New CT Term for the Day
The term is "plane hugger", and refers to those who insist that planes actually hit the World Trade Center.
posted by Pat @ 1:56 PM
25 comments
As Seen in Vanity Fair's August 2006 Issue!
As Seen in US News & World Report's September 11 Fifth Anniversary Issue!
As Seen in Time Magazine's September 11, 2006 Issue!
As Seen in Phoenix New Times' August 9, 2007 Issue!
Saturday, June 17, 2006
Previous Posts
- WTC 7
- Logical Fallacies of Loose Change
- Debunking 9/11 Myths: The Book
- Coming to a Best Buy Near You
- Loosers on Hunter S. Thompson
- Larry Silverstein: Evil Jewish Landlord
- No, They Aren't Paranoid
- Coup On Capitol Hill!
- An Example of the Reverse-Engineered Theory
- Al Qaeda Admits Responsibility for 9-11 Again
View My Stats
Allies:
25 Comments:
Wow.
Kind of like the nosecone penetrating 3 rings at the Pentagon and then disappearing after it punched the exit hole!
Woot for strawmen! It was the landing gear, stupid.
"Have you hugged a plane today?"
I have.
7 at last count. (I was bored and was hanging out at JFK all day.)
Like the people making those comments, you guys just seem to be running around in circles, heh heh..
here is a link to a bunch of eyewitness accounts of people who saw Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
Oh yeah! Some of those witnesses actually saw the "humans" in the windows of the plane, @ 500MPH????? LOL.
now who's going in circles, you guys cant even agree on a single conspiracy
C'mon Default.... Why settle on just one truth when it's so much more fun to have 37 different truths?
Think outside the box every now and then dude....
:)
Oh yeah! Some of those witnesses actually saw the "humans" in the windows of the plane, @ 500MPH????? LOL.
And every one saw a plane...every going to not use a nonpoint?
9-11 was not an inside job about 1 in 1,000,000
The probability that 9/11 was not an inside job is 1.0. None of you people understand probability, I blame the schools.
Ban this guy, he's spamming the posts.
Great find Marky. I've only just read the opening page and it seems as though Avery has conveniently forgot about the fact the hijackers said they also had bombs.
Bombs tend to be a little bit more scary than knives.
I don't have an opinion on this except to say that the Flight 93 crash is definitely one that could have and should have gotten the normal NTSB airplane crash investigation and it stands out like a sore thumb that it didn't.
NTSB does tests and reconstructs when the cause of a crash needs to be determined. Since the flights were caused by hijackings, this puts them under the jurisdiction of the FBI. It is the same with all the 9/11 flights.
now who's going in circles, you guys cant even agree on a single conspiracy
There is only one conspiracy! The US government was responsible with a little help from their friends in MOSSAD.
There is only one conspiracy! The US government was responsible with a little help from their friends in MOSSAD.
Oh those dastardly Jews!
There is only one conspiracy!
And Mohammed is his prophet.
And Mohammed is his prophet.
And he is a descendant of Abraham.
Once again nesnyc gets right to his Jew-hatred...
Zionist.
Yeah. BWAHAHA. Some people are so stupid they even go to drag races and watch the cars, imagining they can actually see them cross the finish line when they are moving so fast. What idiots, huh?
Doubt those cars go 500MPH and are airborne. I think there's a SLIGHT difference, or isn't that clear to you?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Oh those dastardly Jews!
They only "think" they are Jews; they are Zionists from the land of Khazars and have no relationship to the ancient House of Juda.
Inside, reposting encyclopedia long entries in every thread is spamming. If you want to make an argument, feel free to address whatever issue is being argued. If you want to reference some more in-depth material, then link to it. If you repost this in every thread it makes it difficult for people to read the thread. If you be disruptive, I will remove your post so that you do not intefere with others who want to actually have a discussion.
They only "think" they are Jews; they are Zionists from the land of Khazars and have no relationship to the ancient House of Juda.
A vast majority of Jews are Zionists, ergo you're blaming Jews. They are Jews, they follow the teachings of Moses, and speak Hebrew.
hahahaha! you'd love to silence me wouldn't you? rather than actually respond to the evidence.
Uh if dissent were to silenced, all the idiots who keep posting debunked nonsense (as you don't read older threads) would be banned. Inside, you've posted a list of 'facts' that have been debunked six ways to Sunday. And you spam it in every thread.
Besides which, you should realize that when you post a 5,000 word rant, and especialy when it's the same one in multiple threads, people simply scroll past it. Nobdy wants to waste 15 minutes reading over your verbal diherrea, especialy when the first few sentences are enough to realize that you're absolutely clueless.
Besides which, you should realize that when you post a 5,000 word rant, and especialy when it's the same one in multiple threads, people simply scroll past it. Nobdy wants to waste 15 minutes reading over your verbal diherrea, especialy when the first few sentences are enough to realize that you're absolutely clueless.
There was a USENET kook by the name of Ed Wollmann years ago. HE constantly complained about people beign skeptical in the astrology newsgroups. He tried all kinds of underhanded tactics to punish them..such as setting follow-ups to his moderated newsgroups and complaining to ISPs when replies were made.
Anyway, his favorite tactics was screed. He would post incredibly long posts with pages and pages and pages of gobbledygook. All of it was just junky pseudo-metaphysical astrology nonsense that was pure cut n' paste. He would post these a couple dozen at a time in hopes of flooding out critics of astrology. These posts were eventually called 'screed'. They wereinfamous until USENET became a complete wasteland.
Whenever a CT kook posts something that they obviously did not write, and that that requires three full rotations of the wheel mouse to get past it, I think of Wollmann's screed.
these guys also took what I said about WTC7 falling faster than freefall speed (due to implosions sucking floors downward) out of context in order to make me look stupid.
I showed how it's impossible to fall faster than free fall.
SINCE FREE FALL IS HOW FAST YOU FALL IN A VACUUM. You know, what an implosion can cause?
these guys also took what I said about WTC7 falling faster than freefall speed (due to implosions sucking floors downward) out of context in order to make me look stupid.
See default.xbe's explanation. Then stop for a second and realize that the stupidity inherent in your claim is so extreme that most of us now consider you little more than a somewhat well spoken incompetent. It's like having a grown man try and tell you that the sun sets every night because the gravity in the west sucks it down. It's so ridiculous that I for one will probably never again even CONSIDER any "facts" which you may decide to bring up, let alone actually bother to analyze them. Furthermore, your insistence that you're right, despite all of us trying to explain to you just how gormless your claims truly are, tells me that you'll never accept ANY evidence or logic which we present to you. When you can't even stop and acknowledge that you're wrong about implosions sucking buildings down faster than gravity allows, how am I supposed to discuss ANYTHING with you?
Post a Comment
<< Home