Saturday, March 28, 2015

Neils Harrit Loses, Again

The Truther sites have been pretty quiet about it, I have only found a mention on a couple of Danish news sites, but it appears that Harrit lost his libel appeal against a journalist who called his beliefs the Danish equivalent of a crackpot. So go forward with the knowledge that from now on you may wander the small Scandinavian nation freely calling 9/11 conspiracy theories crackpot with impunity.

16 Comments:

At 28 March, 2015 17:06, Blogger Stewie Griffin said...

I think the Danish Newspapers should question his mentality. Maybe if they can dig deeper into his medical records they might have a story to tell about how Harrit has a condition that's normal in people his age. Perhaps he's suffering from an early form of dementia and can't think about what's real or fantasy. I'd hook my opinion and view that he's suffering from an illness and is hiding it.

 
At 29 March, 2015 13:38, Blogger truth hurts said...

So much for his Brian praised confidence :o)

 
At 29 March, 2015 16:08, Blogger Grandmastershek said...

You underestimate Brian. He will no doubt invoke some form of mental gymnastics to save face.

 
At 30 March, 2015 17:15, Blogger Ian said...

I dunno, the only way to save this face is with a long stay in a psychiatric hospital, and with a decent barber.

http://911scholars.ning.com/profile/BrianGood

 
At 31 March, 2015 08:23, Blogger snug.bug said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At 31 March, 2015 08:25, Blogger snug.bug said...

It's no surprise that y'all cannot distinguish between observation and advocacy. In your world of unsubstantiated opinion, you believe there's no difference.

 
At 31 March, 2015 09:17, Blogger Ian said...

It's no surprise that y'all cannot distinguish between observation and advocacy. In your world of unsubstantiated opinion, you believe there's no difference.

Squeal squeal squeal!

 
At 31 March, 2015 10:33, Blogger Stewie Griffin said...

It's no surprise that y'all cannot distinguish between observation and advocacy. In your world of unsubstantiated opinion, you believe there's no difference.

Stop talking about yourself Brian. You always, without thinking, of talking about yourself all the damn time.

What you say about us reflects on you ten fold Brian. Be careful how you choose your words and how you use those words against us.

 
At 31 March, 2015 18:42, Blogger truth hurts said...

As usual, Brian is just mirrortalking...

 
At 01 April, 2015 07:20, Blogger snug.bug said...

As usual, th and Stewie think "I know you are, but what am I?" is clever while Ian plays a role out of "Deliverance".

 
At 01 April, 2015 23:24, Blogger snug.bug said...

You guys pwn yourselves.

 
At 02 April, 2015 05:04, Blogger Ian said...

Yes Brian, it is a bit like Deliverance, given that I'm a smart, successful urban professional that takes outdoorsy vacations, while you're an illiterate belligerent sexual deviant with an awful hillbilly haircut.

Of course, I win every time we encounter each other, so that's different.

 
At 02 April, 2015 05:08, Blogger Ian said...

You guys pwn yourselves.

Poor Brian. Over 6 years, he's posted thousands of pages of hysterical spam here, and this is all he has left. At least he isn't humiliating himself by babbling about invisible widows with "questions" anymore.

 
At 02 April, 2015 05:09, Blogger Ian said...

Anyway, Brian, since I'm a successful professional, I'm going on a nice European vacation today, so I won't be there to taunt you for the next 10 days. Rest assured that when I return, you'll still be a failed janitor living with his parents who can't afford a decent haircut, and your invisible "widows" will still not have any questions.

 
At 02 April, 2015 09:08, Blogger snug.bug said...

Ian, only a fool would believe your claims.

Why would somebody spend so much time lying about 9/11 and sneering at the widows?

You squeal like a pig because you like it. Nobody's making you do it. You volunteer.

You lie, and lie, and lie, and lie. You must be a very unhappy person.

 
At 03 April, 2015 18:08, Blogger Stelio said...

The stupid case in the UK court failed too.

https://www.911truthoutreach.org/557-news-releases/424-matt-campbell-versus-bbc-cover-up-of-9-11-evidence.html

The court simply made Mr Campbell's case a situation of 'Strict Liability', which simply asked the question of whether Mr Campbell had or hadn't been paying his TV licence fee, to which Mr Campbell had no choice but to plead guilty. Mr Campbell was fined £75 and asked to pay court costs of £320.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home