many protests now that it makes me sick.
"Pat Cowardly" said
"Pat finds it 'entertaining' to watch cops beat people with sticks"
----------------------------------
He didn't say people you puss filled bubo, he said troofer.
i think the cops are too polite considering what the lowlife imbeciles accuse them of.
i would like to see the NYFD deploy firehoses and wash the filth off the streets, police dogs set upon the runners then pepper spray the eyes of those halfwits chanting "the whole world's watching"
the fact is that all around the world people are chanting
"GET THEM!,GET THOSE STUPID,IGNORANT TROOFERS!!!
Gosh, you seem to be very emotional about this. Why is that?
Luke deserved to get his ass kicked by the cops. He is a hoodlum and trouble-maker.
So Luke deserves to get beaten by the police because of who he is, even though there is no basis for arrest? Sounds like what you want is a police state.
"He didn't say people you puss filled bubo, he said troofer." -911 Bloviator
Dehumanizing those you don't agree with... how American. Have fun with Pat, giggling your way to the 4th Reich. Don't forget to keep his popcorn coming: he's a touchy asshole when he's hungry. Ask James.
So Luke deserves to get beaten by the police because of who he is, even though there is no basis for arrest?
Disturbing the peace is a basis for arrest.
He wasn't charged with disturbing the peace. He wasn't arrested.
He wasn't charged with disturbing the peace. He wasn't arrested.
How is that relevant? We're talking about grounds for arrest. Disturbing the peace is grounds for arrest.
We were talking about being attacked by the police when there was no basis for arrest.
You said disturbing the peace was a basis for arrest but you provide no evidence that he was disturbing the peace.
You said disturbing the peace was a basis for arrest but you provide no evidence that he was disturbing the peace.
Rudkowski can be observed shouting obscenities in a public place, participating in a non-peaceful protest, and provoking police officers through hostile language and refusal to leave the area. All of those are disturbing the peace.
Excellent commentary here. Much of it applies to the Truth Movement as well. Bullseye quote: "The Occupy Wall Street people have no frame of reference; they’re like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie..."
So you think it's illegal to express hostility to police goons? And you think the remedy for this is beating rather than arrest?
Elie Mystal is just pulling an Ian--playing dumb, inventing his facts, and projecting his own hypocrisy on people he doesn't even know. K Street is a symptom, not a cause, and its strings are pulled from Wall Street and corporate HQs. The kids know what happened--a gang of thieves disbanded the regulators, made irresponsible investments, paid themselves enormous and unearned salaries, left the taxpayers to clean up the mess, and continued to pay themselves enormous salaries with the taxpayers' money.
Back in the 60's it cost $600 a year to go to Berkeley. Now it costs $16,000 a year. And Mystal thinks that the kids don't know that Wall Street profiteering and the War Profiteers are responsible for this state of affairs?
His belief that the kids would go to work for Halliburton if they could is absurd. If they wanted to be slimy PR flacks they would have gone to slimy PR flack school.
Back in the 60's it cost $600 a year to go to Berkeley. Now it costs $16,000 a year. And Mystal thinks that the kids don't know that Wall Street profiteering and the War Profiteers are responsible for this state of affairs?
Okay, Brian, I'll bite. how is Wall Street responsible for the tuition increases at Berkeley?
Do they still have the information in Loose Change about the stocks dropping? Because I can tell you why they were. Australian airline Ansett was under severe speculation that it was about to collapse, and went into administration on September 12th 2001 (September 11th in the US). This would have affected the stocks on most airlines.
Truly your finest hour, chewy. First you misinterpret something, then you forget how to write simple words about it. It's not that hard, son. Pat loves you, though: you're one of the few who makes him look smart around here. Now get him some popcorn, QUICK! He hasn't eaten in MINUTES!!
Awe, so your excuse is that you are illiterate and you can't read simple english because you an asshol & you admit being an asshole? Ok, I hear ya. Actually Pat has shown himself more of a man than you, so that's why you get all pissy about the "iron spheres" when Pat says that it's irrelevent.
Pat, Wall Street is responsible for a cultural atmosphere that caused the electorate to abandon the notion that free (or nearly free) higher education for the young was an investment in a prosperous future for everyone. Instead we get the ideologically-based notion, imposed by Ronald reagan, that marketplace values ought to run educational institutions.
You might recall the ENRON manipulations of the electricity market in California in 2000-2001 which basically bankrupted the state government, causing cuts in essential services such as education and fire protection.
The hundreds of billions of dollars going to the DoD every year and the massive war debt being run up all contribute to the economic constraints that inhibit public education.
Here's how that famous socialist Dwight Eisnehower put it:
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. The world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children....This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from an iron cross."
In the context of the full speech, who is Eisenhower blaming?
The context of 1953 doesn't matter. Who should we blame today, when the leaders of this country think we should outspend the rest of the world combined on our military, including maintaining 800 military bases overseas in a blatant effort to dominate the world?
Who should we blame today...
Brian "The not so" Good "lying son of a bitch". That's who!
I'm not the one who took down the Glass-Steagal firewall.
I'm not the one who approved fraudulent loan applications just so I could get the commission on the loan.
I'm not the one who looked the other way while credit-default swaps were written with no reserve fund to pay them should they be called.
I'm not the one who rated bonds at AAA a few weeks before their sponsoring institutions went under.
I'm not the one who said there's no need for laws against financial fraud because the market could take care of all issues of dishonesty.
I'm not the one who decided that an industry creating derivative products on a (sometimes imaginary) asset base of $600 trillion needed no regulation.
Don't blame me. It was those assholes I went to college with. And I knew they were assholes back then. Hell, THEY knew they were assholes.
It was those assholes I went to college with.
Guilt by association!
Brian, all of what you say is very nice and all, but what does it have to do with 9/11?
The purpose of this blog is to discuss 9/11, not for you to rant about anything and everything. So unless you have some evidence that the widows have questions or that modified attack baboons didn't plant micro-nukes in the towers, I'd appreciate it if you quieted down.
Ian, maybe if you'd read the original post once in a while you might get a clue about what the thread is about, but I doubt it.
Ian, maybe if you'd read the original post once in a while you might get a clue about what the thread is about, but I doubt it.
Look who's talking, the prequel!
Ian, maybe if you'd read the original post once in a while you might get a clue about what the thread is about, but I doubt it.
See what I mean?
More empty posturing from the pee-brain.
More empty posturing from the pee-brain.
Is that an open invitation to piss on your brain, Brian? Let me just unzipper my fly first!
That's an open invitation to piss on Ian's brain, if you knew how to read you would know that, and I couldn't care less whether your fly is open or not when you do it.
Post a Comment
<< Home