Another Excellent Debunking
Daylight Atheism does an excellent job of debunking Loose Change. Part 1 (covering the Pentagon) is here. Part 2, on the collapse of the World Trade Center is here. We'll link the third part of this series, on United 93 and the grand conspiracy theory that ties it all together when it is posted.
posted by Pat @ 4:12 PM
6 comments
6 Comments:
Pat,
I've only looked at Part II, so far. Your contention that this is an excellent debunking is just outrageous. It is nothing of the sort.
This kind of lightweight regurgitated stuff really doesn't belong in the vaulted position you place it in.
I think if you study the details, review the 911 Eyewitness video, and think it over, anyone has to say the craziness going on here is with this blog cheering on the fraud that somehow these post not only debunk Loose Change, but also debunk the overall charges of a controlled demolition.
I want to stay on good terms with you guys, but I have to call shameless shoddy work what it is.
I read on the 330 degree turn and stopped right there. I had to laugh.
Anyway, this piece is by a lefty and they don't want anything other than the same system only with leftists in charge. They will turn blue in the face trying to make Bush look evil and his corporate connections (like M.Moore) but always fail to bring up his family's Nazi past. Don't believe their hype.
Nesync,
Could you clarify? I'm missing what you are saying exactly.
Nesync,
Could you clarify? I'm missing what you are saying exactly.
Nesnyc you are INSANE, there's no two ways about it. Nobody has any actual enemies, they're just invented strawmen!
Do you know what circular logic is? (Rhetorical question, you obviously don't.)
BG, you are also a nut. There's absolutely ZERO CONCRETE EVIDENCE THAT A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION TOOK PLACE. The only people who say that are people who either fill in facts where they see fit (or have never seen an actual controlled demolition) or just want to believe because they hate the president so much (you seem to fall in the latter camp). I hope those pictures on your blog aren't your kids, because we have enough idiots in America.
Loose Change is a joke just because it isn't consistent in its own internal logic. It's like reading a science-fiction novel that sets rules and then consistently breaks them, but uses a bunch of smoke and mirrors so the brainless can ooh and ahh at all the "revelations".
"bg: If you have any specific objections to make to my post, feel free to present them. However, as you'll no doubt understand, I look dimly on people who just wave their hands and dismiss my argument without being able to show any actual errors in it."
Adam, it's impossible to prove to these people what actually happened. If we had a perfect video of a plane hitting the Pentagon, they'd say it was faked. If you somehow had a video of the entire interior of the WTC and showed no explosives were set off, they'd say it was faked.
Hell, we have the Zapruder film which shows the shots that hit Kennedy could've only come from the Texas School Depository, yet people still think there was a shooter in the grassy knoll.
Regurgitated in the way you keep regurgitating that 9/11 Eyewitness film, BG?
I'm seeing a pattern with you. Anytime somebody questions the CT, you brush it aside as "shoddy" work. Anytime someone asks you to back up the CT, you use that film as "evidence".
I'd like to stay on good terms with you myself BG, but quite frankly, you're starting to lose your charm.
Post a Comment
<< Home