Clowns to the Left of Me, Jokers to the Right
We've certainly heard of a few 9-11 Denier Democrats running for public office, a couple Greens and some Libertarians. But this is the first Republican 9-11 nutbar that I can recall.
In an editorial board interview with The Telegraph on Wednesday, the candidate, Mary Maxwell, said the U.S. government had a role in killing nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center and Pentagon, so it could make Americans hate Arabs and allow the military to bomb Muslim nations such as Iraq.
Maxwell would not specify if she holds the opinion that the government stood by while terrorists hijacked four domestic airliners and used them as weapons, or if it had a larger role by sanctioning and carrying out the attacks.
Let me guess, she's just asking questions? And this is pretty wild:
She said this strategy “would be normal” for governments, citing her belief that the British government – and not the Germany military – sank the Lusitania ocean liner in 1915. The deaths of Americans on the cruise liner helped galvanize U.S. support to enter World War I, and benefited England, she said.
Interesting stuff indeed. Has anybody ever suggested that perhaps it was the French who bombed Pearl Harbor? Cui bono, indeed!
It's been awhile since we've pulled out the old Nutbar-O-Meter, but this woman clearly deserves it:
85 Comments:
Interesting stuff indeed. Has anybody ever suggested that perhaps it was the French who bombed Pearl Harbor? Cui bono, indeed!
Actually, the US goaded the Japanese into attacking Peal Harbor so it would not seem the US was the aggressor. The US had broken the Japanese codes and knew when and how the attack would take place and did nothing to prevent it. Once attacked, the US could go after the Axis powers that included Germany. Roosevelt (Rosenfelt) was part of the ruling elite that wanted to destroy Europe and reshape it according to globalist design.
Yes, it was General Tojobaum who directed the attack to drag us into the war with the Japanesesteins and Germanbergs.
Just curious, Nessie. Has anything ever happened which wasn't the fault of Zionists? Three Mile Island? The Vietnam War? The Cubs not winning the World Series? Anything?
The Cubs not winning the World Series?
Zionist goat.
Cass:
ROFLMAO
Everyone needs a BJ from time to time (male and female), but you are right, NESSIE really needs one...lol
List your sources NESSIE.
By the way - I could go through every single point made in your post and tear it a new one.
I know, the "offical" story always differs from reality. But leave it at that, I know what the "offical" story about WW2 is and I discount it as bullshit just like 911.
Actually, the US goaded the Japanese into attacking Peal Harbor so it would not seem the US was the aggressor.
Yeah, we 'goaded' them by cutting off supplies when they decided that Raping Nanking and other fun activities in China was going to be their new standard.
This is like saying you had the firebomb the Pizza place becuase the owner kicked you out for beating up other customers.
The US had broken the Japanese codes and knew when and how the attack would take place and did nothing to prevent it.
Complete and utter nonsense that every person actually familiar with the codes of that era knows to be nonsense. Most of this code crap comes from Stinnetts discredited book on Pearl Harbor.
Every historian with more than a smidgeon of sanity knows the "let it happen" nonsense doesn't hold water.
Has anything ever happened which wasn't the fault of Zionists?
When money, or credit rather, was consolidated in central banks in Europe, this group of people have been manipulating events ever since. The start of their world revolution was the French Revolution. All World Wars are a result of direct manipulation of this hidden ruling class. They are not Zionists. Zionists and Zionism are simply their creation to alter people’s perception of each other and further divide and conquer the planet. They created Fascism, Communism, Corporatism and of course Zionism.
Look up "Black Nobility" and you'll see some of their visible leadership.
Raping Nanking and other fun activities in China was going to be their new standard.
Uh.. Ever heard of "Manifest Destiny?" How come no one ever came here and stopped it? Would that have been appropriate? Hypocritical.
Uh.. Ever heard of "Manifest Destiny?" How come no one ever came here and stopped it?
China's part of the Japanese island? Man, you must've flunked geography along with history.
Notice nessie's only source of info is antisemitic hate sites.
Only a historical ignoramus would say we knew the Japanese were attacking Pearl Harbor on December 7.
I know, the "offical" story always differs from reality.
If you believe the exact opposite of what nesnyc says, you have a 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 percent chance of being right.
New book my Professor Griffin came in today. Something about blending Christianity with knowing the "truth" about 9/11. Skimmed through his evidence of his inside job, and it's all totally debunked nonsense. Also, he devotes an entire section to historical false-flags, like that gives him any support.
Uh.. Ever heard of "Manifest Destiny?" How come no one ever came here and stopped it? Would that have been appropriate? Hypocritical.
That we did something in the past is no excuse for someone to something far worse in the present.
Also, we didn't stop the events in China. We just stopped supplying the ones who were doing it with 20th century raw materials. Who and what would have done that in the Manifest Destiny era, and what good would it have done?
All of this ignores the fact that you have completely failed to support your claim that we 'goaded' Japan into attacking.
For you telecscope
Pearl Harbor: the prequel
Pearl Harbor: Antecedents, Background and Consequences
America's Phoney Wars
BTW, my point on Manifest Destiny is that no one interfered with it. Why? It was half a world away (from the "known" world) and no of their business really.
So the US trying to stop Japanese imperialism when they were actively enforcing embargos on them insured Japan would keep on doing what it was doing. The US is not the victim here by a long shot.
Nice he links to prisonplanet.
The US is not the victim here by a long shot.
You invert victim and aggressor in pretty much every conflict in human history.
Nesnyc needs a little history lesson:
The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in an attempt to knock out the Pacific fleet so they could expand without worry of American interference.
It wasn't retaliation for cutting off oil and steel exports.
The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in an attempt to knock out the Pacific fleet so they could expand without worry of American interference.
Why did they need to "expand?"
In July 1941, the US government announced a freeze on all Japanese funds in the USA and the suspension of all trade. Britain and the Netherlands, along with their colonies, quickly followed suit. Japan was left with about 18 months' reserves of petroleum. 'America provoked Japan to such an extent that the Japanese were forced to attack Pearl Harbor', recalled Captain Oliver Lytletton, production minister in Churchill's cabinet, in 1944: 'It is a travesty on history ever to say that America was forced into war.' (3)
Like I said before, this was direct provocation from the US and insured the Japanese would hit. The US clearly knew the outcome. It was strategy that worked like a charm..
Nesnyc needs a little history lesson
You need to throw away those books you were raised on because they contain nothing but manufactured "history."
You need to throw away those books you were raised on because they contain nothing but manufactured "history."
Ok so in this moron's mind it's better to ignore primary sources and pull history out of your ass.
Like I said before, this was direct provocation from the US and insured the Japanese would hit.
hahah cutting off trade is a provocation! hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha
You get dumber by the day.
When money, or credit rather, was consolidated in central banks in Europe, this group of people have been manipulating events ever since. The start of their world revolution was the French Revolution...
I know the party line on this. That's why I didn't include, like, the War of the Roses or the Great Schism or anything like that. I ask again, after the formation of the world rulers did anything happen which wasn't their fault? Did they make AIDS? Are they behind the wars between Tutsi and and Hutu? Did they make Joe Pisarcik fumble?
hahah cutting off trade is a provocation!
Betcha expanding it is, too.
hahah cutting off trade is a provocation!
Did you read? They had about a year and a half worth of petroleum left in reserves. What were they supposed to do, starve?
Did they make:
AIDS?
http://virusmyth.org
Pharmaceutical bonanza
Are they behind the wars between Tutsi and and Hutu?
Remnants of colonialism easily manipulated, who provided the arms?
Did they make Joe Pisarcik fumble?
Sports are the opiate of the masses
starve? they eat oil now?
We do, somewhat. But without oil, there is no electricity or machinery working. A lot of food is processed or refrigerated, cultivated and farmed. IT TAKES OIL!
anyone else think the only person with something in his water is nessie?
May I present fluoride?
Like I said before, this was direct provocation from the US and insured the Japanese would hit. The US clearly knew the outcome.
Little problems with your links and claims NeSync:
Japan was practicing the attack 7 Months! before the oil was turned off.
Yeah, sure. We goaded them into what they were planning form the beginning.
You also ignore the fact we agreed that if Japan stopped the warring and raping.
about japan ceasing hostilities with china
Like I said, Japan was undergoing expansionism not unlike the US's manifest destiny. The Americans killed the Native Americans, the Japanese killed the Chinese. Eventually, I think China would have retaliated but the real problem here was the British interests in China and not China itself. Americans and Bits could give two shits about those people. All they really wanted was to remain dominant hence the "surprise attack" and resulting war.
recalled Captain Oliver Lytletton, production minister in Churchill's cabinet, in 1944:
Why is this person's opinion considered accurate or relevant?
hahaha he believes AIDS is a myth and all that fluoride nonsense.
There is no help for this sad sap.
Nesnyc's logic - if I found it on a horribly run website it must be true! (Even if it flies in the face of all supported evidence.)
Japan was practicing the attack 7 Months! before the oil was turned off.
That's like the US troops stationed near Afghanistan BEFORE 911! The Japanese knew what was coming. Those kinds of operations take months of planning (Lebanon?). The US was goading, provoking for nearly a decade before the "attack."
Why is this person's opinion considered accurate or relevant?
Why is the government version considered relevant or accurate?
Why is the government version considered relevant or accurate?
Probably because it has all of the evidence behind it - you know, the total opposite of your worldview.
hahaha he believes AIDS is a myth and all that fluoride nonsense.
And that the world-ruling cabal made Joe Pisarcik fumble. Every right-thinking person knows for a fact that God Himself made Pisarcik fumble. That's why 77803 people simultaneously damned Him.
every war in the history of warfare has been about resources, whats your point? why was the "zionist plot" for the US to attack japan? maybe the zionists wanted china out of the way and the US mucked it up
Like I said before the Zionists are only relevant to Israel and the eventual destruction of the Middle East. The "Globalists" Oligarchs, Aristocrats, European Black Nobility, whatever you want to call "them" are responsible for globalization and the consolidation of power in the world under a centralized form of Government. Japan was getting out of line and too ambitious and getting in the way of British (read Black Nobility's) interests.
Additionally, since Hitler had a pact with Japan, it would then create the perfect excuse to get the US to fight a war on two fronts and expand its military apparatus exponentially in perparation for their coming imperial empire.
whatever you want to call "them"
I'll call them "figments of the imaginations of a bunch of people who are such simpletons they don't understand how complex the world is".
Probably because it has all of the evidence behind it - you know, the total opposite of your worldview.
FDR said it himself you should listen to him:
"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." Franklin D. Roosevelt
So there was no "surprise" attack on America at Perl Harbor. It was planned that way. Everything else is bullshit.
I'll call them "figments of the imaginations of a bunch of people who are such simpletons they don't understand how complex the world is".
Didn't you ever hear about the Dark Ages? Those same "them" are still around, why would they have vanished? It's foolish to think otherwise.
The "Globalists" Oligarchs, Aristocrats, European Black Nobility, whatever you want to call "them" are responsible for globalization...
Toldja that expanding trade was a provocation, too. I must be one of them cykicks. Call Randi and tell him to get that million bucks ready!
don't understand how complex the world is
The world is only complex to those who do not understand how it works. Basically, there is, has and will always be class warfare happening if the masses remain ignorant of who pulls there strings. It's "them" against us, it's really quite simple.
They have all the resources which to manipulate us with and they have been doing this for centuries. You were just born yesterday and have a lot of catching up to do.
It's "them" against us, it's really quite simple.
No, the world isn't that simple. I guess you missed my point completely.
Now he's linking to religious fanatics. Wonders never cease.
Was Xerxes also a globalist oligarch?
those zionists sure are taking their sweet ass time, theyve been at this for millenia
They are actually preparing the thrown of world Government for their King. Time is almost here.
No, the world isn't that simple. I guess you missed my point completely.
Also, I am a "them," not an "us," thankyewveddymuch.
Wow you believe in the Left Behind nonsense?
BTW how was alexander preparing for the antichrist 300 years before there was a christ?
It really doesn't matter what WE believe, it matters what those who are in charge believe.
In a brief summary, this is what I think is going to happen:
1. The world will be destroyed by war. Israel and Islam will be the cause.
2. The Royal Houses of Europe headed by Prince William will derive a truce and a peace plan that will usher in the world government
3. Price William will then be crowned King and rule in the rebuilt temple of Solomon in Jerusalem. He will sit on King David's throne.
This is what the Zionist conquest means and why industry and mineral wealth will be controlled from there. The Jews currently there, however, would have perished during the war since that's part of the plan.
The Jews currently there, however, would have perished during the war since that's part of the plan.
You're taking your future history from a book written by a guy on shrooms who was exiled to an island.
You're taking your future history from a book written by a guy on shrooms who was exiled to an island.
Like I said, it's not what we WANT to believe, it's the people at the top who think they have the RIGHT to rule over us and what they believe. That's their plan, not mine.
Willy doesn't figure in to Revelations.
Willy doesn't figure in to Revelations.
you still didnt answer my question, if globalization is a zionist invention what role did alexander the great play in their plan?
You have it mixed up. Zionism is an invention of Globalization. Zionism was created to create a conflict against Islam. Alexander the Great is out of the loop by a few centuries. Different oligarchs.
Globalization =/= globalist.
Jeez, nesnyc, I figured you of all people would understand there's a difference.
then the globalists have been trying tot ake over the for for 5000 or more years, and seem to fail at every attempt, why is now the "end times?"
This time they have nuclear bombs. A population reduction is what they want and is what they will get.
In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.
--Prince Philip
Globalization =/= globalist.
Jeez, nesnyc, I figured you of all people would understand there's a difference.
I know what you're getting at. The current people in charge claim to have "Davidic" lineage all the way back to ancient Israel. And no, it's not the Jews. In fact, they hate the Jews and why they put them in harms way over in the Zionist state.
So THEIR theology has a lot to do with things. Empires of old were about conquest, that is true. But they are not the same people who currently control the planet.
so theyve waited thousands of years to get their hands on a weapon to reduce the worlds population to what it was thousands of years ago
Almost. They were in charge for the most part during the Dark Ages. But then came the Renaissance and they had to do things differently to avoid revolutions. They do indeed want to go back to a feudal system and population numbers that will not pose a threat to them.
Why is the government version considered relevant or accurate?
Because it is backed up by eyewitness accounts on both sides. The evidence fits it and vice-versa. There is a host of evidence that backs up the state of the world, far more than a single paragraph from some drunk, inbred British demi-hemi royalty who was the second choice for the patronage job that got.
The Japanese knew what was coming.
Yeah, they did. THEY PLANNED IT!
Kinda hard to make a surprise attack without some planning, y'know?
plus, if the indoctrination and media control is as deep as you claim theres no need to reduce population, the average man on the street poses no threat because he doesnt know "they" exist
They want to abolish ALL armies, that includes the US military. At what point do you think Americans will just allow that to happen? No amount of media conditioning can bring that about. That has to be forced on us by terrible hardships yet to come.
they wouldnt want to reduce millions or billions of followers to just a few thousand, not now, not ever
I read a figure some place that the plan is to reduce world population to 1 billion useful servants. They will use war, famine and disease to accomplish this.
I read a figure some place that the plan is to reduce world population to 1 billion useful servants.
Yeah, unfortunately there's no such "plan" anywhere.
Eliminate the Useless Eaters
You'll have to find an unbiased site. Forgive me for being skeptical of a site that embraces the unsupported NWO belief.
You'll have to find an unbiased site. Forgive me for being skeptical of a site that embraces the unsupported NWO belief.
From another angle:
The deliberate population reduction strategies and tactics affect predominantly the developed nations. On average, they are losing population at the rate of 30 percent with every successive generation. Therefore the Caucasian sector of the world population will decrease from its present 17 percent down to ten percent by 2050 3 and will have virtually vanished by 2100, when it will most likely be in the order of about six percent or less of the world population.
There's a reason for the above. BTW, Pat Buchanan wrote that. I don't think he's an NWO nut though.
http://www.fathersforlife.org/health/popcontrol.htm
and the population is declining 30% every 20 years?
He's talking about the Caucasian population. But I remember, just in the 70's, 4 - 10 children families. How many of those do you see now a day? How come people are getting married and having kids later in life? This is truer in the White race than any other. Observe the proof is all around you.
All you have to do is call a shrink and repeating what you write here....and the Joos are as good as gone!
The "chosen" people see White people as a threat. That's why their population is being targeted by integration schemes. Not that I don't think people should get along, I'm a darkie BTW, but the people that forged this country have been deliberately targeted for covert population reduction. Think about it. Reversed discrimination is a reality.
typo:
"shouldn't get along"
Nes, you have the cart before the horse. Reread history, and remember that the reason the US cut supplies is because of Japanese expansion, specifically their designs on Manchuria, the Philippines, and other resource-providing islands and nations in the "Asiana" region of the Pacific. Recall that the oil embargo was imposed after the Japanese occupation of southern Indochina, after they had walked out of the League of Nations sessions censuring their activities in Manchuria, and after they had officially declared they would no longer abide by the Washington Naval Disarmament Treaty, which itself was a response to the failures of the two London Naval Treaties attempting to limit naval armaments between the signatory nations, including Japan.
Reagarding Group Captain Lytteltton's quote about the "travesty on history": He was addressing an American Chamber of Commerce group in London when he said this in '44. As misguided as the quote was - he apologized for later - his intent was to build a myth of American cleverness among civillians, not to state that the US had deliberately goaded Japan into war.
(Aside for others: Nes's source accidentally misspelled the name; it's "Lyttelton", not "Lytleton". Just pointing it out for accuracy, not as a criticism.)
Also, as far as the assertation that Japanese codes had been "broken" before Pearl Harbor: Too broad and glib. The JN-25A acodes were known; the mathematical solutions to them were in the government's hands. However, the Japanese also used ciphers that had not been broken yet, and in fact, as one example, in 1940 switched to one eventually called the JN-25B code, and that one wasn't successfully solved and accurate decryptions didn't occur until after the battle of Midway. At any rate, before Pearl Harbor, of all the codes the Japanese used, only a fraction had actually been decrypted; as another example, going back to JN-25A, only 3800 out of 55,000 intercepted messages had actually been decrypted, and those that were had marginal utility. Certainly none of the message decoded actually gave the US prior warning of an attack. Remember, too, that the US leaned on the broken "Purple" code very heavily because it was the cipher used by the Japanese foreign office, but prior to Pearl Harbor, it contained nothing about the upcoming attack. Why? The military distrusted the diplomats, and hid information from them; recall that the Japanese diplomats delivered the declaration of war well after Roosevelt was aware of the attack, because they themselves were at the tail end of the information trail. So out of the codes that the US knew about, not all were decrypted, and the ones that were either had little value or contained zero information about the attack. In summary, it's too much of a stretch to leap from the fact that the US had broken many codes to the fact that the US was warned of an attack. The first is a fact, the second is an erroneous conclusion based on assumptions drawn from the fact.
You need to view original sources. You keep on quoting material that itself is based only on superficial readings of the original sources.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Oh, for the love of God, why did I respond to this guy. I only read some of what he wrote; didn't realize he's so deluded he buys into the Zionist conspiracy.
Plus, I didn't take too close a look at his avatar; didn't realize at first it was Ahmadinejad.
Guys, Nesnyc must be trolling. He can't be serious; there's no way someone would be that cartoonish in their beliefs.
BTW, Pat Buchanan wrote that. I don't think he's an NWO nut though.
But he is a racist.
But he is a racist.
And the jooos aren't?
Joking aside: you do actually display some aspects of paranoid schizophrenia. It might be worth getting it checked out.
Hey at least I don't hear voices, yet ;)
But seriously, I'm not worried for me. I know what's going down and how to react to it when it does. You guys should heed my warnings and prepare to live seriously uncomfortable lives. You can't say no one ever warned you. Take the red pill.
And the jooos aren't?
See, that's a racist statement. You paint an entire people with one brush.
How are they racist? Hmm allowing Arabs the most rights they have of any country in the Middle East? How racist of them! Equal rights are racist as sin!
How are they racist? Hmm allowing Arabs the most rights they have of any country in the Middle East? How racist of them! Equal rights are racist as sin!
Israel is a racist Apartheid state! Everyone is equal there, unless they are not Jewish.
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING its resolution 1904 (XVIII) of 20 November 1963, proclaiming the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and in particular its affirmation that "any doctrine of racial differentiation or superiority is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous" and its expression of alarm at "the manifestations of racial discrimination still in evidence in some areas in the world, some of which are imposed by certain Governments by means of legislative, administrative or other measures",
RECALLING ALSO that, in its resolution 3151 G (XXVIII) of 14 December 1953, the General Assembly condemned, inter alia, the unholy alliance between South African racism and Zionism,
TAKING NOTE of the Declaration of Mexico on the Equality of Women and Their Contribution to Development and Peace 1975, proclaimed by the World Conference of the Intenrational Women's Year, held at Mexico City from 19 June to 2 July 1975, which promulgated the principle that "international co-operation and peace require the achievement of national liberation and independence, the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism, foreign occupation, Zionism, apartheid and racial discrimination in all its forms, as well as the recognition of the dignity of peoples and their right to self-determination",
TAKING NOTE ALSO of resolution 77 (XII) adopted by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity at its twelfth ordinary session, held at Kampala from 28 July to 1 August 1975, which considered "that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regime in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a comon imperialist origin, forming a whole and having the same racist structure and being organically linked in their policy aimed at repression of the dignity and integrity of the human being",
TAKING NOTE ALSO of the Political Declaration and Strategy to Strengthen International Peace and Security and to Intensify Solidarity and Mutual Assistance among Non-Aligned Countries, adopted at the Conference of Ministers for Foreign Affairs of Non-Aligned Countries held at Lima from 25 to 30 August 1975, which most severely condemned Zionism as a threat to world peace and security and called upon all countries to oppose this racist and imperalist ideology,
DETERMINES that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.
The resolution was revoked by Resolution 4686 on December 16, 1991.
Better luck next time.
Everyone is equal there, unless they are not Jewish.
If there were so, Arabs couldn't serve in the Knesset.
Why do you keep arguing with me on subjects I obviously know far more than you about?
And wow the UN's idiotic resolution that was condemned as such. Great evidence.
The UN said it! It must be true!
Well I guess Rwanda wasn't a genocide then.
The resolution was revoked by Resolution 4686 on December 16, 1991.
Better luck next time.
LOL! Big deal, the damage was already done. The Zionist system was exposed for what it is. It's that simple.
But that res. 4686 was only passed to bring the Zioinst regime to the negotiation table and only that reason. After Durban, the same issue surfaced and gave the Zionist system yet another black eye.
And wow the UN's idiotic resolution that was condemned as such. Great evidence.
Why is "Israel" the biggest violators of UN resolutions?
The UN said it! It must be true!
LOL! You brown shirts had your panties all up in a bunch when Saddam was supposedly violating UN resolutions. Why is the UN good to get Arabs and not good for the Zionists? The UN is a joke, I agree but they have their moments every now and then.
LOL! Big deal, the damage was already done. The Zionist system was exposed for what it is. It's that simple.
You really are an idiot. By your logic, Germany is still an opressive faschist regime bent on world domination, because they were exposed as such back in 1939. Even assuming that the original UN document had any validity to it (which it didn't, but let's assume), it has since been retracted. In other words, either the original authority behind the document realized it had been wrong on some or all parts, or the problems in question were corrected and the document no longer accurately represented the reality of the situation. Either way you'd have to be an utter ignoramus in order to quote a UN document from 1975 when that document was retracted in 1991. That means it hasn't been valid for at least 15 years, yet you still cling to it like it were your security blanket. Idiots like you will still be quoting the same resolution in 3006, and they too will be too stupid to figure out why their misuse of it makes them the laughing-stock of anyone with any modicum of intelligence.
Why is "Israel" the biggest violators of UN resolutions?
The same reason that resolution 3379 was allowed to pass in the first place; because the UN is a racist amalgamation of despots which every year attempts to pass more resolutions against Israel than it does against the rest of the world combined. That little factoid alone tells you all you need to know about exactly how "impartial" the UN is, or how relevant any of their resolutions are. But, ofcourse, to a holocaust denier like you it won't seem like anything unusual.
Why is "Israel" the biggest violators of UN resolutions?
Probably because it has a disproportionate amount of resolutions against it (one third of all resolutions). I know for a rabid anti-semite like yourself that wouldn't seem odd, but for those of us who live in the real world with countries like the Congo and China and Iran violating human rights left and right every second of every day, it makes little sense to focus so intently on a small secular democracy in the middle of people whose greatest wish is its peoples destruction.
Let's not ignore that the largest voting bloc in the UN is the Arab nations.
You brown shirts had your panties all up in a bunch when Saddam was supposedly violating UN resolutions.
Hmm we're brown shirts (odd the only actual Nazi who posts here breaks Godwin's Law) for wanting to overthrow a fascist whose political party was based off of the NSDAP.
Odd that someone so against "globalists" would defend the resolutions of the UN. Even worse he only defends it when said resolutions are against the only nation on Earth with a majority of Jews.
Post a Comment
<< Home