Monday, July 11, 2011

The First Rule of Holes

When in a hole, stop digging. Now April Gallop's lawyer, William Veale, not only has to argue why he shouldn't be fined for filing a frivolous lawsuit, but has to argue why he should not be fined for filing a malicious response to being asked why he shouldn't be fined for filing a frivolous lawsuit. Good fun all around. Another nod towards LashL, the Goddess of Legaltainment for providing the court documents.

In his affidavit in support of Gallop’s motion for disqualification, William Veale—one of Gallop’s counsel of record—“demand[s]” not only that the panel, but “any other members of the bench of this Circuit who share their feelings[,] be recused.” Motion to Disqualify (Veale Aff. ¶ 2). We know of no precedent for recusing unnamed judges based on a prejudice, the only evidence of which is manifested in a decision adverse to an attorney’s (or a party’s) interests. Cf. In re Nettles, 394 F.3d 1001, 1003 (7th Cir. 2005) (recusing all district and circuit judges where the defendant acted on a threat to destroy the federal courthouse in which those judges worked by means of a truck bomb); but see Tapia-Ortiz v. Winter, 185 F.3d 8, 10 (2d Cir. 1999) (recognizing that under the rule of necessity, where all judges would be disqualified in a suit brought against every district and circuit court judge in the circuit, none are disqualified). Veale certainly points to none. Indeed, rather than pursuing his client’s interests, Veale’s actions appear to be malicious—intended, in bad faith, to use his position as an attorney of record to harass and disparage the court. See Tapia-Ortiz, 185 F.3d at 11. Such conduct, in our view, is ground for consideration of further appellate sanctions. See In re 60 E. 80th St. Equities, Inc., 218 F.3d 109, 119 (2d Cir. 2000).

Accordingly—wholly apart from the order to show cause required pursuant to our decision in Gallop, ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 1565858, at *5, for which briefs are now due on July 11, 2011 (for Gallop and her counsel) and July 14, 2011 (for the government)—William Veale is hereby ordered to show cause in writing within thirty days from the date of entry of this order why this Court should not impose additional sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38, 28 U.S.C. §1927, and the inherent authority of the Court, requiring him to provide appropriate notice to any federal court before whom he appears of any sanctions that may be imposed against him by this Court.

Labels: ,

72 Comments:

At 11 July, 2011 23:55, Blogger GuitarBill said...

"...Indeed, rather than pursuing his client’s interests, Veale’s actions appear to be malicious—intended, in bad faith, to use his position as an attorney of record to harass and disparage the court."

Ouch! Can you say "vexatious litigant"? I knew you could.

%^)

 
At 12 July, 2011 11:09, Blogger Billman said...

Knowing a lot of legalize, this is just downright hilarious. You see, troofers? You can't just make up shit and expect the court to prosecute anything based solely on YOUR delusions.

+1 for America.

 
At 12 July, 2011 11:10, Blogger Triterope said...

Nah, you have to do stuff like this a bunch of times to be declared vexatious litigant in the United States. It's not a designation they hand out lightly.

 
At 12 July, 2011 11:28, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 12 July, 2011 11:36, Blogger snug.bug said...

So Billman knows a lot of legalize, huh? That's very asstoot of him to say so. Those lega lize are absolutely the worst sort of lize.

 
At 12 July, 2011 11:39, Blogger Dave Kyte said...

Yep, a janitor pretending he is a "researcher" is the height of comedy gold.

 
At 12 July, 2011 11:55, Blogger snug.bug said...

DK, why don't you show us your high-falutin' research skills and back up your claim that I am a janitor.

 
At 12 July, 2011 11:58, Blogger Triterope said...

Uh-oh. Brian's making more off-topic posts that need to be deleted.

 
At 12 July, 2011 12:00, Blogger snug.bug said...

IOW you can't back up your lize.

 
At 12 July, 2011 14:16, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

Those lega lize are absolutely the worst sort of lize.

You'd know ALL about "lize" don't ya Brian?

Motto: "It takes a liar to know a liar!" You keep on calling us liars, well you're the one that knows about lying all too well.

Here's some quotes that suit you Brian:

"A liar begins with making falsehood appear like truth, and ends with making truth itself appear like falsehood." - William Shenstone

"Anybody who claims to read the entire paper every day is either the world's fastest reader or the world's biggest liar." - Arthur Ochs Sulzberger

"Do not consider it proof just because it is written in books, for a liar who will deceive with his tongue will not hesitate to do the same with his pen." - Maimonides

"The only thing worse than a liar is a liar that's also a hypocrite!" - Tennessee Williams

"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." - George Bernard Shaw

 
At 12 July, 2011 15:49, Blogger Ian said...

DK, why don't you show us your high-falutin' research skills and back up your claim that I am a janitor.

Brian, why don't you show us your high-falutin' research skills and back up your claim that the widows have questions.

 
At 12 July, 2011 18:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, see justicefor911.org, Appendix 4. I've only cited it for you 18 times. For you, let's make it an Even Ianane 19?

 
At 12 July, 2011 18:11, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, see justicefor911.org, Appendix 4. I've only cited it for you 18 times. For you, let's make it an Even Ianane 19?

19 is not an even number, Brian. Maybe you need to go back to 1st grade? They might also teach you that calling people "girls" to insult them is not nice.

Also, I've seen justicefor911.org. What makes you think there are questions there? Did Willie Rodriguez tell you that?

 
At 12 July, 2011 18:27, Blogger snug.bug said...

You're missing the point. You've heard then expression "Even Steven"?

Well, 19 is "Even Ian".

 
At 12 July, 2011 18:43, Blogger Ian said...

You're missing the point. You've heard then expression "Even Steven"?

Well, 19 is "Even Ian".


Brian, this babbling is just a poor attempt to cover up the fact that the widows have no questions.

 
At 12 July, 2011 18:47, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, you're a liar. Appendix 4 at justicefor911.org shows that of 300 questions, only 27 got answered.

Now why you think it's funny to lie about the victims of 9/11 is known only to you, but I don't think it's something to joke about.

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:05, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, you're a liar. Appendix 4 at justicefor911.org shows that of 300 questions, only 27 got answered.

False.

Now why you think it's funny to lie about the victims of 9/11 is known only to you, but I don't think it's something to joke about.

You're squealing again, Brian. It's not going to change the fact that the widows have no questions.

Also, they're not victims of 9/11. They didn't die that day.

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:06, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

Justice For 9/11 is hillarious, it's better than the Onion.

I'm still demanding answers to what happened to the ton of urinal cakes inside each of the towers?

Also, where'd all the toilets go?

Obviously to a trained internet researcher the WTC complex was completely replaced by a 1/1 scale Hollywood mock-up (made by Lego). That explains the free-fall speed, and the molten materials (burning jet fuel melts Legos).

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:08, Blogger snug.bug said...

MGF, you're not any funnier than Ian is.

Ian, you don't have to die to be a victim. You could make the case that the dead were luckier than the widows.

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:25, Blogger Ian said...

MGF, you're not any funnier than Ian is.

Brian, you're the funny one. Nobody is coming here to laugh at me or M. Gregory Ferris. People come here to laugh at you.

Ian, you don't have to die to be a victim. You could make the case that the dead were luckier than the widows.

False and false. Boy Brian, you really need to work on the dumbspam you post to cover up the fact that the widows have no questions.

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:31, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"You could make the case that the dead were luckier than the widows."

The widows would disagree with you.

"MGF, you're not any funnier than Ian is."

Neither of us is as funny as you are, Brian. You're the Wile E. Coyote of conspiracy loons.

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:32, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I didn't say you were funny. I said your lies about the victims of 9/11 are not funny. And the fact that no one here (besides me) tells you to STFU is an indictment of this forum.

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:39, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

Wille Rodriguez is a 9/11 victim and hero. Who lies about him? Brian "Mentally Disabled" Goode

 
At 12 July, 2011 19:49, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I didn't say you were funny. I said your lies about the victims of 9/11 are not funny. And the fact that no one here (besides me) tells you to STFU is an indictment of this forum.

Learn to read, Brian. Nobody here thinks I'm funny. People come here to laugh at you for your insane claims, such as that the widows have questions.

 
At 12 July, 2011 20:53, Blogger Billman said...

Meh. I'm just sayin', I've out-lawyered lawyers repeatedly, and can hold my own in the court room. I spose I should have spelled it "Legal-eeze?" I don't know.

 
At 12 July, 2011 21:13, Blogger M Gregory Ferris said...

"I spose I should have spelled it "Legal-eeze?" I don't know."

Nope. When Brain can't defend his theories he attacks your spelling.

 
At 12 July, 2011 22:16, Blogger snug.bug said...

MGF, if you would bother to do your homework you would see that Willie Rodriguez is a swindler. Of course you Randians probably admire that.

Billman, what theories? No need to defend the truth from illiterates.

 
At 13 July, 2011 04:35, Blogger Ian said...

MGF, if you would bother to do your homework you would see that Willie Rodriguez is a swindler. Of course you Randians probably admire that.

Squeal squeal squeal!

Billman, what theories?

Yes, let's not dignify Brian's paranoid delusions by calling them "theories".

 
At 13 July, 2011 06:36, Blogger James B. said...

"And the fact that no one here (besides me) tells you to STFU is an indictment of this forum."

Hey genius, this is not a forum, it is a blog.

 
At 13 July, 2011 08:07, Blogger Arcterus said...

Well, 19 is "Even Ian".

Razor wit at it's finest.

 
At 13 July, 2011 08:37, Blogger TANSTAAFL said...

"Appendix 4 at justicefor911.org shows that of 300 questions, only 27 got answered."

And nobody cares.

 
At 13 July, 2011 08:46, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

"Even Ian"? That doesn't sound right to me.

Now the Russian sub comanders had a thing going on where they would turn their subs around in a circle and then get back on course. They called it: "CRAZY IVAN"

"Crazy Ian" sounds better!

 
At 13 July, 2011 10:57, Blogger Triterope said...

Appendix 4 at justicefor911.org shows that of 300 questions, only 27 got answered.


Ban.

 
At 13 July, 2011 11:17, Blogger snug.bug said...

Arcterus, learn to punctuate. I'm sure glad your not a truther.

 
At 13 July, 2011 13:02, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

If I was a 9/11 Family member I'd take a plane ride out to Brian's house and literally beat the shit out of him for using the families as his own personal human shield.

That's if I was!

 
At 13 July, 2011 13:28, Blogger snug.bug said...

But you're not. We all know you're FDNY instead.

 
At 13 July, 2011 16:30, Blogger Ian said...

Well, we all know what Brian is: an unemployed janitor who stalks Willie Rodriguez all over the internet with names like "petgoat", "punxsutawneybarney", and "contrivance".

 
At 13 July, 2011 17:53, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, what is your source for the information that I am a janitor?

 
At 13 July, 2011 17:58, Blogger paul w said...

Appendix 4 at justicefor911.org shows that of 300 questions, only 27 got answered.

Ban.


This is a topic in the latest post.
As someone has suggested, rather than put the onus onto Pat and James, just ignore the guy.

Seconded.

 
At 13 July, 2011 18:09, Blogger snug.bug said...

That would be best for everyone, as ignorance is what you're best at and when you try to be smart you make fools of yourselves.

So I guess the plan is, you guys will say stupid stuff, I'll show how you're wrong, and you won't try to defend your idiocy. That will work for everybody. Good plan.

 
At 14 July, 2011 12:21, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

But you're not. We all know you're FDNY instead.

And like a true bigot and idiot, I said that I've got a FRIEND inthe FDNY. Apparently you haven't the foggiest idea what a friend is, simply cause you have no friends. Damn I'd hate to have your brain for a day Brian, I'd have to kill myself if I were you.

 
At 14 July, 2011 12:23, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

So I guess the plan is, you guys will say stupid stuff, I'll show how you're wrong, and you won't try to defend your idiocy. That will work for everybody. Good plan

Since when did you ever prove us "wrong"? Answer: NEVER!

 
At 14 July, 2011 12:41, Blogger snug.bug said...

See what I mean?

 
At 14 July, 2011 14:10, Blogger Garry said...

'Arcterus, learn to punctuate. I'm sure glad your (sic) not a truther'.

'You're', not 'your', you walking abortion.

 
At 14 July, 2011 15:41, Blogger snug.bug said...

Darn, I wanted to see if Arcterus was going to be dumb enough to step in that one, and you had to go and spoil it.

 
At 14 July, 2011 16:04, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, what is your source for the information that I am a janitor?

Your posts here and at truthaction. You said at truth action, quote, "I used to be a janitor".

You're really not a janitor Brian, after all, you're unemployed.

That would be best for everyone, as ignorance is what you're best at and when you try to be smart you make fools of yourselves.

My, such squealing!

So I guess the plan is, you guys will say stupid stuff, I'll show how you're wrong, and you won't try to defend your idiocy. That will work for everybody. Good plan.

More squealing from our hopeless failed janitor.

Darn, I wanted to see if Arcterus was going to be dumb enough to step in that one, and you had to go and spoil it.

See what I mean?

Hey Brian, have the widows had their questions answered yet?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!

 
At 14 July, 2011 16:17, Blogger snug.bug said...

Oh, well if you're going to go on evidence like that I guess it;'s fair for me to point out that at grouphug.us you confessed that you dropped out of high school and became a male prostitute in Knoxville.

 
At 14 July, 2011 16:33, Blogger Ian said...

Oh, well if you're going to go on evidence like that I guess it;'s fair for me to point out that at grouphug.us you confessed that you dropped out of high school and became a male prostitute in Knoxville.

Brian, who are you kidding? Everyone knows you are a liar. You lie about Willie Rodriguez, you lie about Carol Brouillet, you lie about Dr. Sunder, you lie about NIST, you lie about petgoat, and you lie about the so-called widows.

You're just lying again.

 
At 14 July, 2011 16:48, Blogger snug.bug said...

I didn't lie about any of those things.

 
At 14 July, 2011 17:02, Blogger Ian said...

I didn't lie about any of those things.

And now we can add another lie. Brian lied about whether he lied about Willie Rodriguez, Carol Brouillet, Dr. Sunder, the NIST, petgoat, or the "widows".

How much further down the rabbit hole do you want to go, Brian?

 
At 14 July, 2011 17:16, Blogger snug.bug said...

That's not a rabbit hole, Ian, that's your butt. I don't want anything to do with it.

 
At 14 July, 2011 17:20, Blogger Ian said...

That's not a rabbit hole, Ian, that's your butt. I don't want anything to do with it.

That's good. Given your perverted homosexual obsession with Willie Rodriguez, it's good to know you do not want to sodomize me too.

 
At 14 July, 2011 23:42, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I think you're trying to provoke me to say something homophobic about Willie Turdriguez. It's not going to work.

 
At 15 July, 2011 12:23, Blogger WhyAskQuestions said...

I think you're trying to provoke me to say something homophobic about Willie Turdriguez.

You are homophobic, that's why you love to slice and dice poor Willie. You ain't hiding your real shame with us Brian, we can see through your smoke screen.

 
At 15 July, 2011 14:54, Blogger snug.bug said...

I am neither homophobic nor homophilic. I don't particularly enjoy taking out the trash, but if it doesn't get done it starts to stink and attract rats and bugs.

 
At 15 July, 2011 19:24, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, I think you're trying to provoke me to say something homophobic about Willie Turdriguez. It's not going to work.

No, I'm just trying to get you to admit that you are obsessed with Rodriguez and want to have his children, just as you admitted you are petgoat and that you're an unemployed janitor.

 
At 15 July, 2011 19:24, Blogger Ian said...

I am neither homophobic nor homophilic. I don't particularly enjoy taking out the trash, but if it doesn't get done it starts to stink and attract rats and bugs.

Brian, what trash have you ever taken out? You're unemployed, and the truth movement disposed of you in a dumpster.

 
At 16 July, 2011 11:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

Why don't you just declare that Bill Deagle and Kevin Barrett and Craig Ranke are esteemed truthers and get it over with.

 
At 16 July, 2011 17:35, Blogger Ian said...

Why don't you just declare that Bill Deagle and Kevin Barrett and Craig Ranke are esteemed truthers and get it over with.

They are, which tells you all you need to know about what a bunch of pathetic loons the truth movement is. Now, with that in mind, remember that you were thrown out of the group.

That's right, Brian, you're so hopeless that you couldn't stay in good standing with a group that keeps these men in good standing.

 
At 16 July, 2011 18:03, Blogger snug.bug said...

Those clowns are not in good standing.

 
At 16 July, 2011 18:54, Blogger Ian said...

Those clowns are not in good standing.

How would you know? You've been expelled from the truth movement. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!

 
At 17 July, 2011 16:29, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, why don't you try going to truthaction or 911blogger and claiming that Deagle and Barrett and Ranke are esteemed truthers and see how that goes over?

You don't know what you're talking about.

 
At 17 July, 2011 17:45, Blogger Ian said...

Ian, why don't you try going to truthaction or 911blogger and claiming that Deagle and Barrett and Ranke are esteemed truthers and see how that goes over?

I actually went over there and asked. They all agreed that each of those three are esteemed truthers. I also asked about you and they said that you're a liar and failed janitor who was expelled for stalking Carol Brouillet.

HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!

You don't know what you're talking about.

Squeal squeal squeal!

 
At 17 July, 2011 19:05, Blogger snug.bug said...

You lie.

 
At 17 July, 2011 20:52, Blogger Ian said...

Did Brian say something? All I hear is a lot of squealing.

 
At 17 July, 2011 22:13, Blogger snug.bug said...

Under what name did you post at truthaction abd a 911blogger?

 
At 18 July, 2011 16:37, Blogger Ian said...

Under what name did you post at truthaction abd a 911blogger?

I posted as petgoat.

 
At 18 July, 2011 17:22, Blogger snug.bug said...

No you didn't, liar.

 
At 18 July, 2011 17:28, Blogger Ian said...

No you didn't, liar.

How do you know? You've been expelled from the truth movement, so you wouldn't know what goes on at those sites anyway.

I posted two polls. One asks if Brian Good is a liar and sex stalker who has been expelled from the truth movement. 85% said yes. The other asked if Bill Deagle, Kevin Barrett, and Craig Ranke are valuable members of the truth community. 77% said yes.

 
At 18 July, 2011 22:02, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, I monitor those sites and you are lying.

 
At 20 July, 2011 17:49, Blogger Triterope said...

You "monitor" them? Jesus Christ.

 
At 20 July, 2011 19:23, Blogger snug.bug said...

Yeah. What did you think I said?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home