Fan Mail
It is amusing to get e-mails from readers who have just discovered our blog, and act like they have unveiled our nefarious plot forever. That is so 2006. Also amused by the ironic resemblance of his name to a famous FBI agent turned spy.
What is your motivation for creating this blog? Why put time and effort into discrediting a silly 911 twoofer movie? Screw Loose Change is a forgotten waste of time...unless you are being compensated to help destroy the credibility of a low budget film. Ultimately, your blog makes me wonder why people would care enough, on a personal level, to create it to begin with. If you are sponsored to discredit 2fas...WHY?
Just Curious
Robert Hanson
PS: Do you ever have internet privacy concerns? Every move you make online can be used as evidence against you now. (IE: I know who you work for you fucking treasonous coward.)
posted by James B. @ 5:11 PM
47 comments
47 Comments:
This comment has been removed by the author.
Obviously, the email is the work of a "responsible" troofer who masquerades as a debunker who masquerades as a irresponsible troofer.
Got it?
;^)
See also this. And especially this. Crap of the bat level crazy.
Wait, we can get paid by the NWO for this?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Some can, some can't. Don't get your hopes up.
Heh, the one he sent me was relatively sane.
Some can, some can't. Don't get your hopes up.
Brian would know how hard it is to get paid for work. Why, the company that last employed him wanted him to mop floors instead of babbling about magic thermite elves and invisible widows. The nerve of them!
Ian, in janitorial work trust is more important than productivity. You have all those keys. Liars get nowhere.
Ian, in janitorial work trust is more important than productivity. You have all those keys. Liars get nowhere.
That makes sense. You're a pathetic liar, and you couldn't hold down a job as a janitor.
No, you are a pathetic liar. If your SLC colleagues had any integrity at all they would object to your continued lying about the widows' 273 unanswered questions.
http://justicefor911.org/Appendix4_FSCQuestionRatings_111904.php
"Ultimately, your blog makes me wonder why people would care enough, on a personal level, to create it to begin with."
Because some people can't sit back and allow bullshit to run free. There have been consequences for letting stupid conspiracy theories fester: the extermination of the Jews in Europe because of the "Protocols of Zion", the Spanish American War, and even the attacks of 9/11 which came down to ridiculous barriers between the CIA,Military Intelligence, and the FBI allowing the hijackers to train inside the US.
So where ever some dumbass raises his/her "9/11 was an Inside Job" flag I will be right there the burn it.
"If you are sponsored to discredit 2fas...WHY?"
No surprise, this question doesn't even make sense.
No, you are a pathetic liar.
Brian, please provide the contact information for your legal counsel. I would like to discuss with him the libelous claim that I am a liar.
If your SLC colleagues had any integrity at all they would object to your continued lying about the widows' 273 unanswered questions.
http://justicefor911.org/Appendix4_FSCQuestionRatings_111904.php
Nobody cares about your questions, Brian, no matter how many times you try to pretend that invisible widows are asking them.
MGF, you couldn't burn a flag with a hundred tons of thermite.
Ian, you are a liar. That is a fact, and saying it is not libel.
Brian, you have not demonstrated a single time that I've lied.
"Brian, you have not demonstrated a single time that I've lied."
Squeal! Squeal!
"Brian, you have not demonstrated a single time that I've lied."
Squeal! Squeal!
Speaking of unanswered questions, zit-face still hasn't answered mine: has the "it isn't a beer belly, it's a fuel tank for a sex machine" t-shirt gotten you laid yet?
"PS: Do you ever have internet privacy concerns? Every move you make online can be used as evidence against you now. (IE: I know who you work for you fucking treasonous coward.)"
James works for the LA Kings?
Ian, you've lied about the widows being invisible, you lied in claiming there are no widows, you've lied in claiming the widows have no questions, you've lied in claiming that I flunked out of San Jose State, you've lied in claiming that I am mentally ill, you've lied in claiming that I babble about magic elves, you've lied in claiming that NIST has explained the collapses, you've lied in claiming you don't lie.
Ian, you've lied about the widows being invisible, you lied in claiming there are no widows, you've lied in claiming the widows have no questions, you've lied in claiming that I flunked out of San Jose State, you've lied in claiming that I am mentally ill, you've lied in claiming that I babble about magic elves, you've lied in claiming that NIST has explained the collapses, you've lied in claiming you don't lie.
Poor Brian. He's babbling hysterically because I've humiliated him so many times.
You lie and lie. It seems to amuse you.
You lie and lie. It seems to amuse you.
Taunting you certainly amuses me.
On that note, I will remind everyone that Brian still hasn't come up with any evidence against the proposition that the WTC was destroyed by micro-nukes planted by modified attack baboons. That's probably why Bill Deagle is still an esteemed member of the truth movement, while Brian has been banned from the movement.
Hey Brian, have the widows had their questions answered yet?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!
Ian, you continue to lie. I have come in with evidence against micro-nukes--the fact that no reports detect the elevated radiation levels that would be associated with them.
Bill Deagle is not an esteemed member of the truth movement. He was slapped down by Dr. Jones years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzZ9-RzMtzM&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL50D6267023C40DF0
Ian, you continue to lie. I have come in with evidence against micro-nukes--the fact that no reports detect the elevated radiation levels that would be associated with them.
That's because NIST stopped without ever investigating elevated radiation levels. That's why we need new investigations.
Bill Deagle is not an esteemed member of the truth movement. He was slapped down by Dr. Jones years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzZ9-RzMtzM&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL50D6267023C40DF0
How would you know who is or isn't an esteemed member of the truth movement? You've been kicked out of the group for being a liar and a lunatic sex stalker.
Also, every moment you waste babbling on this blog is another moment in which the widows haven't had their questions answered. Don't you care about the widows? What's wrong with you?
Tests of radiation levels were done.
Check out this paper on tritum at WTC:
http://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/241096.pdf
Also this one on radioactive iodine in Hudson sediments:
Oktay, S.D., et al. 2003. WTC geochemical fingerprint recorded in New York harbor sediments. Eos 84(Jan. 21):21–28
If you think NIST did an incomplete investigation of radioactive elements at Ground Zero, then you should be calling for further investigation.
I know Bill Deagle is not an esteemed member of the truth movement because he has not appeared at a 9/11 Truth conference since 2007.
Tests of radiation levels were done.
Check out this paper on tritum at WTC:
http://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/241096.pdf
Also this one on radioactive iodine in Hudson sediments:
Oktay, S.D., et al. 2003. WTC geochemical fingerprint recorded in New York harbor sediments. Eos 84(Jan. 21):21–28
If you think NIST did an incomplete investigation of radioactive elements at Ground Zero, then you should be calling for further investigation.
I know Bill Deagle is not an esteemed member of the truth movement because he has not appeared at a 9/11 Truth conference since 2007.
Nobody cares.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Exactly--your post was pointless, an unfunny joke.
Brian, you're the joke, not me. I just enjoy poking you and making you squeal and babble endlessly. You've been posting dumbspam on this blog for over 3 years, and it has accomplished you nothing. It's what I expect from a mentally ill unemployed janitor who lives with his parents.
Maybe tomorrow, your "widows" will have their questions answered, "meatball on a fork" will be published in a journal, and new investigations will begin.
More likely, however, is that you'll spend another lonely weekend posting spam on this blog about magic thermite elves.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ian, I've been slapping down nonsense here for quite some time--so effectively that intelligent posters have abandoned the field, leaving half-wits like you and Guitar Bill and MGF to lie and seethe and try to create the impression that you have substantive claims.
The widows can not have their questions answered tomorrow. It takes more than one day to convene an official investigation. If you really had the MBA you claim, you would understand that "tomorrow" is a self-discrediting argument unless you're aiming at the simple-minded set.
" leaving half-wits like you and Guitar Bill and MGF to lie and seethe and try to create the impression that you have substantive claims."
We have no claims. You are the idiot running around saying 9/11 was an inside job and the WTC was brought down using controlled demo.
You are also the one who has no proof.
Everyone else has left because:
1. The have lives.
2. You ignore facts when presented so there is no point in debating with you (because you have mental problems).
Ian and I are just here to point out what an ass you are, and your colossal foolishness. Ian has his reasons, mine if you are a sexual predator who uses 9/11 and the peace movement to sexually harass women.
This makes you scum.
MGF, you have many silly, idiotic claims. Like the claims that the widows' questions are answered. Like the claims that NIST has explained the essential mysteries of the towers' collapses.
I didn't say 9/11 was an inside job. You say you know it wasn't--when you don't and you can't.
I didn't say the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition. You say it wasn't. You are the one making claims.
Your belief that I sexually harass women is based on nothing more than the empty assertions of a proven liar (not to mention bigot, violence-monger, and domestic abuser).
Thanks for demonstrating that you and Ian aren't interested in 9/11 at all. You just have a big fat crush on me, which often seems to manifest itself on Friday and Saturday nights.
"I didn't say 9/11 was an inside job."
No. You are too cowardly to come right out and say it. Say what you want about other more reputable truthers (hehehehe) they hang it all out there. You came to the party let, and you're trying to hedge your bet. This means you either know 9/11 truth is a crock, or you suspect it is.
" You say you know it wasn't--when you don't and you can't."
I do know. On top of the non-mountain of evidence there has been no hint of 9/11 happening any different than it did.
"I didn't say the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition."
You do every day.
" You say it wasn't. You are the one making claims."
No. I state reality.
"Your belief that I sexually harass women is based on nothing more than the empty assertions of a proven liar (not to mention bigot, violence-monger, and domestic abuser)."
This is based on Carol's own words. One of you is lying. You prove on a daily basis you have a problem telling the truth.
MGF, you lie like a Barrett, like a Guitar Bill, like an Ian. Please cite the words where Carol says I harassed her. You seem to have some difficulty distinguishing between a) the liar and bigot and violence-monger and domestic abuser Barrett's claims about Carol's words and b) Carol's words. It's not surprising you have such funny ideas when you show such incompetence in dealing with simple issues of fact.
The evidence of a coverup about 9/11 is enormous--starting from Bush's reluctance to have an investigation at all, and the redaction of 28 pages of the Congressional report.
Your belief that I say every day that the buildings suffered controlled demolition only shows your reading incompetence. I never said that. I am not qualified to say that.
Carol issued her statement regard you. The link is peppered on the comments section of this blog.
"The evidence of a coverup about 9/11 is enormous--starting from Bush's reluctance to have an investigation at all"
He knew it would be a witch hunt, and it was.
, "and the redaction of 28 pages of the Congressional report."
Since you don't know what is in those 28 pages you can say either way, can you (playing by your rules).
"Your belief that I say every day that the buildings suffered controlled demolition only shows your reading incompetence."
You argue controlled demo in every thread.
"I never said that."
Coward. You've said it hundreds of times since January alone. Typical Brian Goode, make a statement and then run away from it.
"I am not qualified to say that."
You are not qualified to do anything except greet people at Wal Mart.
Carol's statement was a complaint about what she fantasized was in my mind. She didn't say anything about harassment.
Your comment on the redaction of the congressional inquiry makes no sense.
I don't argue controlled demo. I argue physics. I slap down your incompetent claims. I never said the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, and your belief that I did only further proves that you are incompetent to perceive reality and you live in a fantasy world.
"Carol's statement was a complaint about what she fantasized was in my mind. She didn't say anything about harassment. "
She made it clear.
"Your comment on the redaction of the congressional inquiry makes no sense."
Because I'm using your logic, so duh.
"I don't argue controlled demo. I argue physics."
You argue controlled demo because your physics is incompetent at best.
"I slap down your incompetent claims."
In your mind.
"I never said the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition"
Yes you do. All the time. Then you run away from it because you know it's a lie. Just like you run away from everything.
MGF, Carol made it clear, and what she made clear was not what you said. Your inability to distinguish reliable information from unreliable goes a long way to explain why you are so confused about 9/11.
Your claim that you were using my logic makes no more sense than your unintelligible remarks about redaction.
You have not shown Newton's 1st and 2rd laws or the 1st and 2d laws of thermodynamics to be incompetent. Expect a Nobel Prize when you do.
I never said the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Your lack of reading comprehension goes a long way to explain why you seize on simplistic ideologies to try to make sense of life.
You, a college dropout, are a fine one to talk about running away.
"Frankly Brian,
I don't think your attacks on me, Kevin Barrett, and William Rodriguez have anything to do with Kevin Barrett or William Rodriguez or anything rational. The attacks have to do with Brian Good and Carol Brouillet and are completely emotional. You have a crush on me and erroneously hold delusions about me. You are being irrationally jealous of Kevin and William. You cannot accept the fact that I am happily married and refuse to allow you to TRY to cause trouble between my husband and I. Because of your delusions, I cannot ever feel "safe" in your presence alone, and would rather not see you
again, but you are so desperate for attention that you are doing
extremely negative, destructive things- attacking me and respected
members of the 9/11 Truth Movement to force me to pay attention to you.
Please stop attacking Kevin, William and I. Do something useful-attack the people who did 9/11, not the people who are putting so much
effort into exposing the lies and stopping them. Leave me alone- stop
the email attacks on me and others. I think it probably harms your
reputation more than mine, although it is horrifically embarrassing to
me to think that at one time I thought of you as a friend. Now I only see you as a threat to me, my family, the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance and the 9/11 Truth Movement. I have zero confidence in your judgement and rationality.
Carol Brouillet"
I can read just fine, pervert.
Thanks for proving my point. Nothing about harassment. Complaints about what she believed was in my mind, and complaints because I exposed a couple of liars. You don't know how to read.
Well, just as I expected, Brian spent the weekend posting idiotic spam about his delusional belief that the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition on orders from the Bush administration.
For good measure, he was also squealing hysterically over the fact that everyone knows he was banned from the truth movement for stalking Carol Brouillet.
Ian, I've been slapping down nonsense here for quite some time--so effectively that intelligent posters have abandoned the field, leaving half-wits like you and Guitar Bill and MGF to lie and seethe and try to create the impression that you have substantive claims.
Squeal squeal squeal!
Poor Brian, he's so delusional that he thinks he's been "slapping down" anyone. He actually thinks people here listen to his pathetic babbling about magic thermite elves.
No Brian, others left because they got bored with you. I still enjoy how upset I make you whenever I point out that you're a mentally ill unemployed janitor who lives with his parents. You failed out of San Jose State, couldn't hold down a job, and have the worst haircut on earth. That's why your "widows" will never have their questions answered, no matter how much you squeal about it.
Ian,, all you have is obvious lies. You discredit your own arguments, discredit yourself, discredit everyone here who remains silent about your nonsense, and you discredit this blog.
Your belief that my haircut has something to do with the widows not getting their questions answered tells us about all we need to know about your analytic powers.
Ian,, all you have is obvious lies. You discredit your own arguments, discredit yourself, discredit everyone here who remains silent about your nonsense, and you discredit this blog.
My, such squealing!
Your belief that my haircut has something to do with the widows not getting their questions answered tells us about all we need to know about your analytic powers.
Well, your haircut, like your obsession with the "widows", indicated that you're in serious need of psychiatric care.
"You cannot accept the fact that I am happily married and refuse to allow you to TRY to cause trouble between my husband and I. Because of your delusions, I cannot ever feel "safe" in your presence alone, and would rather not see you
again, but you are so desperate for attention that you are doing
extremely negative, destructive things- attacking me and respected
members of the 9/11 Truth Movement to force me to pay attention to you." - Carol Brouillet
"Thanks for proving my point. Nothing about harassment" - Brian the Perv.
Post a Comment
<< Home