Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Terrific Post from a Liberal Canadian

This guy can write!

What I found wasn’t a group of people searching for the truth, I found a vast network of people living and dying on shoddy reporting, bad evidence, embarrassingly horrible science, and outright lies. I was puzzled by this because these people claimed they wanted the truth. I would assume if you wanted the truth about 9/11 you would speak to people who are experts in the fields you’re investigating. Talk to chemistry professors about fire and steel so you can figure out for yourself how the Towers collapsed; talk to flight attendants and airport security personnel about the procedures that were in place on 9/11 so you can determine how they were circumvented, talk to computer programmers about creating a simulation of the North tower collapse so you can examine how the debris would have damaged Building 7. All of these things might be out of reach for one person, but as I said this movement comprises of thousands of people. Their stated purpose is to pressure the United States government in to launching a full and independent investigation it to September 11th, what they don’t realize is that if they were organized, open minded and did a proper investigation themselves they wouldn’t need the government to help them. However it appears that the goal of the leaders of this movement is not one of truth at all.


Highly recommended!

14 Comments:

At 16 August, 2006 23:00, Blogger default.xbe said...

they want the govt to conduct an "independent" investigation because if it proves them wrong they can say its faked

if they do their own investigation and prove themselves wrong they have no fallback position

 
At 17 August, 2006 06:41, Blogger CHF said...

I keep asking Deniers who should be on an independent investigation.

I've never heard a single name from them.

Probably because their investigation would be full of Jones, Wood, Fetzer, Griffin etc.

 
At 17 August, 2006 08:32, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 17 August, 2006 08:34, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Like hey man, I intend to take the profits from Loose Change, the Final Final Cut and pay for an investigation.

The results will be in Loose Change: The Last Final Cut.

 
At 17 August, 2006 12:08, Blogger nesNYC said...

people living and dying on shoddy reporting, bad evidence, embarrassingly horrible science, and outright lies.

That's exactly what the "offical" version is comprised of.

 
At 17 August, 2006 12:14, Blogger Dog Town said...

That's exactly what the "offical" version is comprised of.

Nestrodumbas got it right for once!The official CT version is a crock! Good to see the light?

 
At 17 August, 2006 13:08, Blogger shawn said...

That's exactly what the "offical" version is comprised of.

Can you go one comment without uttering a falsehood?

 
At 17 August, 2006 15:41, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Nesnyc is like that little logo in the bottom corner of the TV screen that lets you know which channel is on (in his case it is CT-TV). Now what do most of us do wrt that logo...ignore it...

 
At 17 August, 2006 16:11, Blogger JoanBasil said...

Theres nothing wrong with the public expecting their government to answer questions.

Here's an interesting link about the British terror plot. Of the 25 or 26 people arrested in Britain, I've heard/read that 2 were released already; there were no airplane tickets bought; there were no bombs but merely "interesting" items; and some of the arrestees didn't have passports.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/

 
At 17 August, 2006 16:34, Blogger Alex said...

No, but there IS something wrong with individuals beleiving that the government has an obligation to answer every single one of their questions, regaurdless of how idiotic they may be.

The government has already explained all the important questions about 9/11. NIST is providing more answers as time goes by. Questions which YOU pose are either irrelevant, based on false premises, or can be answered with a quick google search, or a 1 minute discussion with someone who has an IQ over 90. Therefore, the government has no obligation to answer your questions.

 
At 18 August, 2006 00:54, Blogger Pat said...

Joan, let's all see what develops in that case. They were wrong about the guy they shot right after the second attempt at the tube bombings, but they weren't wrong about the guys who actually tried the second attack.

 
At 18 August, 2006 13:38, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

No, unfortunately what will happen Pat, is that most of us who post here will wait, and if they were wrong we will admit it, and say they jumped the gun. THE CTers HOWEVER, will say it is PROOF POSITIVE that 9/11, 7/7, 8/10, WWII, and all other "conflicts" are the work of the NWO and Illuminati.

 
At 20 August, 2006 19:57, Blogger cor said...

'This guy can write [spin]'

"Talk to chemistry professors about fire and steel so you can figure out for yourself how the Towers collapsed"

Really?

http://www.physics911.net/closerlook.htm

Here's an excerpt:

'But steel-framed skyscrapers have never collapsed from fire, since they're built from steel that doesn't melt below 2750 degrees Fahrenheit. No fuel, not even jet fuel, which is really just refined kerosene, will burn hotter than 1500 degrees Fahrenheit.'

"what they don’t realize is that if they were organized, open minded and did a proper investigation themselves they wouldn’t need the government to help them."

Unless the government wont give them any information because that would point to the government committing the act.

And Alex:

"The government has already explained all the important questions about 9/11."

Like why the steel was shipped out of the country before anyone could really find out what happened to it? Wouldnt all the archeticts in the world like to find out how those massive buildings just EXPLODED?

Steel buckles when it approaches melting point. Why didn't the towers twist and break apart instead of EPLODING?

Or why the military stood down instead of launching interceptors? The 'hijacked' planes were off course for over an hour or so. Is the military really that dim witted. Yes, but the real answer is no.

Or why bush said he saw the first plane hit live on TV, when it wasn't broadcast live? - Yes he did say that twice.

 
At 20 August, 2006 20:06, Blogger cor said...

Er, I think I misstook your comments as a representation of 'this guy can write' and went off on the wrong track - that link wouldnt open for me. just delete my previous post and call me an idiot . . .

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home