Just Pathetic, Dylan
We may be starting to make him feel a little guilty, because he's put up a whole bunch of letters from survivors asking for a copy of his DVD. He closes with this pathetic cry:
Should I keep going? I have thousands of these. I'm sick and tired of people accusing us of insulting the victims.
By accepting and defending a clearly flawed and compromised investigation into the murder that took their lives, and by attacking those that choose to seek the true answers behind that day, YOU are insulting the victims. Not us.
So back down. Or come meet these people on September 11th, 2006, and tell them that what THEY believe is nonsense. Tell them that they are insulting themselves.
I'd love to see it.
I'm sorry to have to do this, but certain people really get to me sometimes. I tried to redact any revealing personal information, so if I missed anything please let me know so I can remove it.
Got any complimentary letters from Wendy Burlingame, Dylan? Or, say, Lisa Beamer or Mark Bingham's mom? Betty Ong's family? No? I wonder why that could be?
posted by Pat @ 2:11 PM
12 comments
12 Comments:
It is funny that he dares his accusers to come down to the memorial and state our case to the victims, as if it would be villainous to do it. Well yes, it would be, and that is why most of rational, respectuful human beings don't. Did that stop his crowd from going to ground zero and harrassing people that were there...NO!!!!
He is such a hypocritical creep.
If he wants to prove me wrong, he should take all of the money he makes off lose change, minus production costs (as verified by an independent accountant), and donate it to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11.
You're still a terrorist supporter, Dylan. I'd tell you that on your forum if I weren't suspended, and I'll say it to your face if the opportunity presents. But no, I'll not get into an argument at a memorial service any more than I did at the Flight 93 opening.
You are Osama's little yapping bitch.
Sorry to be so chatty, but I noticed the first letter he quotes lost someone on flight 77. I guess D.A. will send them the DVD for free so they can watch him tell the audience that the pentagon wasnt hit by flight 77, but by a missile, and that his cousin is still alive, along with all the other flight members, who were all aboard flight 93 (according to LC v2). How long with those comments torture that poor soul. According to D.A. and LC, his cousin, who is supposedly still alive, hasnt contacted his/her family to tell them.
"The creators of LC dedicate our film to all those who lost there lives in 9/11, except to those of you who have relatives on the flights, who are still alive but not telling you."
Like Hey man, the first letter I mean has initials , LT that would be like Leonard Taylor listed, like that guy, man, are they gonna be surprised when they find out he's still flying around somewhere!
I mean, he writes this note trying to get a free DVD out of me, and like he tells me about LT, like he was really on Flt 77, when everybody knows that there was no plane at the Pentagon.
I mean did you read those letters? gimme gimme gimme, like I know somebody who knew somebody whose best frind was a cousin, gimme gimme gimme.
and I'll say it to your face if the opportunity presents.
I'd do more than say something to him.
you're pretty hardhearted if you don't feel for those people. The pain comes through in those letters. They don't think the official version is the truth.
They're not immune from being wrong.
still hanging on the Wendyb myth eh?
Roger, c'mon, we all know it's you! You told us so yourself!
Joan, you'll note that I said nothing negative about the writers of those letters. That there are conspiracy theorists among the 9-11 victims is not surprising to me.
Dylan's film specifically denigrates one group of the people who died on 9-11 and their families: the folks who made the cellphone/Airfone calls, especially the folks on Flight 93. He also denigrates the passengers, and the folks in his forum laugh at the pilots for getting overwhelmed by hijackers with "ho ho" boxcutters.
Unlike the CTs who usually cite 1 reference for a dozen claims, or as definitive proof...come on.
CT eg.
Use the BBC interview and one other article to prove, without a doubt, that many of the hijackers are still alive. Nowhere in the article does it say that those interviewed were al qaida operatives, nowhere does it say that the pictures the FBI used as the final photos, were any of those interviewed as "alive" hijackers.
If you actually read the interview, in its entirety, and then do a little rationalizing and research of your own, you will find something a little different. Unlike the cases in that interview, where the ages were often different that those of the hijackers, and sibling connections were mismatched, you will find other articles from arab news agencies that discribe other people with the same names as the hijackers. In these cases, however, they match in age, and the sibling connections are dead on. As well, they are reported as missing by family members.
"John Smith was the 20th hijacker. Suddenly CNN reports that hundreds of people claiming to be John Smith swear they are still alive and well."
Now does it seem a little more rediculous...I hope so.
Roger, are you still claiming that you posted as Wendy Burlingame? Because in that case, you owe the folks at the Loose Change forums an apology, not we.
By the way, been like 36 hours at least since the proprietors of this blog had it confirmed that they've posted a fictitious source, and I STILL don't see a retraction.
Man, you do have a real flimsy grasp on reality. You saying something doesn't "confirm" it.
This from someone who cites the 9/11 Commission for facts and evidence...
Woo woo poison the well.
What the fuck do I care if you want to live in ignorance?
You seem to have no problem with the fact you do.
No, I'd rather let everyone accuse me of being a liar and then have it show up later.
You really don't understand how this works? What a child.
No, I'd rather let everyone accuse me of being a liar and then have it show up later.
Too easy:
You're a liar. Regaurdless of whether or not you're lying in this particular case (and I think you are), you've proven time and time again that you ARE a liar.
Post a Comment
<< Home