9-11 Blogger Can't Handle the Truth!
Well, is this a bit of hilarious Stalinism from the "Truthers" over at 9-11 Blogger, or what? One of the bloggers over at TruthMove.org created a post at 9-11 Blogger about Eric D. Williams, the Holocaust Denier who's running the 9-11 Accountability Conference. It certainly generated a lot of attention, with something like 50 replies. But... you probably guessed it, it's been disappeared. Possibly by edict of Commissar Reprehensor?
Update: The post has reappeared.
Update II: My apologies to 9-11 Blogger and Reprehensor. We have seen the Loose Change board frequently remove posts from their forum on many occasions and I assumed that was what happened here. Nico gives a possible explanation in the comments that seems logical.
Labels: 9-11 Blogger, Stalinism
posted by Pat @ 7:41 PM
21 comments
21 Comments:
The post was probably just undated. From my time at 911Blogger, if you changed your blog IN ANY WAY after posting, it had to be re-submitted for approval which might take up to 24 hours.
No need to look for conspiracy theories on this one...
Wow, we have backers? Who knew? I was also amused by the guy suggesting we were coordinating with CNN. Yeah, I have Paula Zahn on my speed dial...
This post from that thread caught my eye. Best thing I've seen come from the twoofers for quite a while:
Have you noticed a pattern of one after another seemingly legitimate 911 spokesman rising to represent this movement - only to later be exposed as crazy or racist?
Morgan Reynolds - seemed normal at first. Jim Fetzer - seemed normal at first. Judy Woods - seemed normal at first. Rick Siegel - seemed normal at first. One after another these people emerge from nowhere only to later suddenly advocate no planes, space beams, mini nukes, holocaust denial, etc.
Even Kevin Barret concerns me in that he wrote an editorial asking us to not dismiss the "space beams" theory - and his position in this movement as an "islamic studies professor" makes him ideal to scapegoat this movement.
and - the pattern is EVERY TIME that people will insist that these people represent our best interests.
its like wack-a-mole at the amusement park. wack one mole and another jumps up in its place.
Submitted by John Albanese on Thu, 02/01/2007 - 6:18pm.
Unfortunately, he goes on to blame this on "disinfo agents", instead of making the logical connection - that his movement is full of people who are fucking nuts. But it's still a good post.
Eat something you scrawny, no plane believin',douchefart.
I'm sorry you feel the need for childish insults, but I can understand your frustration with "no planes".
I am seriously reconsidering my position here, and I know I've caused many fellow truthers no end of grief. I've already said this on my blog, but briefly: over the last couple of years stress from relationships and finances have affected my judgement, and not for the best. I'm trying to rebuild bridges, so to speak.
However if you wish to continue with pointless invectives, that is your perogative.
Please cool it, Troy.
Well, Troy, as you admit your words are pointless, I see no reason to respond to you further until you adopt a more civilized demeanor.
I see no reason to respond to you further until you adopt a more civilized demeanor.
This coming from someone who thinks that all of the people who saw planes on 9/11 are payed off, lying, dis-info agents, whatever. Maybe if you were more civilized then people wouldn't say rude things to you.
Richard, you are quite right--and that is why I've posted an appology to 911Blogger on my blog, among other things.
http://ewing2001.blogspot.com/
I realize it will take a while for some to be convinced this is a new me. But that does not mean I need to waste time responding to those who just enjoy distruption.
My apologies to 9-11 Blogger and Reprehensor.
I don't think you need to go easy on them. They make commenters "disappear", they are quite Stalinist.
sorry to disappoint you guys, but this "ewing2001" is an imposter, just compare the IPs at blogger, thx ;
http://www.blogger.com/profile/17007365692023636720
isn't me
i am
http://www.blogger.com/profile/09950338309594936880
but nice try, perps anyway ;)
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=2724
http://www.911bloglines.com/aggregator/sources/1
February 3, 2007
Some clown imposters as "ewing2001blogspot.com"
By ewing2001
picked up at:
http://ewing2001.blogspot.com/
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2007/02/9-11-blogger-cant-handle-truth.html
https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27396
9-11 Blogger Can't Handle the Truth!
ewing2001 said...
sorry to disappoint you guys, but this "ewing2001" is an imposter, just compare the IPs at blogger, thx ;
http://www.blogger.com/profile/17007365692023636720
isn't me
i am
http://www.blogger.com/profile/09950338309594936880
but nice try, perps anyway ;)
02 February, 2007 22:23
Delete
and obviously people around 911blogger.com wanna stop this:
http://www.bloglines.com/preview?siteid=6120684&itemid=2685
NYC: 3 Local TV Hosts block decision on TV Debate ny911-Jamieson vs. Haupt reg. Urantia
By ewing2001
...
Scumbags like John Albanese started a legal defense fund to stop this ;)
http://www.bloglines.com/preview?siteid=6120684&itemid=2709
Slandering John Albanese announced "911 Truth Legal Defense Fund" against "Slander"
Needless to say, no apology to dz, especially on the satire at
http://911bloggerss2008.blog.com/
http://www.bloglines.com/preview?siteid=6120684&itemid=2608
9/11 Lies: Peters/Floum Clan continues to ban and censor at 911blogger.com
By ewing2001
"...I am seriously reconsidering my position here, and I know I've caused many fellow truthers no end of grief. ..."
not my style of screwed up english either.
Maybe Albanese is waiting for his first case for his silly "legal fund", possibly sponsored by his hero Ruppert, who is back in NYC ;)
The "Whack a Mole" line Albanese tries to make his own is stolen. It was used by "conspiracy theory" debunkers originally, to express in a supposedly humorous way their frustration, since all of the evidence is on the side of the government skeptics. They were having trouble since their theory has no integrity while ours does.
And look who is "good for the movement?"
Albanese should write for "Screw Loose Change" he gets such a high approval rating with them!
Albanese is a guy along the lines of Lieberman for the Democrats, or "Snitchens" - Christopher Hitchens, for the Progressives: By his writing and point of view you can't even tell he belongs on the side he's supposedly supports.
since all of the evidence is on the side of the government skeptics.
Really? What "evidence" would that be?
You know... I thought Nico was sounding way too lucid there for a minute...
Ha! I guessed right -- and just for the reason you cite, Nico. You have your own special way with the English language and the imposter just couldn't pull off an effective simulation.
I think the problem here is that Blogger uses your posting name and not your login name for comments. There can only be one login for Ewing2001 but any number of people can use that as their posting name, just as probably hundreds post as "Pat" and "Rob".
Rob, how hard are you guys looking to find out when he published the book? Unfortunately the Wayback Machine doesn't seem to have any option for checking 2006 dates.
Matrka is a moron.
Would you people stop calling yourselves skeptics? You're pseudoskeptics. There's no evidence for your side.
And the people who label themselves "progressives" aren't progressive and the self-label is a preemptive poisoning of the well against opponents.
And it's funny you attack one of the most brilliant voices on the War on Terror - Christopher Hitchens. As I've stated earlier, you obviously aren't bright.
Ha! I guessed right -- and just for the reason you cite, Nico. You have your own special way with the English language and the imposter just couldn't pull off an effective simulation.
it is actually much simpler than that, casseia; i wanted to be clear and so i got friends to help. it seemed too important.
not my style of screwed up english either.
and so he admits he screws up on purpose while i try to improve to help communicate better.
as i have said, this is one of the others who still have access to the old account.
next time i will have more help--i do not like the way this looks!
Post a Comment
<< Home