Sunday, January 28, 2007

Why The Hustler Stories?

That's what one blogger asks:

Hustler magazine's latest issue devotes its lead article ("Was 9/11 An Inside Job?") to "new scientific evidence" that the destruction of the WTC towers was an inside job. This evidence from university and industry scientists and engineers, while certainly not "new" in journalistic terms, suggests the towers were likely brought down by controlled demolition.

Hustler's effort comes almost exactly one year after Maxim's considerably longer and more indepth feature of March 2006, which asks "What Really Brought Down the Towers?"

What's going on here? Why has the most important media exposure for the 9/11 Truth Movement come from vehicles for male masturbatory fantasies, locker and bathroom humor, and Charlie Sheen?


It's pretty easy to understand, actually. Hustler is aimed squarely at young white males of below average intelligence. This, of course, is the overwhelming demographic making up the 9-11 Denial movement.

12 Comments:

At 28 January, 2007 08:47, Blogger CHF said...

Why has the most important media exposure for the 9/11 Truth Movement come from vehicles for male masturbatory fantasies, locker and bathroom humor, and Charlie Sheen?

Cuz that's all the twoof movement is worth.

Any more questions?

 
At 28 January, 2007 09:56, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

"Hustler is aimed squarely at young white males of below average intelligence."

Yeah cos black men and older men dont masturbate.

What crap are you talking

 
At 28 January, 2007 10:15, Blogger dman said...

I only buy HUSTLER for the stimulating articles.......

 
At 28 January, 2007 15:26, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 28 January, 2007 15:27, Blogger Simon Lazarus said...

I agree that a magazine run by a piece of shit like Larry Flynt, and published only so that adult males can ogle the tits of loose women is definitely the source for important scientific findings on the 9/11 attacks.

Yep. That's definitely the ticket.

 
At 28 January, 2007 18:07, Blogger The Artistic Macrophage said...

and the comment from PDoh about us being jealous is coming in 3....2....1....

TAM

 
At 28 January, 2007 18:14, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

Tam I would never wish to dissappoint you.

This is a clear case of jealousy

 
At 28 January, 2007 19:07, Blogger Cl1mh4224rd said...

Pdoh is obviously TAM's puppet...

 
At 28 January, 2007 19:37, Blogger Richard said...

Is there a single truther that sits back for a minute and thinks in the back of his head:

"Hmm, even with all of this evidence the best we can do is Hustler? Maybe I'm wrong about a few things..."

 
At 28 January, 2007 20:34, Blogger RolandofGilead said...

Yea, Like I buy Hustler for its indepth scientific articles.

[/sarcasm]

 
At 29 January, 2007 20:19, Blogger Avery Dylan said...

Like hey man, "young white males of below average intelligence", like Jason?

Boxcutters ha ha ha ha

 
At 30 January, 2007 14:12, Blogger Triterope said...

"Hmm, even with all of this evidence the best we can do is Hustler? Maybe I'm wrong about a few things..."

No, the CTs would probably argue that the lack of mainstream media coverage proves that the story is being suppressed.

Of course, whenever conspiracy theory does get mainstream media coverage, they consider their beliefs validated.

Such is CT logic. It's all a big game of "heads I win, tails you lose."

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home