Tuesday, July 11, 2006

It All Makes Sense



When you read this page.

29 Comments:

At 11 July, 2006 12:01, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Like, hey man I mean , like that's an awful lot of reading to do.

I just want to know where the pods went.

 
At 11 July, 2006 12:02, Blogger James B. said...

Wow, I didn't know Laura Bush made sex toy commercials. I always suspected those libarians had a wild side though.

 
At 11 July, 2006 12:59, Blogger Unknown said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 11 July, 2006 13:00, Blogger Unknown said...

Scott Adams is in on the conspiracy to... by denying it....

Here

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:01, Blogger shawn said...

The Shield of David + Swastika is the most disgusting symbol ever.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:14, Blogger shawn said...

Not nearly as fast as the muppets implicated Al Qaeda. It's amazing how they have absolutely no fucking idea what is going on, until 3 hours after something happens, then they know exactly who was behind it. It;s like magic... or bullshit?


Never heard of an MO, dumbass?

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:14, Blogger shawn said...

You gullible nitwit you.

Irony alert.

Back and to the left, roger.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:20, Blogger shawn said...

The funniest part is al-Qaeda hasn't been blamed, Lashkar-e-Toiba was.

 
At 11 July, 2006 17:59, Blogger shawn said...

really!

Type "lashkar al qaeda" into google news and then say that again please.


Do you have any working brain cells?

They're connected. Islamic terror groups tend to be.

 
At 11 July, 2006 20:11, Blogger shawn said...

Ah, the mind of the bootlicking suberviant class hard at work.

"Nobody is blaming Al Qaeda!"

Um.

"Of course Al Qaeda is involved!They all talk on the phone! It's a conspiracy!"


God, you idiots with your "omg u sheep/zombies/mindless mass" argument. It just makes you look worse.

So this Muslim supremicist group gets the blame and it's everyone blaming al-Qaeda?

And why do you continue to ignore your own stupid ideas and brush them off with some insult of someone else? (Next time don't mention defected KGB agents before saying if you agree with them or not.)

 
At 11 July, 2006 20:12, Blogger shawn said...

Back and to the left, rog. C'mon, man. Back and to the left! It makes perfect sense!

 
At 11 July, 2006 20:12, Blogger shawn said...

Oh, when are you gonna show us everyone blaming al-Qaeda, by the way?

 
At 12 July, 2006 09:09, Blogger shawn said...

It's becoming harder and harder to differentiate between parody and the rantings of a sincere nutter. Which is this?

I think roger sincerely believes this nonsense, just he's not as serious about talking about it as the others.

 
At 12 July, 2006 09:10, Blogger shawn said...

You OS'ers block heads act like childern.

And you link to a story that doesn't disprove anything we said.

Are you retarded? Have they tested you.

You really shouldn't be saying anyone acts like a child jack. Children believe in fairy tales without any evidence...y'know, like the 9/11 "alternate theories".

 
At 12 July, 2006 10:35, Blogger Alex said...

I'm the one who knows where JFK's brain is

Now if you could only find your own...

Cue the Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz singing "If I oooonly...had a braaain..."

 
At 12 July, 2006 18:33, Blogger shawn said...

You're a mindless cunt and a fucking college student. Get into the real world and maybe your eyes will open slightly.

Mindless? You called me anti-god, and I'm mindless? I'm gonna let you in on a little secret: God isn't logical.

And I took a break from school at one point and went out into the world, working, living on my own. I guess your stupid point doesn't matter. Age doesn't bring intelligence, I'm smarter than most college grads I know.

Your idea of "evidence" is limited by your personal bias towards anything that may upset your prefect little mainstream world.

Do you people understand irony? It has nothing to do with bias. If so, I wouldn't have gone from a devout Catholic to an atheist.

Fuck no you say, we're in Iraq for their freedom. Bush is limited our freedoms for our own good. BS, Bush isn't doing nothing to limit our freedom.


I know you probably didn't mean to say it, but yes, he's done nothing to curtail our freedoms. I'm more afraid of university speech codes hurting my freedoms than Bush.

Funny, after I called you on your childish "logical fallacy" this and "logical fallacy" that and got you hot under the collar you have NOT USED IT ONCE since. That really shows that you were using as a personal attack.


I never denied using ad hominem. The difference is (as I've said countless time) I won't just go out and insult anyone until they show themselves to be fools. And I used it like one thread ago, do you read anything?

You're a fucking joke you cunt.

Enough with the irony people! We get the idea.

 
At 12 July, 2006 18:33, Blogger shawn said...

You're a mindless cunt and a fucking college student. Get into the real world and maybe your eyes will open slightly.

Mindless? You called me anti-god, and I'm mindless? I'm gonna let you in on a little secret: God isn't logical.

And I took a break from school at one point and went out into the world, working, living on my own. I guess your stupid point doesn't matter. Age doesn't bring intelligence, I'm smarter than most college grads I know.

Your idea of "evidence" is limited by your personal bias towards anything that may upset your prefect little mainstream world.

Do you people understand irony? It has nothing to do with bias. If so, I wouldn't have gone from a devout Catholic to an atheist.

Fuck no you say, we're in Iraq for their freedom. Bush is limited our freedoms for our own good. BS, Bush isn't doing nothing to limit our freedom.


I know you probably didn't mean to say it, but yes, he's done nothing to curtail our freedoms. I'm more afraid of university speech codes hurting my freedoms than Bush.

Funny, after I called you on your childish "logical fallacy" this and "logical fallacy" that and got you hot under the collar you have NOT USED IT ONCE since. That really shows that you were using as a personal attack.


I never denied using ad hominem. The difference is (as I've said countless time) I won't just go out and insult anyone until they show themselves to be fools. And I used it like one thread ago, do you read anything?

You're a fucking joke you cunt.

Enough with the irony people! We get the idea.

 
At 12 July, 2006 18:34, Blogger shawn said...

Oh, I get it, you think it's childish to point out your (and by this I mean "you idiot conspiracy theorists") logical fallacies? Sorry you've never encountered them till they got to this blog.

Roger tried your moronic trick before, it didn't fly.

 
At 12 July, 2006 21:05, Blogger shawn said...

I have mentioned that you wage a daily internal war against him, as you strangle with him show through in your writing (opps, duidn't think anyone noticed huh?), but never once have I called you anti-god. Maybe the guilt of being "anti-god" is catching up to you? Let me tell you. It's hard for an ass to fight against the whip.


Wow, you are dumber than nesnyc. I wage a daily war with Him? Wanna know the only place I've mentioned Him in months? Here and other 9/11 conspiracy forums. The 9/11 conspiracy nuts and religious zealots are quite similar, and I use the comparison.

I think about other fictional characters far more often than the Lord God Himself.

Weren't you the one talking about Catholicism being a cult? If so, you called me anti-god. I may have you confused with one of the other whackos.

Anyways, go talk to an advance physicist some time about God, like say Stephen Hawking. See what he has to say. He will blow your little mind away about God.

Uh Stephen Hawking is an atheist, pal.

Lose the pride kid.

...it's the God's honest (hehe). I can't "lose" the truth. I know people smarter than me, too! Woulda look at that? Doesn't change the fact I'm one of the more well-read people I know.

 
At 12 July, 2006 21:06, Blogger shawn said...

Oh, didn't think I'd notice how personal you take my "little crusade" against the Lord? You become ever angrier as I bring up the irrationality of the belief.

 
At 12 July, 2006 22:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, I rather enjoyed getting shown up when I'm wrong.

Then you must be a very very happy man.

Funny, I go to pro-government blog to get information about 9/11 being an inside job.

Who the fuck said this was a pro-government blog? Unless you mean that literally, then yes this is a pro-government blog because I'm positive that the blog contributors as well as the bulk of us love America. But I'm guessing your mean pro-Bush or pro-administration. I don't support the President and I have serious issues with the current administration that have gone back further than 9/11. Unlike you though I actually go about solving these issues in a manner respectful of our founding fathers. Why don't you find some real issues to care about instead of crying "NWO, NWO!!"

 
At 12 July, 2006 22:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Also I wouldn't bother throwing around Stephen Hawkings name. If you had one-billionth the intelligence he had you wouldn't buy into this CT crap.

 
At 13 July, 2006 03:24, Blogger shawn said...

He's actually Agnostic, meaning he can't prove that God exist while at the same time he can't prove he doesn't exist.

You do know the word agnostic was invented because a guy got tired of the term "atheist"?

 
At 13 July, 2006 03:26, Blogger shawn said...

You attacked me on my belief, do you expect me to sit back and take it?

Belief. I'm not big into the "faith" thing.

 
At 13 July, 2006 03:26, Blogger shawn said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 13 July, 2006 15:07, Blogger Alex said...

" It is quite possible that God acts in ways that cannot be described by scientific laws, but in that case, one would just have to go by personal belief."

In other words, he saying that yes, it's possible that God acts in ways which leave no scientific evidence. We've certainly found no scientific evidence of him. But if that's the case, then the only basis for beleiving in him is blind faith. However, since we have no way of telling whose faith is right and whose is wrong, beleiving in any of them is simply a sign that you are inclined to be irrational. I could say that the only true god is the Queen of the Purple Flying Unicorns. Since you have no way to test that statement, it would make just as much sense to beleivin in it as it would to believe in the Christian, Muslim, or Jewish god.

 
At 14 July, 2006 05:54, Blogger Alex said...

How did you avoid getting locked up in an insane assylum? Seriously. I'm really curious.

 
At 15 July, 2006 15:55, Blogger shawn said...

Wonder why? Maybe becuse atheist means one who does not believe in God, and agnostic is one with the knowledge to know that there is a god? Hmm, big different there huh?

you do love being wrong, don't you? An agnostic doesn't believe in God, they say there's no evidence for one.

Neither believes in God.

September 11, 1941 pentigon is laid
September 11, 1990 Bush giv his NWO speech
Septmeber 11. 2001 Attack on the big 11 by flight 11 where Ishtar watches over New Babylon.


September 11, 1918 - Red Sox win their last World Series for eighty-six years.

"[The war in Iraq is] a rare pportunity
to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times... a New World Order can emerge."


There's no capitals in what he said. He said "new world order".

Knowing what you're talking about is important

wait for 2012... it's going to be a fun year...

Yeah, let's follow the end of a calendar from a long-dead people.

 
At 16 July, 2006 12:40, Blogger shawn said...

Then there is the theory of the God particle.

Wow, you're dumb as dirt. They call it the god particle because of the aspects of the mythological God, not because it supports the existence of such a being.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home