Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Chris Bollyn Fired from the American Free Press

"Journalist" Chris Bollyn, fresh off of being attacked by Zionist cops, has now been fired by his newspaper. Obviously they must be part of the 9/11 coverup too!

Petherick's letter of dismissal gave two reasons for firing Bollyn:

His first reason:

Petherick implies that I have submitted false stories. I have, therefore, asked him to clarify exactly which stories of mine were factually incorrect.

Petherick's second reason was that I was a disloyal employee who had accused AFP of being under the control of some other agency. He said, I have asked Petherick to show where and when I have accused "AFP of being under the control of some other agency."

How bad do you have to be when even a newspaper founded by Holocaust deniers won't have you? And does the AFP even have any other reporters? I have never heard of any.

Don't forget to check out the picture of Bollyn and everyone's favorite BYU professor.

14 Comments:

At 11 October, 2006 08:38, Blogger MarkyX said...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 
At 11 October, 2006 10:07, Blogger Pepik said...

Reading through this story, I realised something. You know what all this truthiness infighting stuff reminds me of?

Pro wrestling. Am I right?

 
At 11 October, 2006 10:17, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Petherick implies that I have submitted false stories. I have, therefore, asked him to clarify exactly which stories of mine were factually incorrect."

It'd probably be easier to list the ones that were actually factually correct. Assuming there were any.

 
At 11 October, 2006 10:25, Blogger MarkyX said...

The list would be a lot shorter burke.

 
At 11 October, 2006 11:44, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST!!!

The Nutbard will soon begin to eat their own.

 
At 11 October, 2006 12:06, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

I am going to say little right now, as I am savouring the moment like a good wine.

TAM

 
At 11 October, 2006 12:26, Blogger Dean Malenko Eats Dogs said...

No, pepik. Pro-wrestling builds to the eventual blow-off match where the greatest is left standing in their glory.

These folks haven't even gotten to curtain jerker stage yet.

 
At 11 October, 2006 12:48, Blogger shawn said...

Do you smeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel what the Rock is cookin'?

 
At 11 October, 2006 14:05, Blogger SFC B said...

So if Bollyn now working for Rense? That letter was Bollyn's "press release" about his firing.

These people are pathetic.

 
At 11 October, 2006 14:13, Blogger SFC B said...

I actually reread the "article" and I didn't notice originally that Bollyn himself wrote the article. Which is truly bizarre since through the entire article he refers to himself in the third person.

 
At 11 October, 2006 14:29, Blogger James B. said...

LOL I didn't notice that either. That is the same thing he did in the AFP article about how he was beaten by Zionist cops. Maybe he has multiple personalities?

 
At 11 October, 2006 15:09, Blogger Triterope said...

So if Bollyn now working for Rense?

Rense will print anything. They have no standards whatsoever. It says so in their own disclaimer at the bottom of the front page. They are the conspiracy theory equivalent of shovelware.

They probably just saw "Christopher Bollyn" and "American Free Press" and ran it without looking any closer.

Here's the question I have: does it really mean anything that Bollyn was "fired" from AFP? I mean, did he lose a steady salary he was living on, or is this firing just a bunch of Internet drama?

 
At 11 October, 2006 19:53, Blogger Bubbers said...

CHEERS!

 
At 03 December, 2006 20:27, Blogger dilbert_g said...

It's easy enough to criticize Zionism based on what they actually said and what they have actually done and from various Jewish critics including Noam Chomsky (on a limited basis), Norm Finkelstein, both very conservative in their critiques, as well as Victor Ostrovsky, and Ari Ben Menasche (two former Mossad agents) and many other authors and professors critical of Zionist aims and actions, and the actions of Mossad. It's not necessary for an a critic of Zionism to be pro-Fascist like Bollyn, AFP, Barnes Review, and others.

This is the circus that Fintan Dunne referred to as "CIA Fakes", a loose term I generally came to agree with when these whackos were getting on my nerves. Dunne actually predicted this "meltdown". (Well, Alex Jones actually predicted the USG would stage fake terror attacks and blame it on Bin Laden in July 2001.)
Then Dunne stayed out of the fray for a while while a dozen or so people on his forum debated it and waited for more hilarious developments and mud-throwing -- which arrived on time.

You guys must understand why mixing up this bullshit with legit questions (and glaring anomalies) about 9-11 is so destructive, and ostensibly serves an "Operation Mockingbird" purpose in terms of making it ALL look LOONY by association. (Setting these goofs aside, there are some glaring contradictions, most prominent in my mind that the former National Security Advisor created Al-Qaeda (mujahideen) to foment terrorism, is proud of it, would do it all again, and is has launched a project called ACPC engaged with Al-Qaeda operations in oil-rich ... for peace. Do you believe Brzezinski's story that he and former CIA Woolsey and AEI members and neo-liberal Jamestown Fd. members are just peace activists in Chechnya?)
Google
ACPC members

It seems to be the case that all these 9-11 Truthiness activists come out with some kind of legit info but then (speaking of controlled demolition) engage in various forms of self-immolation.

Another example of this circus I saw recently was a wonderful talk (on You Tube) by Alex Jones on P2OG, in which he holds up these Pentagon documents and describes them accurately as reported in MSM as a plan by Rumsfeld to promote terrorism to prevent terrorism, but then after 10 minutes of that realism and geopolitics, he frames this as an "Illuminati agenda". The viewer would have to be familiar with other discussions by Jones to understand that "Illuminati" refers primarily to Global Banking, Global "Trade" Councils, and Intelligence Orgs as well as Old Aristocrat Families and the G8 org. Et Cetera.

In other words, he is referring to the same "non-spooky" movement for global economic and political domination by unelected councils representing trans-nat corporations that was protested in Seattle in 1999 by THOUSANDS of liberal and conservative activists, members of clergy, trade unions, hippies, regular folks, everyone --- and which was infiltrated by "anarchists" who were provided with public housing.

Heck, even the rabid neocon hero "Swift Boat" author Jerome Corsi is opposed to this NAFTA Highway with Mexico and Canada. Same thing. But it's hard to tell what's going on when GOOFS are talking about it.
www.Takeoverworld.info

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home