Thursday, May 26, 2011

The Semi-Ban

Okay, the chorus of voices demanding that I ban Brian Good from posting here has gotten rather deafening. At the same time, we are proud of our reputation as one of the few places that both sides can post their arguments. You can't do that at 9-11 Flogger or Debunking the Debunkers.

So here's the deal. I will delete any comments from Brian that do not pertain to the subject matter of the actual post. If he starts nattering about how 91% of the widows' questions weren't answered, that comment goes down the memory hole unless the post in question is about those questions.

15 Comments:

At 26 May, 2011 12:45, Blogger roo said...

Decent compromise.

Things Brian or his puppets should never be able to bring up again:

-Widows' questions
-Carol Brouillet and
-William Rodriguez (unless he accepts the debate)
-424,000 tons of pulverized concrete

anything else?.....

Personally, I think he should be allowed to present his own theories at any time. 'Smoldering Meaballs on a Rake'!

 
At 26 May, 2011 12:48, Blogger roo said...

Also,

Brian should be barred from asking more than two questions in a row. He should be required to answer one of his stupid questions before he goes on to the next subject.

 
At 26 May, 2011 12:48, Blogger GuitarBill said...

Pat wrote, "...So here's the deal. I will delete any comments from Brian that do not pertain to the subject matter of the actual post."

Can you make that retroactive?

%^)

 
At 26 May, 2011 17:05, Blogger Ian said...

OK, so let's get this party started.

Brian, what do you believe happened on 9/11? You have to tell us your theory, not why you don't believe the working theories.

 
At 26 May, 2011 17:55, Blogger Triterope said...

Sounds fair to me. Thank you to Pat and James for taking this step.

 
At 26 May, 2011 21:00, Blogger sabba said...

Great idea.
More things he should not bring up since he failed to do the walking:
His C-Span Litany - (He never called and verified his arguments)
His other obsessions ie, Kevin Barrett. David Ray Griffin etc.

How he "scared" the CIT guys (Ranke, Balsamo etc.) instead of the actual refutation of the work.

His claims he never lies or stalked anyone. (It has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that he lied).

His claims he is a respected researcher. ( we all know better).

His claims that everybody runs away from him ( well it is partly true!- maybe is his B.O.?)

His claims he is not petgoat, punsuxtawneybarney, Contrivance, poordumbbastard, truetruther etc etc etc
( thanks to WR and his team of volunteer hackers who exposed the lying yenta in so many sockpuppets disguises).

His claims that some of us ( including me) is William Rodriguez and when pressed to provide evidence, he runs away.

His claims he speaks for the Widows, he does not and for that matter, any of the 9/11 victims.
His calims he is not banned from any where, we have shown otherwise.

His claim the he is not Willie Rodriguez bitch. We have seen it here in real time.

 
At 26 May, 2011 21:15, Blogger paul w said...

Yes, a good compromise.

 
At 27 May, 2011 03:09, Blogger ComradeAgopian said...

All I want to hear from Brian , is where I can get a good gyro ( with lamb of course ) and a good cup of Turkish coffee .

 
At 28 May, 2011 18:16, Blogger snug.bug said...

I recommend the DC area for good chewey Turkish Coffee. For Gyros, I can't help. I don't think I know good gyros from bad gyros.

 
At 28 May, 2011 18:18, Blogger snug.bug said...

I mean, I like Arby's, okay?

 
At 29 May, 2011 18:30, Blogger snug.bug said...

It's hardly my fault that the denizens of this forum, since they are so ignorant about 9/11, would rather talk about me than 9/11.

 
At 31 May, 2011 16:48, Blogger Ian said...

It's hardly my fault that the denizens of this forum, since they are so ignorant about 9/11, would rather talk about me than 9/11.

So what do you think happened on 9/11, Brian?

Willie Rodriguez told me you're too scared to tell us what you think really happened. He said you'll go "I don't know what happened on 9/11, that's why we need a new investigation."

 
At 01 June, 2011 10:03, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I don't have enough information to have an opinion on what happened on 9/11. Since the official reports we've been given are coverups, and since some of the with-holding of information seems to be a deliberate attempt to generate conspiracy theories, I think it best to establish the facts before indulging in theories.

 
At 01 June, 2011 16:32, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I don't have enough information to have an opinion on what happened on 9/11.

Just what Willie Rodriguez said you would say.

Boy, Brian, do you ever get tired of being pwn3d by Rodriguez?

Anyway, Brian, we all know what happened on 9/11, so your views on it are irrelevant. Even if we didn't know what happened, the last person anyone would consult would be a failed janitor who wears women's underwear.

 
At 02 June, 2011 00:43, Blogger GuitarBill said...

LOL!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home