Entertaining Coverage of Rooke Trial
Over at Dangerous Minds:
A couple of Mondays ago, on a cold, colorless morning at 9am sharp, I found myself in the singular predicament of joining the back of a queue of around fifteen 9/11 “Truthers” in a dismal magistrates’ court in Horsham, a small English town about an hour from London. These Truthers were mostly male, middle aged, and—I’m sorry to say—a little stinky.Hilariously, the Troofers are now claiming that it was a great triumph for their cause:
In short, it was a huge victory for the 9/11 Truth community because a court finally had to face the facts and couldn't do it. Rather than having a 3 hour hearing full of evidence including testimony by Prof. Niels (the idiot) Harrit the judge took the easy way out as described in the letter.That's funny because before the trial, the victory was supposed to be that the judge would have to listen to their "evidence". Now the fact that he didn't listen to them is a win.
posted by Pat @ 5:52 PM
34 comments
34 Comments:
Well, Pat, are you sure you aren't forgetting a few aspects that turn this into a huge huge victory? Such as
* Tony didn't get fined. This practically signifies the total surrender at the NWO. The future of one-world-government hinged on Tony getting fined, but this brave judge single-handedly killed our plans! I mean their plans. No 80% decimation of the world's polulation now! No corner office for you in NWO HQ!
* A few cops of the West Sussex police force are now onto the heels of the BBC, and already Cheney and Rummy are breaking into a sweat! Mark my words, Pat: Before the year is out, the West Szssex police force will have a few high and mighty guys in jail! Tony Blair before Easter, I say! Nothing is going to stop the West Sussex precinct now!
* The Daily Mail took an unprecedented step and wrote something nasty about the BBC! This breaks unanimosity within the MSM. Watch them fall like dominos in the coming months!
Still looking for those sources to back up your torch song, I see.
Will we ever see you "debunk" any of the facts you keep dodging?
Didn't think so...
Oystein, will you ever retract your false statements about the RJ Lee report? You said it stated that the melted iron was expected from office fires.
Was that a lie taken from Mark Roberts, or just carelessness on your part? Why didn't you ever retract it? Or was Gumboils right to call you a truther? Are you trying to discredit the "debunker" community, like Pat is?
"As for the wings, of course they were sheared off; and I am sure there was a fireball, although whether that destroyed the wings or not, I can't say." -Pat the Pony.
What's your evidence for this, Curley? Are there ANY sources that back up your claim? Can you point out where the "fireball" was in any of the many photos from the scene? You say you're sure there was one. If it didn't completely destroy the wings, can you point out where the remnants are? C'mon Ponyboy!
Or is this just another of your many, many "debunking" failures? Is it time for you to clam up and turn on comment moderation again?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pat should engage in preemptive moderation before the Lullabye League shows up to discredit the debunking enterprise.
Alie the Arab Child Molester scribbles, "...Will we ever see you "debunk" any of the facts you keep dodging?"
What "facts" are you referring to, liar?
I'll tell you what, scumbag, list your "facts" categorically and I'll rip your alleged "facts" to shreds.
Feeling lucky Ali the Arab Child Molester?
Goat fucker --- you ignorant prevaricator -- of what "enterprise" do you speak, liar? Your favorite "enterprise"? You know, lying about 9/11 and waving your 15 millimeter "penis" in the faces of little old ladies?
Pervert.
**********
Brian Good's Insane Homeless Mullet for sex predators. (Credit to Mike Rosefierce).
9/11 Sex Stalker Brian Good Unmasked!
In addition to the judge giving Mr Rooke a favourable outcome at this trial, the West Sussex Police also stated that they are going to launch an investigation into the allegations of BBC support for terrorism and withholding of vital information and evidence about terrorist activity.
How exciting. When will the investigation be announced?
I leave for work and there are zero comments, I come home and find that Pat Cowardly and Brian Good have spammed this post. I mean, it's not like either of them have jobs or friends or romantic relationships or normal interests to occupy their time.
"to the conspiracy theorist, everything that happened was meant to happen." -Pat Curley, psychologist.
More lies. Where do you come up with this crap, lamebrainster? Do you really think anyone believes flight 93 happened according to plan? Or building 7? Who do you think believes your psychobabbling stupidity?
James, PLEASE come bail out your boy Pat. His senility is ruining years of careful "debunking". He used to provide sources, research, and sound argum...
Oh wait. Never mind.
Hey Cowardly--TROOFERS ARE DOO-DOO-HEADS!
That's it. Didn't you get the memo?
James, PLEASE come bail out your boy Pat.
Your fixation with Pat Curley is caused by mental illness. Prove me wrong.
Ssshhh. Don't bother Pat. He's busy staring at graphs with Oystein, forming conclusions with no lab work, no samples, no tests, and a lot of bias speculation. You know... "debunker" science!
Don't forget to fail to cite your sources again, you sad, grey fool.
Ssshhh. Don't bother Pat.
I said prove me WRONG, idiot. You're even stupider than John-Michael "Mommy Issues" Talboo.
"I leave for work and there are zero comments, I come home and find that Pat Cowardly and Brian Good have spammed this post. I mean, it's not like either of them have jobs or friends or romantic relationships or normal interests to occupy their time."
They're like a couple of guys - who didn't fight in the Civil War - arguing over Gettysburg and how Lee should have done this, if he'd only done that.
The issue, MGF, is that the widows have 300 questions and got only 27 answers. And then there's the matter of NIST giving us only half a report. Their stated objective was to explain "why and how" the towers collapsed. They admit they can't explain how, and they claim they didn't even analyze the collapses.
So it's not about Monday morning quarterbacking. It's that the government didn't even show up for the game. And you seem to think that's ok.
"The issue, MGF, is that the widows have 300 questions and got only 27 answers."
That's because the other 273 questions are bullshit, and most of the widows realize this now. So nobody cares.
"And then there's the matter of NIST giving us only half a report. Their stated objective was to explain "why and how" the towers collapsed. They admit they can't explain how, and they claim they didn't even analyze the collapses."
They answered to the big questions just fine, only the paranoids like you seem to have a problem with it.
We still need to know "who favored flying the predator drone in Afghanistan?" or "when the shadow government came into play?" Brian? These are the kind of truth shattering questions that will really open up the conspiracy, I guess...
MGF, what exactly makes the widows' 273 questions bullshit, and when did they admit that they were bullshit? You make stuff up.
NIST did not answer the big questions at all. They did not address the essential mysteries of the collapses: Speed, symmetry, totality, squibs, arrested rotation, pulverization of concrete, lateral ejection of multi-ton components, the collapse of the robust lower core under nothing but its own weight, and melted steel.
Billman, Dr. Peter Dale Scott seems to find the "Shadow Government", also known as "Continuity of Government" very interesting. I saw him speak a couple of years ago, and I believe he said our government is still operating under a state of emergency provided for by COG. Every year the COG status must be renewed, and every year it is. That's not a silly question at all.
Also, the origins of the drone program are hardly an irrelevant issue, considering that the US claims of the right to assassinate anyone, anywhere, any time by drones may well be one of the most persistent legacies of 9/11.
I may agree with you slightly about the drone legacy of 9/11. However, the particular question I'm referring to is from the Widow's list of questions, which pertains to events prior to 9/11. Do we still need to know who favored flying the drones PRIOR to 9/11 in missions at hapoened before 9/11?
Maybe you should ask the widows why they consider the question important.
As I recall, the drone program in 15 flights in 2000 believed they had spotted bin Laden 5 times. Then in 2001 the drone flights were stopped.
I don't know much more abut it than that.
The widows have no questions, Brian.
Also, your list of the essential mysteries is incorrect. The essential mysteries that NIST did not explain are the mushroom cloud, the vaporized steel, the radiation in the dust, the burnt baboon fur found in the wreckage, and the streaks of light seen as the towers collapsed.
You lie and lie and lie. You seem to think it's funny.
Note that Brian didn't say I was wrong about the widows having no questions, or about how his list of essential mysteries is wrong.
You lie and lie and lie and you're wrong. Now are you happy?
Note that Brian says I'm wrong without any backing-up evidence. He doesn't realize that making claims without evidence is not logical.
I have many times provided to you the evidence that the widows exist, Ian. All you do is lie about it.
Note that Brian says I'm wrong without any backing-up evidence. He doesn't realize that making claims without evidence is not logical.
I have many times provided to you the evidence that the widows exist, Ian. All you do is lie about it.
Poor Brian. All he can do is repeat the same dumbspam over and over again because he knows the widows have no questions.
You're a persistent liar, Ian. What perverse pleasure do you get in making light of the frustration of the victims of 9/11 when their quest for answers is met by government stonewalling?
You're not a victim of 9/11, Brian.
Post a Comment
<< Home