Wednesday, July 12, 2006

War Plan Red

One of the biggest topics running around the conspiracy theory community, Loose Change among them, is Operation Northwoods. Supposedly the fact that there was a plan concocted over 40 years ago to fake a plane shootdown (not a hijacking) is somehow connected to 9/11. This is ignoring the fact that the plan did not involved the murder of thousands of Americans and destruction of billions of dollars of property, and even then was considered so farfetched that the plan was immediately dismissed by the Kennedy Administration, who themselves were hardly strangers to adventuresome foreign policy.

But still the conspiracy theorists point to the fact that a plan was conceived as proof that it somehow would be carried out. Just because someone brainstormed faking a plane crash somehow indicates that this might be done. They have never precisely demonstrated the connection, did some neo-con in the 90s come across this plan in some dark archives, or was this purely coincidental? In any case, if the mere presence of a plan indicates a possibility of it being carried out, then what other sinister operations should we prepare for?

Ladies and Gentlemen, I bring you War Plan Red. Prepare yourselves for the invasion of Canada:

The United States government does have a plan to invade Canada. It's a 94-page document called "Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan -- Red," with the word SECRET stamped on the cover. It's a bold plan, a bodacious plan, a step-by-step plan to invade, seize and annex our neighbor to the north. It goes like this:

First, we send a joint Army-Navy overseas force to capture the port city of Halifax, cutting the Canadians off from their British allies.

Then we seize Canadian power plants near Niagara Falls, so they freeze in the dark.

Then the U.S. Army invades on three fronts -- marching from Vermont to Lake Montreal and Quebec, charging out of North Dakota to grab the railroad center at Winnipeg, and storming out of the Midwest to capture the strategic nickel mines of Ontario.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy seizes the Great Lakes and blockades Canada's Atlantic and Pacific ports.

At that point, it's only a matter of time before we bring these Molson-swigging, maple-mongering Zamboni drivers to their knees! Or, as the official planners wrote, stating their objective in bold capital letters: "ULTIMATELY TO GAIN COMPLETE CONTROL."

As if this weren't enough proof of their devious plans, there is even a website, in the style of PNAC, pointing out their motives http://invadecanada.us/. They have a plan, they have a motive, it is only a matter of time before those evil neo-cons carry it out, eh?

7 Comments:

At 12 July, 2006 09:15, Blogger shawn said...

Yeah, they don't seem to get that we have plans for invasion of pretty much every country on the planet.

They've obviously never heard the term "contingency plan" before.

 
At 12 July, 2006 10:30, Blogger Alex said...

Back bacon? Hey, fuck you, eh? Ya hoser. There's more to Canada than Bacon, eh? We got maple syrup, hockey, and beer too!

 
At 12 July, 2006 10:32, Blogger shawn said...

There's more to Canada than Bacon, eh? We got maple syrup, hockey, and beer too!

psh we get our syrup from Vermont.

Don't you guys just call Canadian bacon ham anyway? At least Tom Green told me that.

 
At 12 July, 2006 10:50, Blogger Alex said...

Don't you guys just call Canadian bacon ham anyway? At least Tom Green told me that.

Uhm, not to my knowledge. Although Peameal Bacon and Ham look pretty similar, they taste quite different.

If you promise to keep Celine Dion, Keanu Reeves, and Nickelback north of the border, we promise not to invade.

Sure, as long as you keep Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, and Dylan Avery south of the border :)

Besides, the last time you invaded, it didn't go so well now did it? ;)

 
At 12 July, 2006 11:03, Blogger James B. said...

I am reminded of the South Park movie:

Our government has apologized for Bryan Adams on numerous occasions!

 
At 12 July, 2006 11:21, Blogger Alex said...

"Tha Canadians have bombed the Baldwins!"

 
At 12 July, 2006 19:33, Blogger Falco98 said...

s/did not involved/did not involve/

O:-)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home