Harrit, Ass, Ass, Harrit
Just in case Neils can't figure out which was his mouth in this terrific debate:
SS: I would like to ask… Niels, you say that Osama bin Laden was not wanted. To begin with, we know that the reward for him was raised immediately after 9/11. Secondly, we know that the Wanted poster states that he was wanted for other crimes as well. The fact is that once a person is wanted, then you do not necessarily issue a new wanted poster. It is not needed. But, I would like to know, because you use FBI as a source: Is FBI a reliable source or not?Note in particular that this is an early sequence during the discussion; Harrit is bringing in the Rex Tomb card early like Loose Change and not emphasizing his nanothermite research. In fact, the words "nanothermite" and "thermite" don't appear in the debate at all!
NH: Ha-ha. If FBI is not a reliable source then Osama bin Laden is innocent because we just heard Anders saying that Osama bin Laden was guilty.
SS: But is FBI a reliable source to you?
NH: No, not in this case. I definitely do not think so.
SS: Because you quote Rex Tomb as if FBI is in fact a reliable source.