Why The Hustler Stories?
That's what one blogger asks:
Hustler magazine's latest issue devotes its lead article ("Was 9/11 An Inside Job?") to "new scientific evidence" that the destruction of the WTC towers was an inside job. This evidence from university and industry scientists and engineers, while certainly not "new" in journalistic terms, suggests the towers were likely brought down by controlled demolition.
Hustler's effort comes almost exactly one year after Maxim's considerably longer and more indepth feature of March 2006, which asks "What Really Brought Down the Towers?"
What's going on here? Why has the most important media exposure for the 9/11 Truth Movement come from vehicles for male masturbatory fantasies, locker and bathroom humor, and Charlie Sheen?
It's pretty easy to understand, actually. Hustler is aimed squarely at young white males of below average intelligence. This, of course, is the overwhelming demographic making up the 9-11 Denial movement.
posted by Pat @ 8:10 AM
8 comments
8 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
I agree that a magazine run by a piece of shit like Larry Flynt, and published only so that adult males can ogle the tits of loose women is definitely the source for important scientific findings on the 9/11 attacks.
Yep. That's definitely the ticket.
and the comment from PDoh about us being jealous is coming in 3....2....1....
TAM
Pdoh is obviously TAM's puppet...
Is there a single truther that sits back for a minute and thinks in the back of his head:
"Hmm, even with all of this evidence the best we can do is Hustler? Maybe I'm wrong about a few things..."
Yea, Like I buy Hustler for its indepth scientific articles.
[/sarcasm]
Like hey man, "young white males of below average intelligence", like Jason?
Boxcutters ha ha ha ha
"Hmm, even with all of this evidence the best we can do is Hustler? Maybe I'm wrong about a few things..."
No, the CTs would probably argue that the lack of mainstream media coverage proves that the story is being suppressed.
Of course, whenever conspiracy theory does get mainstream media coverage, they consider their beliefs validated.
Such is CT logic. It's all a big game of "heads I win, tails you lose."
Post a Comment
<< Home