Thursday, January 14, 2010

Another Prominent Truther Arrested

Former weapons inspector, and truther (here is his profile on PatriotsQuestion911) Scott Ritter was arrested in yet another sting for exposing himself to a federal agent posing as a 15 year-old girl. Geez, at least Charlie Sheen only abuses women over the age of 18.

Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter was arrested in a Pennsylvania sex sting in November on a litany of charges involving a lewd Internet conversation with a person he thought was a 15-year-old girl.

Ritter, 48, allegedly masturbated in front of a Web camera while he was engaged in conversation in an Internet chat room with an undercover cop posing as the teenage girl. He declined to discuss the charges Thursday when reporters visited his New York residence.



OK, so technically he isn't a full blown truther, he is "just asking questions" but that is what Jon Gold insists is the definition of a truther.

31 Comments:

At 14 January, 2010 18:43, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Ritter, 48, allegedly masturbated in front of a Web camera while he was engaged in conversation in an Internet chat room with an undercover cop posing as the teenage girl.

Masturbating in front of a computer is par for the course for "truther" sex lives.

It's a shame that Ritter is this fucked up, since he was right about Iraq and WMDs.

 
At 14 January, 2010 19:01, Blogger Jaye said...

and what's worse is that this ain't the first time he's been caught doing this.

 
At 14 January, 2010 19:27, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Former chief United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter...."

Gee, do you think at some point in his career he was the perfect subject for blackmail?

 
At 14 January, 2010 19:37, Anonymous Prince Uday Was Next in Line said...

"It's a shame that Ritter is this fucked up, since he was right about Iraq and WMDs"

No, what's a shame is Saddam tried to play a bluff against us over his "own" people.

Why don't we call down to hell and ask him how that turned out?

 
At 14 January, 2010 19:48, Blogger Triterope said...

he is "just asking questions"

Yeah... he's asking "A/S/L?"

 
At 14 January, 2010 19:52, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

This joker is looking at some serious time. I'd hate to be his lawyer facing the prosecutor in the plea deal. It will be very difficult to say with a straight face "He will never, never, never, never do it again."

 
At 14 January, 2010 20:01, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

From the BBC -

"If found guilty, (ADA) Mr Rakaczewski said, the former weapons inspector could face up to seven years in jail."

Bwaaahhhaaaaaa!

"Officials say they traced the exchange using a mobile phone he gave them, reports say."

Did this fucking secret agent guy not watch the second season of The Wire?

Was this omniscient mastermind outsmarted by his fucking cellphone?

 
At 14 January, 2010 20:11, Anonymous Patrick from Cincinnati said...

Heh - if anyone here listens to O&A -

I wouldn't say Scott Ritter "likes" teenage girls ... I would say he LOOOOOOOVVVVVVES them!

 
At 14 January, 2010 21:12, Blogger pdoherty76 said...

What exactly is your point Pat?

Why haven't you reported the actions of debukers like Troy?

This blog is getting worse. Do you know how many non-truthers have been arrested for what Ritter did?

 
At 14 January, 2010 21:29, Anonymous New Yorker said...

No, what's a shame is Saddam tried to play a bluff against us over his "own" people.

Why don't we call down to hell and ask him how that turned out?


What?

 
At 14 January, 2010 21:42, Anonymous Troofers R Fools said...

"This blog is getting worse. Do you know how many non-truthers have been arrested for what Ritter did?"

This ISN'T troofers vs. "non-truthers" you fucking toad!

It's DEBUNKERS vs. troofers and I can't wait to show me a debunker who killed his father or a debunker who jerks off in front of 15 year old girls.

"Why haven't you reported the actions of debukers like Troy?"

He has you lazy dumbfuck!

 
At 14 January, 2010 21:45, Anonymous Qusay Was The Less Insane One said...

"What?"

Weeks later, the Washington Post offered a more elaborate version of the theory (10/1/03), arguing that


Hussein may have put in place a double-deception program aimed at convincing the world and his own people that he was more of a threat than he actually was. This included moving equipment and personnel, and making public statements all designed to make the world and his own people believe that they had weapons of mass destruction.


This theory, advanced by CIA weapons inspector David Kay in his October 2 preliminary report to Congress, was reported widely in the media. U.S. News & World Report (10/13/03), under the headline “Was It All a Big Bluff by Saddam?” reported that “U.S. officials appear to have been taken in by attempts by Saddam to dupe his own regional enemies like Iran into believing he retained some sort of capability.”

Though Kay’s endorsement gave it new life, that theory had been floating around for some time: An Associated Press report (8/1/03) put it this way: “Intelligence officials at the Pentagon, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said some experts had raised the theory that Iraq put out false information to persuade its enemies that it retained prohibited chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs.”

 
At 14 January, 2010 22:31, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"Do you know how many non-truthers have been arrested for what Ritter did?"

Wow, bet you don't even get how stupid that statement is. Logic not big with you, is it?

Considering that non-truther population would be 99.5% of the American population I would guess the number would be very large.

Considering so few people are truthers, .5% or so, Ritter and Sheen sure show the low life nature of trutherloons.

 
At 14 January, 2010 23:51, Anonymous John E. Smoke said...

Isn't there an insanity plea in this somewhere? He is a Truther, after all.

 
At 15 January, 2010 00:12, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You really have to be an idiot to think that two steel and concrete skyscapers could both forcfully explode outwardly into dust in exactly the same manner after being hit by two aluminum airplanes at different speeds, at different angles and at different places - all at free-fall no less; and you also have to be an idiot to think that building seven could implode because of fires.

 
At 15 January, 2010 00:21, Blogger Billman said...

You really have to be an idiot to think that two steel and concrete skyscapers could both forcfully explode outwardly into dust in exactly the same manner after being hit by two aluminum airplanes at different speeds, at different angles and at different places - all at free-fall no less;

I agree. Because NONE OF THAT HAPPENED the way you described. And it wouldn't happen that way with explosives either, thermite or otherwise.

and you also have to be an idiot to think that building seven could implode because of fires

Which also isn't what happened...

So yeah, I agree with you. None of those things happened. Welcome to reality.

 
At 15 January, 2010 00:25, Blogger Billman said...

What exactly is your point Pat?

That all 9/11 troofers are murderers/psychos... or will be, the ones that aren't they just currently lack thier motivation.

Why haven't you reported the actions of debukers like Troy?

He has. Check the archives.

So you're saying masturbating in front of girls is justifiable because Troy exists? It's acceptable behaviour because Troy exists? One debunker has turned out to have issues, and that MAKES IT OKAY FOR 9/11 TRUTHERS TO MASTURBATE IN FRONT OF A TEENAGE GIRL?

You sick fucks...

 
At 15 January, 2010 02:41, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear God, I hope Freak Brian Good does not have a Web Camera!! Can you imagine???!!!!

 
At 15 January, 2010 06:02, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Ritter was just inspecting his weapon of mass destruction and didn't realize the camera was on.

 
At 15 January, 2010 06:06, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

"- all at free-fall no less; and you also "

Wow, you mean there is still an idiot who thinks the tower fell at Free Fall? I know none of them are genius material but you would think they could at least count.

 
At 15 January, 2010 06:51, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"...- all at free-fall no less"

Proof positive that you're a booger eating moron:

http://tinyurl.com/yht2dox

Watch the film of the event, and fucking time the fucking collapse.

Oh, and watch the debris as it fall faster than the main building structure.

You, sir, are a fucktard.

Here's a Klue™: the collaspse starts at about the :15 mark.

At the :37 mark (which would be :22 seconds into the collapse, longer than the retarded Twoooofers™ claim for the entire destruction, btw) you can seee a huge section of the towers structure falling to the left.

And eyballing the film, the collaspe ends at approx. :45.

Sol let's dee, :45 minus :15 would be.......

By gum that'd be 30 seconds.

So Twoooofers™ are a collection of insane dunghill denizens.

 
At 15 January, 2010 07:14, Anonymous New Yorker said...

Hussein may have put in place a double-deception program aimed at convincing the world and his own people that he was more of a threat than he actually was.

I'm sure he did. Why he did, who knows (to try to keep Iran and the Kurds at bay?). All I'm saying is that Ritter was right about the WMD program and we should have paid him more attention.

Regardless, he's a scumbag who jerks off in front of 15-year-olds.

 
At 15 January, 2010 08:24, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

"Coming along quite nicely on bass there NY,er"! Did you grow up being taught that Poppy Bush was out of the loop?

 
At 15 January, 2010 08:40, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
"Coming along quite nicely on bass there NY,er"! Did you grow up being taught that Poppy Bush was out of the loop?"

When are you going to learn that ypu hagve no connection to what sane people call "reality", assholio?

 
At 15 January, 2010 10:46, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

PornBoy,you got a dead dick my man.

 
At 15 January, 2010 11:03, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Arhoolie said...
PornBoy,you got a dead dick my man."

Can someone translate that into Sane for me?

 
At 15 January, 2010 11:15, Anonymous Arhoolie said...

Quit slapping everone with it,it's DEAD,man!

 
At 15 January, 2010 14:10, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'It's a shame that Ritter is this fucked up, since he was right about Iraq and WMDs.'

Re: Ritter and UNSCOM, this is the problem. While he was an inspector, he was almost McNulty-esque in his job, and convinced the Iraqis were lying. When he resigned in 1998, he criticised his former bosses for being weak, and said that Iraq was a major threat to world peace. Then - around 1999 - he started talking about how UNSCOM was a front for US, British and Israeli intelligence, and all that Saddam needed was a big warm hug, and he'd give up his WMD programmes. Then - at some point in early 2003 - he started saying that Iraq never had any WMD capability at all after 1991.

AFAIK, at no point has he ever explained why he's changed his position on Iraq more often than the average truther has changed his underwear.

 
At 15 January, 2010 14:13, Anonymous sackcloth and ashes said...

'"Arhoolie said...
PornBoy,you got a dead dick my man."

Can someone translate that into Sane for me?'

Our Walt friend Arsehoolie is just admitting that his life still sucks.

 
At 15 January, 2010 14:46, Anonymous New Yorker said...

AFAIK, at no point has he ever explained why he's changed his position on Iraq more often than the average truther has changed his underwear.

Yeah, it appears the guy is, um, erratic. You're right, it would be interesting to know why he flip-flopped on this question so drastically.

 
At 16 January, 2010 04:49, Blogger Lazarus Long said...

"Yeah, it appears the guy is, um, erratic. You're right, it would be interesting to know why he flip-flopped on this question so drastically."

Which is why I asked my question about blackmail.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home