Yet Moron Eric Williams & 9-11 Accountability
Our buddy The Bird has more on this "Shoah-shirker" at his blog.
Williams dismisses as “total nonsense” the gassing of Jews at Auschwitz. He refers to Auschwitz as a “reconstructed theme park,” and in a particularly repugnant chapter, states that he does not believe the so-called Operation Reinhard camps of Sobibor, Treblinka and Belzec ever existed.
Excellent stuff with a little deeper detail than he could put into the New Times piece. Meanwhile, some of the 9-11 Deniers are apparently scrambling to distance themselves from this conference, according to this post from a CT at Democratic Underground.
I'm even going to grant you that those are indeed a few of the current "biggest names" among 9/11 CTs, though I hear many of them are not actually going to Arizona. Insofar as they didn't figure out who Eric D. Williams was in advance of accepting a speaking opportunity, that's in my book almost as bad as knowing. People should be able to google whoever they're dealing with and not enter into such "compromises." At any rate, look for most of those speakers not to even show.
Hmmm, sounds like some of these 9-11 Deniers have more sense than the ACLU of Arizona.
Update: Charles Goyette, Phoenix radio talk show host, drops from the speaker list.
Labels: 9-11 Accountability, Eric D. Williams, Holocaust Denial
posted by Pat @ 12:38 PM
22 comments
22 Comments:
It seems to me that you have some of the most disgusting subhumans in the leftwing movements - the Troothers, the neo-Nazis (who get a lot of respect from the left), the Holocaust Deniers (in league with Mahmoudy of Iran), and other thugs.
On the right you have David Duke and Pat Buchanan, but they seem to have moved left, because today they are anti-Semitic AND anti-war.
Someone needs to write a book about just how far the left has gone in the tinfoil hattery arena.
they seem to have moved left, because today they are anti-Semitic AND anti-war.
I don't think that makes them left wing, that just makes them politically savvy.
On the right you have David Duke and Pat Buchanan, but they seem to have moved left, because today they are anti-Semitic AND anti-war.
In fairness (ugh) to Buchanan, he's long been an isolationist. He's against pretty much any war that doesn't involve Mexicans crossing the border.
Grats on the LGF link, get ready for some mondo traffic.
I think that extremists on both sides of the political spectrum make up the bulk of the 911 truth movement. And who attacked us on 911? Islamic extremists. I believe that all 3 groups want to see western society fail. Some attack verbally, others use deadly force, and some use both. All three want to employ their own warped view of the world and are bonded in only in that aspect, although their vision of the world is completely different.
I think liberals, moderates, and conservatives, while all sharing different points of view, want western society to succeed and see right through this farce called the "truth movement."
I think liberals, moderates, and conservatives, while all sharing different points of view, want western society to succeed and see right through this farce called the "truth movement."
Bingo.
The political spectrum is more a loop than a line. At both "ends" (practically the same point on the loop) are the antifreedom, racist folks.
In jew ruled USA, I am a foreigner in the nation my fathers founded.
I wonder why this one hates the US so much.
Maybe he is mad because his father lost his job as a guard at Treblinka.
john samhain, I don't have to say another word--you proved my point with your extremist dissertation.
Nice John. What will you be giving us for your next performance, a reinactment of the holocaust?
You are a racist creep
TAM (A caucasian with no ill will to the jewish community)
The founding fathers are our fathers, most of us Americans still share our genes with them (Scotch, Irish, Welsh, or English and mixes of the four)
Actually, the Scots-Irish came quite a while after the gounding.
But yeah, it's a shame we're a melting pot instead of "racially pure", eh?
One of your Nazi brothers link you here?
The founding fathers are our fathers, most of us Americans still share our genes with them (Scotch, Irish, Welsh, or English and mixes of the four), and there was not a hooknosed jew amongst them. Their national ideal is our ideal. The government they created can not be passed on to another ethnicity.
For your information, mister racist anti-Semite scumbag, The founders had no hostility towards Jews. In fact Jefferson wanted the seal of the US to be of the Jews leaving Egypt, and considered Americans the new Jews. A passage from the Torah is on the liberty bell. Why don't you go crawl back under the rock you came from.
I never thought I'd see it, but this idiot is worse than Pdoh.
John, if the Anglo-Saxon race is so pure, why do you think it's hyphenated? Does it just contain too much glorious racial purity for one word to handle?
"the neo-Nazis (who get a lot of respect from the left)"
I would be interested to know what evidence you have for this, simon. I've never met a liberal who respected a neo-Nazi.
I was unaware that mearly not knowing and not praising in the magnificence that is the jew while European is "Nazism".
I think the 'hookednose' bit and rants about racial purity may just have something to do with the accusation.
So...what're your view on who was behind 9/11?
...neo-Nazis (who get a lot of respect from the left
Can you support this comment with evidence?
Has anyone here actually read William's book?
I'm currently on page 34. The only comment I've found that is troublesome is the themepark reference. He does reference an expert's analysis regarding the use or lack there of of gas at Aushwitz. Interesting read to say the least wether you are a holocaust denier, revisionist, or believer.
Interesting read to say the least whether you are a holocaust denier, revisionist, or believer.
No, not really. I don't consider poorly researched BS fueled by anti-antisemitism as "interesting."
What I do find interesting is how you latch onto things with out even performing the most basic of research into it. What little research you do is only to find information that makes you feel more comfortable in your beliefs. Whenever I hear something absurd or far removed from common sense I tend to do some research to see if it actually BS or not. For example saying that the official account of 9/11 is that jet fuel melted the steel in the towers is a great example of how little research you guys actually perform. That I find interesting.
He does reference an expert's analysis regarding the use or lack there of of gas at Aushwitz.
I do believe you are referring to Frank Leuchter, whom Williams calls "America's leading gas chamber expert".
The problem is, Leuchter is a fake, in the tradition of Karl Schwarz and Lauro Chavez. It took me 5 minutes of research to figure this out, how come none of you guys ever can?
Before being brought to trial on criminal charges of practicing engineering without a license, Leuchter signed a consent agreement on June 12, 1991, admitting that he had misrepresented himself as an engineer, both in letters and proposals to correctional facilities, and in his "Report" on the concentration camp gas chambers. He therefore agreed to cease And desist from using the title "engineer" in connection with his execution equipment and the distribution of his writings.
Rather than retreat in light of these developments, Leuchter singled out Jews for blame over the setbacks his career has suffered. In an IHR flyer titled "Help Fred Leuchter Answer the Crazed Zionist Mob:' Leuchter was quoted as saying, "This witch hunt must and will stop. I give fair warning to all those who are part of this international cabal, to all those who have unjustly attacked me and violated my rights-to the Klarsfelds, Shapiros, and Kahns of the world, Fred Leuchter is coming for you! You will be brought to answer in those same courts and before the same judicial system you have sought to destroy."
http://www.adl.org/issue_holocaust/leuchter-1993.asp
Hey, so I was right in the other thread when I said the guy probably wasn't the leading expert.
For anyone interested in Leuchter, there's a brilliant documentary by the Oscar-winning film-maker Errol Morris called "Mr Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred A Leuchter" which I heartily recommend. Exposes the man and his methods in pitiless detail.
to the person calling Frank a fraud. First of all, Engineering isn't something like medicine, or Law, or whatever, that has a codified body of knowledge, or text that goes with it. Engineering happens to simply be the way things work. A close friend of mine, with no formal education was an electrical expert, because he mind grasped the mathematics that whent along with it. And he could take things apart and put them back together and have learned something in the process. A great many engineers, and even more so, inventors, don't need a liscense to Engineer, or a liscense to invent. Did Thomas edison have formal schooling ? no he did not. But few would argue he was not a qualified engineer, or inventor. And in this same spectrum is where Frank's expert status came into play. He was not some generalized, quack, "engineer" with a liscense Neo-nazis found to serve as expert witness in the trial. he was the ONLY person qualified to serve as an expert witness. He is the inventor of the lethal injection machine, and the designer of the gas chambers used in the United States. How can you liberal fools, question the relevance of the ONLY expert's opinion, ok someone else might be qualified in liscensure to review what Frank had to say, but that was person, still would not be in the same unique position as Frank, with first hand knowledge in, designing, and putting into use, execution equipment. So your full of shit, and yes the bnai brith and ADL spearheaded those whom questioned Frank's credentials. without looking at the big picture, you try to deflect the accuracy of Frank's knowledge, the truth of his convictions and the reality of the jewish conspiracy's lies, you deflect and attempt to disarm the truth.
And another thing. I am a RIGHT WING extremist and a neo-nazi, cuss its the same thing, neo's and right wingers are one and the same. Look at Obama's fbi list of domestic terror suspects, one page has the right wing, and the other the left. the Right is Neo-nazis, anti-abortion, christian religious extremists, and survivalists, because they are the real right wing. Neo-conservatism, is in the strain of big government, and trostkyist notions of "spreading the revolution" and bringing the benefits of "democracy" to the world through force if need be.
Post a Comment
<< Home