Monday, November 20, 2006

Bond, James Bond

Uhh, guys, it is a movie!

Now I have always been a big fan of my namesake, except for the fact that I am not tall, good looking, British, or a spy, I think I have a lot in common with the character, but this is taking it too far. The truthers are going crazy because the newest Bond movie, Casino Royale, has a passing 9/11 conspiracy reference:

The movie contains a significant reference to 9/11 when M, the fictional head of MI6, tells Bond the following:

"When they analyzed the stock market after 9/11 the CIA discovered there had been massive shorting of airline stocks. When the stocks hit bottom on 9/12, somebody made a fortune."

In the film, Bond prevents the same thing happening again with the Boeing stock, by thwarting the bombing of an airbus prototype plane at Miami airport. With their prototype destroyed the company would have been near bankruptcy. Instead, someone (we later discover it's Le Chiffre) loses over a hundred million dollars betting the wrong way as Bond foils the plot.

Well first of all, the stocks didn't hit bottom on 9/12, the markets were closed for another week. And secondly, have you seen how Airbus is doing lately? You don't need to be a terrorist to short Airbus, and go long on Boeing. But then again, I am from Seattle....

10 Comments:

At 21 November, 2006 04:27, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Script writer for this movie knows more about 9/11 then you, Jimmy boy.

 
At 21 November, 2006 06:41, Blogger Nyke said...

Wow, if it's on the internet, it must be true.

 
At 21 November, 2006 07:58, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Its the equivalent of a written contract for a hitman...they dont exist.

the man is nuts

TAM

 
At 21 November, 2006 08:13, Blogger Jujigatami said...

As for the original premise, I personally know a few people (relatives actually) that right after 9/11 were trying to figure out what stocks to buy and sell to make the biggest profits.

They weren't in on any conspiracy, they just wanted to cash in on a tragedy. I have no doubt that there weren't millions of others doing the same.

By the way, their theory was to buy airline stocks when they tanked assuming that they would always come back. They also invested in some military and security contractors. No conspiracy there, just logic. My cousin invested in some personal security company that made parachutes for people in skyscrapers. He took a bath on that one.

 
At 21 November, 2006 09:16, Blogger Jujigatami said...

Man Apathoid, I read through that JREF thread and my brain hurts.

I can't wait to see all of this "Evidence".

Its already the most convoluted shit possible, it can only get worse.

As I understand his theory, it seems that all of the physical evidence and witnesses concur with the official story, and confirm AA77 flightpath in to the Pentagon. So he has some new super secret evidence that shows that the flightpath was different, so therefore all physical evidence and eyewitnesses must be planted. Ergo, the whole story is false.

I can't seem ti figure out why, if the flightpath of the plane was as he states, the government would make it look like the flightpath was slightly different. How does that help the conspiracy?

 
At 21 November, 2006 09:30, Blogger Manny said...

The Script writer for this movie knows more about 9/11 then you, Jimmy boy.

Is it your contention that the market opened or trades settled in the US on 9-12?

 
At 21 November, 2006 09:38, Blogger Unknown said...

The real scary thing is these people are loose on the street. I love all these claims, what I would like to see from the whaks are the details of how all their claims could have been done.
I wonder what their experience with aircraft crashes is? I wonder which ones any of them has investigated?

 
At 21 November, 2006 11:31, Blogger The Masked Writer said...

official story, and confirm AA77 flightpath in to the Pentagon

The NTSB's flight data does not match the official story of AA77. The altitude is to
Perhaps someone should debunk the governments own findings.
From the experts:
The aircraft is too high, even for the official released video of the 5 frames where you see something cross the Pentagon Lawn at level attitude. The 5 frames of video captured by the parking gate cam is in direct conflict with the Aircraft Flight Data Recorder information released by the NTSB. More information will be forthcoming as we come to our conclusions on each issue. We have contacted the NTSB regarding the conflict between the official story and the FDR. They refuse to comment.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html

 
At 21 November, 2006 12:57, Blogger Jujigatami said...

Public Service for all the truthers that read and post here.

I was just at a place called "Sur Le Table" Its an upscale kitchen store (Like Williams Sonoma). They have REAL TIN FOIL! Not the Aluminum junk that doesn't actually keep the mind control rays out, but the real stuff!

Hurry down or order online before the NWO Illuminatti remove it from their shelves forever!

Sure, its expensive, but isn't your brain worth it?

 
At 21 November, 2006 15:43, Blogger Manny said...

But of course to the Nutbar Tin Foil Hat community this is sure sign that the government is involved in a cover up.

Even better, a perceived or real minor discrepancy between the on-board data documenting a crash and all the other data documenting a crash means there was, of course, no crash.

Retards.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home