The Real Conspiracy
Proud Kaffir over at Red State outlines his theory:
The Clintons, however, had eight years to put together their plan and put the right people in the right places. I know some conspiracy theorists say that a neocon cabal inside the governement planned the attacks for years but this is cutting the Clintons short. Certainly they would not have allowed such infiltration under their watch. They were the ones that placed people in key postions. Richard Clarke ran the operation after they left office.
Why would the Clintons do it? They did it in order to return to the White House under President Hillary Clinton in 2008. They realized the public would support Bush and the GOP for the next several years clearing the field of potential Democratic challengers. They also knew that eventually they could strip Bush of his support. Notice that Bush had an approval rating of over 90% but now, as we get close to the lead-up to the Presidential race, he has dropped to 30%. Coincidence?
Obviously just for fun.
posted by Pat @ 12:31 PM
10 comments
10 Comments:
Clinton has CIA ties and was Governor of Arkansas during Iran-Contra and Mena drug scandals broke out. He is a highly connected CFR member and friends with the Bush.
Wow. This CT stuff is fun. And easy too.
More like hidden in plain sight; once your realize what there is to see, there is no way you can ever ignore it again.
nobody actually believes Clinton was behind it.
The government's power expanded exponentially after OK City and during Clinton's watch. Alex Jones is a great critic of Clinton and his Bilderberg connections. Some even feel Clinton is actually an illegitimate Rockefeller.
nesnyc, do you just said Alex Jones was a good source on something. How many times are you going to shoot yourself in the foot?
And the government's power increased exponentially under FDR, he's the one that destroyed the Founding Fathers' America. Obviously, he started the NWO and joined the Freemasons and Illuminati.
proud kaffir,
I take you at your word.
However, the validity of the truth of circumstances, actions, collusions relating to Clinton, 9/11, bin Laden, etc., etc. are not dependent in any way to what your intentions, knowledge, or state of mind where you composed original piece.
I'm not saying nesnyc and I are speaking from one voice on this.
However, clearly the planning within the US started before the Bush admin. The fact that Rick Rescorla (link not available at the moment) predicted on video in 1998 that the Towers would be hit again (1993 being the first) by Jihad Terrorists makes me believe a faction of determined people who probably see themselves as Patriots for America had this idea to stage false flag terror up sleeve for quite a while.
There is evidence (an email to his daughter) that Rick Rescorla had specific foreknownledge of 9/11.
Look, Proud,
I respect your right to have an opinion and express it.
If Mr. Rescorla is the man you say he was, there's nothing I can say or do that really takes that honor away from him. I may offend you and others, but I really my speech here of little matter to his loved ones, and to his legacy. In my book, the mockery of uninformed people have not power to take anything away from true heroes. Spare me you "please, please"
Who Mr. Rescorla was, in the end has no real bearing on what actually happened on 9/11.
I believe he had foreknowledge and was associated in some way with those who were behind it. I don't offend anyone for the sake of being offensive. I honestly believe talking about what seems to be the truth is consistence with morality in many cases.
BG, Ric Rescorla is a particular hero of mine. He certainly knew the WTC was a target (after all, they tried to knock it down once), and he anticipated that it might be by plane as was discussed at some length in an A&E special that was bundled with Flight 93.
But to jump from that to Ric was in on the plot? Un-uh.
Call me crazy. Call me disrespectful. I don't enjoy being considered a pariah. I just think the following is suspicious.
This was Rescorla's last e-mail to his daughter at law school, dated Sept. 10:
"Your mission . . . should you choose to accept it . . . dream, then scheme. . . . This country will be coming out of its slump about two years from now. It's going to be a time for legal eagles of all kinds to leave their rocky promontories, spread their wings, and do what eagles tend to do. . . ."
"However, clearly the planning within the US started before the Bush admin. The fact that Rick Rescorla (link not available at the moment) predicted on video in 1998 that the Towers would be hit again (1993 being the first) by Jihad Terrorists makes me believe a faction of determined people who probably see themselves as Patriots for America had this idea to stage false flag terror up sleeve for quite a while."
Yes, it's quite odd to think the exact same group would try to target the exact same buildings again. Everyone loves America and nobody wants us to die. Hopefully, you're not in nesnyc's camp where you think Osama bin Laden is some fake terrorist.
Your logic doesn't stand because the government wouldn't have gone overkill on the fake attack if it wanted to start a war. They would've done the simplest and smallest possible thing to get us all riled up. The Nazis didn't bomb the everliving crap out of the Reichstag and utterly destroy it, they lit a fire.
Hitler may have lit a fire, but Nero set more than just a fire: he burned down half the city!
And then he blamed it on an extremist semetic religious sect...
Post a Comment
<< Home