Thursday, December 28, 2006

More Evidence for the Star Wars Beam

Put together by our old buddy Spooked.

This picture, for some reason really made me wonder, what happened to the North wall of WTC1?


You know, I do believe some of it collided with WTC 7.

23 Comments:

At 28 December, 2006 23:22, Blogger lawchick said...

What a stark raving lunatic "spooked" is. Did he run out of rabbit cages to play with or what?

 
At 29 December, 2006 05:37, Blogger PhilBiker said...

His conclusion:

The only possible explanation is that the wall was disintegrated as WTC1 came down.

Translated:

I AM A STARK RAVING LUNATIC!

 
At 29 December, 2006 05:42, Blogger default.xbe said...

What a stark raving lunatic "spooked" is. Did he run out of rabbit cages to play with or what?

yesh, he used up all his chicken wire in hsi last experiment where he proved the entire section above the impact could have fallen halfway over and stayed at a 90 degree angle sticking out from the rest of the tower hanging on by one wall of perimeter columns

 
At 29 December, 2006 06:28, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Having an intelligent discussion about 9/11 seems to be beyond the temperament of most commenters here.

If any of the claims concerning the destruction of the Towers from the truthers have merit, immediate and startling questions that arise concern how NIST and professional structural engineers would fail to come forward.

If order to argue how an entire society could be so corrupted, I believe it is reasonable to post web links that relate to the overall political situation.


Illegal Procedure: The Quick and the Dead

 
At 29 December, 2006 06:43, Blogger Manny said...

The only possible explanation is that the wall was disintegrated as WTC1 came down.

Here's what I don't get. Assume, for the moment, that these guys aren't on Osama's payroll -- that they actually have a good-faith belief in the crap they say. Then how do they survive? How does a guy like that not poison himself with household chemicals or get taken weekly by con men or run his car into a canal? How can a guy given to leaps of logic like that hold a job or get a mortgage or sustain a relationship?

 
At 29 December, 2006 07:10, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another example of the Bush Admin promoting science:

Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees.

 
At 29 December, 2006 07:28, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

douchbag troll laying more bait.

 
At 29 December, 2006 07:29, Blogger Lying_Dylan said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 29 December, 2006 07:30, Blogger 911coverup said...

Network of corruption

 
At 29 December, 2006 07:40, Blogger Manny said...

Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees.

Geologic formations such as gneiss and schist found at the bottom of the Canyon date back 1,800 million years.

 
At 29 December, 2006 07:48, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lying_Dylan said...

douchbag troll laying more bait.


Am I the only one that does know what you are talking about LD? What bait am I laying and what am I trying to catch?

 
At 29 December, 2006 07:53, Blogger default.xbe said...

911coverup said...
Network of corruption


wasted money + favoritism = SPACE LASERS!

its so obvious now!

 
At 29 December, 2006 08:21, Blogger shawn said...

My goodness, the Bush Administration isn't pro-science? God, BG tell me something I didn't know.

Funny thing, that's proof the NIST and others aren't in his pocket. Their science is sound.

 
At 29 December, 2006 09:16, Blogger Alex said...

From the "article":

The only conceivable explanation is that, indeed, some high-energy weapon disintegrated the steel as it fell, at the same time making huge holes in WTC6.

I absolutely love statements like that. He states it as if it's the most logical thing in the world. Really makes you marvel at the crap that the human mind can come up with.

 
At 29 December, 2006 09:16, Blogger Alex said...

My goodness, the Bush Administration isn't pro-science?

Neither are BG and the rest of the kooks. You figure they'd absolutely adore Bush....

 
At 29 December, 2006 09:23, Blogger CHF said...

Having an intelligent discussion about 9/11 seems to be beyond the temperament of most commenters here.

Yeah let's have an intelligent discussion about how laser beams from space destroyed the WTC.

 
At 29 December, 2006 09:33, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

Bait - Truther link
Catch - conversion of the naive
Method - Spamming someone else website

Please, I beg of you BG, give it up. Debate all you want,but my god man, stop the spamming.

TA<

 
At 29 December, 2006 10:00, Blogger CHF said...

If any of the claims concerning the destruction of the Towers from the truthers have merit, immediate and startling questions that arise concern how NIST and professional structural engineers would fail to come forward.

Your moronic claims don't have merit - thus no structural engineers have come forward.

There - that wasn't so complicated, was it?

 
At 29 December, 2006 10:01, Blogger James B. said...

If order to argue how an entire society could be so corrupted, I believe it is reasonable to post web links that relate to the overall political situation.


BG, let's be serious. Has there ever been any time when you did not consider it reasonable to post links on any subject?

 
At 29 December, 2006 12:24, Blogger Stevew said...

How could anyone have an intelligeht disscusion about spooked? The guy is totally batshit.
How about a detailed explaination to back up their claims and back it up with real experts and scientific evidence that is equal to what has been put fourth by the real experts? No opinions.

Perhaps then we could have a debate but the toofers have yet to put fourth anything but mindless babble

 
At 29 December, 2006 19:05, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

That old "Star Wars beam"!

I have a theory!

Chewbacca did it!

Yeah! That's the ticket!

 
At 29 December, 2006 19:09, Anonymous Anonymous said...

James B. said...

If order to argue how an entire society could be so corrupted, I believe it is reasonable to post web links that relate to the overall political situation.


BG, let's be serious. Has there ever been any time when you did not consider it reasonable to post links on any subject?


I would say, "I'm sorry you feel that way", except you are expressing a thought rather than a feeling, so I'll say,

"I'll sorry you think that".

 
At 30 December, 2006 08:46, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

So here is a question. The Star Wars Beam in question, is it from Episode IV's Death Star, or from Episode VI's?

TAM

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home